Admin. for Children's Servs. v. Tiffany P. (In re Sophia W.)

176 A.D.3d 723

111 N.Y.S.3d 110

In the MATTER OF SOPHIA W. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner;

v.Tiffany P. (Anonymous), Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1)

In the Matter of Darius W. (Anonymous).

Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner;

v.Tiffany P. (Anonymous), Appellant, et al., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)

2018–06985

Docket Nos. N–1658–17, N–1659–17

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted - September 6, 2019

October 2, 2019

Michael E. Lipson, Jericho, NY, for appellant.

Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica, NY, attorney for the child Sophia W.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Dawne A. Mitchell and John A. Newbery ), attorney for the child Darius W.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Joan L. Piccirillo, J.), dated May 2, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied those branches of the mother's motion which were to modify an order of fact-finding and disposition of the same court dated July 27, 2017, so as to grant a suspended judgment, and to vacate the finding of neglect.

ORDERED that the order dated May 2, 2018, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In January 2017, the Administration for Children's Services (hereinafter ACS) filed petitions alleging, inter alia, that the mother neglected the subject children, Darius W. and Sophia W. The petitions were based on an incident in which the child Sophia W., then age seven months, was treated at a hospital after ingesting marijuana in the parents' home. The petition also alleged that the mother neglected both children based on incidents of domestic violence perpetrated by the father against the mother in the presence of the children.

On June 15, 2017, the mother consented to a finding of neglect pursuant to Family Court Act § 1051(a). In an order of disposition dated July 27, 2017, the Family Court, inter alia, placed the child in the custody of ACS. The court further directed that the children be released to the custody of the mother on a trial basis no later than August 7, 2017.

The mother subsequently moved, inter alia, to modify the order of fact-finding and disposition so as to, in effect, vacate the finding of neglect and to retroactively grant a suspended judgment. By order dated May 2, 2018, the Family Court denied the mother's request for that relief, and the mother appeals. The court issued a permanency order dated April 19, 2018, releasing the children to the custody of the mother, without supervision.

Pursuant to Family Court Act § 1061, the Family Court may set aside, modify, or vacate any order issued in the course of a child protective proceeding "[f]or good cause shown." The statute "expresses the strong Legislative policy in favor of continuing Family Court jurisdiction over the child and family so that the court can do what is necessary in the furtherance of the child's welfare" ( Matter of Angelina AA., 222 A.D.2d 967, 968–969, 635 N.Y.S.2d 775 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). " ‘As with an initial order, the modified order must reflect a resolution consistent with the...