9.3 THE PRELIMINARY HEARING
9.301 In General. The preliminary hearing is an early screening process that protects a person who is arrested on a felony charge before indictment from the possibility of a long detention on groundless charges. The hearing is held in the presence of the accused before a district court judge, who examines witnesses under oath for and against the accused to determine whether there is "sufficient cause" 90 to charge the accused with an offense. After the hearing, the felony charge is either certified to the circuit court for reference to a grand jury, reduced to a misdemeanor and tried by the district court, or dismissed. The preliminary hearing must take place "as soon as may be practical," which should be construed to mean within a reasonable time after the arrest. 91 At the preliminary hearing, the defendant must not be called upon to plead. A guilty plea entered at the hearing is inadmissible against the accused at trial. 92
The accused arrested for a felony has a statutory but not a constitutional right to a preliminary hearing. 93 Although the Virginia Code states that no person arrested for a felony may be denied a preliminary hearing, 94 a hearing is required only where the accused was arrested before indictment. 95 Where the defendant insists on the statutory right to a preliminary hearing, failure by the court to honor this right constitutes reversible error. 96 Because the requirement of a preliminary hearing in general district court is only procedural and not jurisdictional or constitutional, any defect in connection with the hearing (or lack of one) must be raised before trial or be lost forever. 97 Doing so, however, creates a procedural morass. The Court of Appeals has held that when the charge against the accused is terminated by a nolle prosequi order, and the accused is subsequently directly indicted, there is no longer an arrest on a warrant entitling the accused to a preliminary
[Page 440]
hearing. Furthermore, the circuit court is without jurisdiction to determine whether entry of the district court's nolle prosequi order is voidable. 98
9.302 Procedure.
A. Standard. At the preliminary hearing, the court determines from the evidence whether there is sufficient cause to charge the accused with the offense. 99 It is sufficient if the evidence adduced shows that an offense has been committed and that there is probable cause to believe the accused guilty of the offense. 100
If the evidence is insufficient to show reasonable grounds to believe the accused guilty of the offense charged, the court must discharge the defendant. 101 Furthermore, if the evidence shows that the accused probably committed the offense, but the court is convinced that he or she could not or would not be convicted at trial, the court may discharge the accused. If the odds are against a conviction, the court and commonwealth's attorney will generally concede that a trial under those circumstances would merely add to the burden of the court of record, as well as increase expenses on the part of everyone concerned. Discharge of the accused at a preliminary hearing, however, does not bar the commonwealth's attorney from presenting the matter to the grand jury for consideration. 102
The Virginia Supreme Court has noted in dicta that in a criminal case there is no precedential basis on which to claim that a court must find probable cause as a matter of law simply because the Commonwealth produces more than a scintilla of evidence that a crime has been committed and that the defendant committed that crime. Inherent in the court's function at a preliminary hearing is the exercise of the court's discretion in weighing the evidence, including the credibility of the witnesses and resolving the conflicts of their testimony, to determine whether probable cause has been shown. 103
If there is sufficient cause only as to a misdemeanor, the accused can be tried for that offense. The court has the responsibility to proceed to try the accused on the misdemeanor, either at the time of the hearing (but subsequent
[Page 441]
to the finding of no probable cause on the felony) or at some later time. 104 When there is sufficient cause to charge the accused with a felony, he or she must be committed to jail or let to bail pending the next stage of the proceedings. 105
B. Evidence. Evidence is presented at the preliminary hearing in an adversarial manner both for and against the accused. The accused has the right to cross-examine any witness who testifies on behalf of the Commonwealth or on behalf of any other defendant, introduce witnesses on his or her behalf, and testify in his or her behalf. 106 The evidentiary rules for a preliminary hearing are governed by the same rules of evidence applicable at the trial. 107
C. The Hearing. At the preliminary hearing, the prosecution will probably produce just enough evidence to make out a prima facie case. After the witnesses have been sworn, the Commonwealth calls its witnesses who testify in the presence of the accused. They are subject to cross-examination by the defense. Pursuant to section 19.2-266, the defendant may move for closure of the preliminary hearing in order to protect his or her right to a fair trial. 108
At the conclusion of the prosecution's case, a motion to dismiss is in order if it appears that there is not sufficient evidence to show reasonable grounds to believe the defendant has committed the offense. The motion usually should be made as a matter of course. If the motion is denied, the defense witnesses are then called, if desired. Before calling defense witnesses, counsel should carefully consider whether it is wise to do so. In all probability, if a motion to dismiss is denied at the conclusion of the Commonwealth's case, the court has made up its mind to hold the defendant for action by the grand jury. If the defense presents evidence, a motion to dismiss should be renewed at the conclusion of the hearing.
Arguments may be made by both sides after all the evidence has been presented.
[Page 442]
D. Transcripts. Either the district court or the circuit court to whom the case may be or has been certified may in its discretion order the testimony of the witnesses at the preliminary hearing reduced to writing and signed by them. 109 Failure of the court to appoint a court reporter, however, does not violate any of the accused's constitutional rights. 110 If the judge directs that the testimony be transcribed and "signed by the witnesses," the constitution's equal protection guarantee requires that an indigent be furnished a transcript of the hearing without payment of any fee. 111 When a defendant's counsel was advised that the preliminary hearing would be recorded by electronic recording equipment, but due to the equipment's malfunction no transcript was available, it was not a denial of equal protection for the court to deny the defendant's request for the transcript. 112
E. Right to Counsel. Counsel must be appointed for any indigent charged with a criminal offense punishable by death or confinement in the penitentiary or jail. 113 No hearing on the charges may be held until the accused is given a reasonable opportunity to employ counsel, or, in the case of an indigent defendant, counsel is provided. 114 Thus, counsel must be appointed for an indigent defendant before the preliminary hearing. 115
9.303 Practice.
A. Waiver.
1. In General. The accused may waive the preliminary hear-ing. 116 The waiver should be executed by the accused in writing. Counsel for the accused should consider the value of the preliminary hearing and advise the client...