Case Law Adkins v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

Adkins v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.

Document Cited Authorities (24) Cited in Related

Appeal from a district court order granting respondentsmotion to dismiss appellants’ first amended complaint in a tort action on statute of limitations grounds. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

Eglet Adams Eglet Ham Henriod and Joel D. Henriod and Erica D. Entsminger, Las Vegas; Mueller & Associates, Inc., and Craig A. Mueller, Las Vegas; The Law Office of Lindsay A. Dibler, LLC, and Lindsay A. Dibler, St. Louis, Missouri, for Appellants.

Perkins Coie LLP and M. Ray Hartman, III, San Diego, California; King Scow Koch Durham LLC and David R. Koch, Henderson, for Respondents CalNev Pipe Line, LLC; Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP; Kinder Morgan Pipeline, LLC; and Kinder Morgan, Inc.

Jeffry M. Dorocak, City Attorney, and Timothy J. Geswein, Deputy City Attorney, Las Vegas, for Respondent City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency.

Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP and Kelly A. Evans, Chad R. Fears, Jay J. Schuttert, and Hayley E. Miller, Las Vegas; Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, and Thomas M. Goutman and Kim Kocher, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Adam E. Miller, Clayton, Missouri, and Richard L. Campbell, Boston, Massachusetts, for Respondents Monsanto Company, Pharmacia LLC, and Solutia Inc.

Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Tami D. Cowden, Kara B. Hendricks, and Alayne M. Opie, Las Vegas, for Respondent Union Pacific Railroad Company.

Matthew L. Sharp, Ltd., and Matthew L. Sharp, Reno; Sharp Law Center and A. J. Sharp, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae Nevada Justice Association.

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT, CADISH, C.J., and PICKERING and BELL, JJ.

OPINION

By the Court, PICKERING, J.:

Plaintiffs (appellants here) sued for injuries allegedly caused by exposure to toxic chemicals while they worked at the Clark County Government Center. They invoked the discovery rule to extend the two-year limitations period in NRS 11.190(4)(e) that would otherwise bar their claims. Under the discovery rule, a statute of limitations is tolled until the injured party discovers or reasonably should have discovered facts supporting a cause of action. Unlike some of Nevada’s other statutes of limitation, NRS 11.190(4)(e) does not expressly reference discovery-rule tolling. Based on this omission, the district court concluded that the discovery rule could not extend the limitations period in NRS 11.190(4)(e) and dismissed the case as time-barred. The district court’s narrow reading of NRS 11.190(4)(e) conflicts with long-standing judicial precedent, which supports application of the discovery rule in appropriate circumstances even though the statute supplying the limitations period does not specifically refer to it. Because it was error for the district court to categorically conclude that the discovery rule did not apply, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I.

Plaintiffs brought personal injury and wrongful death claims against Union Pacific Railroad, various companies that manufacture polychlorinated biphenyl (PCBs) and other toxic chemicals, companies involved with the CalNev Pipe Line, and the City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency (collectively "defendants"). Over the years,...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex