AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24

"...Cold Lake First Nations, 2016 FC 1081 at para 9; Bellegarde v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2023 FC 129 at para 21; AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24 at para 21 [AC and JF]). The Court should not engage in an extensive review of the merits, because of the relative complexity of constitutio..."

"...Court of Canada in RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311 at 348–49 [ RJR] as confirmed in AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2021 CanLII 54465 [ (a) Is there a serious issue to be tried; (b) Will there will be irreparable harm if the..."

"...to determine whether his appeal raised a serious question to be tried. Relying on the decision of this Court in AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24, he says that where a claim implicates constitutional rights, an applicant for an interlocutory injunction is only required to show their case is..."

"...requires an active state process involving an exercise of state control over the individual. As stated Slatter JA in AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24 at paragraph 104, the individual must be in some way within the special administrative control of the state such as through imprisonment or ..."

"...convenience favours an injunction. RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 110 at paras 81 – 85; AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24 at paras 19 – 37 12. Serious Issue to be Tried [119] This is an interlocutory application and not a final decision regarding the Plaintiffs’..."

"...OTC 285, [2005] OJ No 1616 (SCJ).............................................................................. 552 AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2021 CanLII 54465 ..................................................... 46, 136, 140 Access Health Care Ser..."

"...Police Service , 2010 ONSC 3525 [ Canadian Civil Liberties Association ]; RJR-MacDonald 1994, above note 44. 71 See AC and JF v Alberta , 2021 ABCA 24 at para 55, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed 2021 CanLII 54465. 72 See Moms Stop the Harm Society v Alberta , 2022 ABCA 35 at para 19, leave..."

"...the detrimental impact on the defendant if it amounts to inal relief were already accommodated in the exceptions 202 AC and JF v Alberta , 2021 ABCA 24 at para 35 [ AC and JF ], categorically rejecting any presumption of constitutional validity over legislation. 203 Ibid at para 123. 204 Ca..."

"...OTC 285, [2005] OJ No 1616 (SCJ).............................................................................. 552 AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2021 CanLII 54465 ..................................................... 46, 136, 140 Access Health Care Ser..."

"...Police Service , 2010 ONSC 3525 [ Canadian Civil Liberties Association ]; RJR-MacDonald 1994, above note 44. 71 See AC and JF v Alberta , 2021 ABCA 24 at para 55, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed 2021 CanLII 54465. 72 See Moms Stop the Harm Society v Alberta , 2022 ABCA 35 at para 19, leave..."

"...the detrimental impact on the defendant if it amounts to inal relief were already accommodated in the exceptions 202 AC and JF v Alberta , 2021 ABCA 24 at para 35 [ AC and JF ], categorically rejecting any presumption of constitutional validity over legislation. 203 Ibid at para 123. 204 Ca..."

"...Cold Lake First Nations, 2016 FC 1081 at para 9; Bellegarde v Carry the Kettle First Nation, 2023 FC 129 at para 21; AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24 at para 21 [AC and JF]). The Court should not engage in an extensive review of the merits, because of the relative complexity of constitutio..."

"...Court of Canada in RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 311 at 348–49 [ RJR] as confirmed in AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 2021 CanLII 54465 [ (a) Is there a serious issue to be tried; (b) Will there will be irreparable harm if the..."

"...to determine whether his appeal raised a serious question to be tried. Relying on the decision of this Court in AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24, he says that where a claim implicates constitutional rights, an applicant for an interlocutory injunction is only required to show their case is..."

"...requires an active state process involving an exercise of state control over the individual. As stated Slatter JA in AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24 at paragraph 104, the individual must be in some way within the special administrative control of the state such as through imprisonment or ..."

"...convenience favours an injunction. RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 SCR 110 at paras 81 – 85; AC and JF v Alberta, 2021 ABCA 24 at paras 19 – 37 12. Serious Issue to be Tried [119] This is an interlocutory application and not a final decision regarding the Plaintiffs’..."