Case Law Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC,

Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC,

Document Cited Authorities (60) Cited in (19) Related (5)
5 cases
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2022
Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc.,
"...relates to multiple scientific or technical fields, the skilled person can comprise a team of people: Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 at para 172. However, the skilled person is not defined on a claim-by-claim basis: Teva Canada Limited v Janssen Inc, 2018 FC 754 at para 236, aff..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2022
Janssen Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc.,
"...relates to multiple scientific or technical fields, the skilled person can comprise a team of people: Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 at para 172. However, the skilled person is not defined on a claim-by-claim basis: Teva Canada Limited v Janssen Inc, 2018 FC 754 at para 236, aff..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2024
Valley Blades Ltd v. Usinage Pro-24 Inc,
"...that the skilled person avoids risk” (Leo Pharma Inc v Teva Canada Limited, 2015 FC 1237 at para 105; see also Amgen v Pfizer, 2020 FC 522 [Amgen] at paras 327-330). The POSITA can face some level of uncertainty along the way: “But equally, it cannot, in my judgment, be assume..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2023
Allergan Inc. v. Juno Pharmaceuticals Corp.,
"...under the old regime. While I accept the importance of stare decisis and its cousin, judicial comity (see Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 at para 167), I am not persuaded that I am bound to follow the previous determinations of the inventive [153] Turning to the substance of the ..."
Document | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) – 2020
Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC,
"...3, 2020). STRATAS J.A. [1] Before this Court is an appeal from a judgment dated April 16, 2020 of the Federal Court (per Southcott J.): 2020 FC 522. The Federal Court found claims 43-47 of the appellants’ Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 to be obvious and, thus, invalid. The appellants submit ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 firm's commentaries
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2021
IP Litigation 2020 Year In Review
"...JJA.). 34. Biogen Canada Inc et al v. Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc; Pharmascience Inc., 2020 FC 621. 35. Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 (Justice Southcott), aff'd 2020 FCA 188 (Stratas, Gleason, Laskin 36. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., 2020 FC 691 at p..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
Federal Court Of Appeal Upholds First Trial Judgment Under New PM(NOC) Regulations
"...As we previously reported, the Trial Judge dismissed Amgen's action and allowed Pfizer's counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity: 2020 FC 522. The Trial Judge concluded that the asserted claims were obvious because it was self-evident to try to obtain the claimed recombinant protein. T..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
First Trial Decision Under Canada's Amended Patented Medicines (Notice Of Compliance) Regulations Offers Guidance On Key Issues
"...this week, the Federal Court of Canada publicly released Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522, the first trial decision under the amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations ("PM(NOC) Regulations"). Prior to 2017, proceedings under Canada's drug patent linkage legi..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
First Trial Judgment Under New PMNOC Regulations Declares Claims To Biologic Drug Invalid
"...trial judgment in an action brought under the new Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. In Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522, the Court dismissed Amgen's action and declared certain claims in Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 (537 Patent) invalid for obviousness. The a..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
First Decision Under Amended PMNOC Regulations: Federal Court Finds Amgen's Filgrastim Patent Obvious
"...first decision under the amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations): Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522. In the decision, Pfizer was successful in establishing obviousness of the asserted claims of Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 (537 patent), re..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2022
Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc.,
"...relates to multiple scientific or technical fields, the skilled person can comprise a team of people: Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 at para 172. However, the skilled person is not defined on a claim-by-claim basis: Teva Canada Limited v Janssen Inc, 2018 FC 754 at para 236, aff..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2022
Janssen Inc. v. Sandoz Canada Inc.,
"...relates to multiple scientific or technical fields, the skilled person can comprise a team of people: Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 at para 172. However, the skilled person is not defined on a claim-by-claim basis: Teva Canada Limited v Janssen Inc, 2018 FC 754 at para 236, aff..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2024
Valley Blades Ltd v. Usinage Pro-24 Inc,
"...that the skilled person avoids risk” (Leo Pharma Inc v Teva Canada Limited, 2015 FC 1237 at para 105; see also Amgen v Pfizer, 2020 FC 522 [Amgen] at paras 327-330). The POSITA can face some level of uncertainty along the way: “But equally, it cannot, in my judgment, be assume..."
Document | Federal Court (Canada) – 2023
Allergan Inc. v. Juno Pharmaceuticals Corp.,
"...under the old regime. While I accept the importance of stare decisis and its cousin, judicial comity (see Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 at para 167), I am not persuaded that I am bound to follow the previous determinations of the inventive [153] Turning to the substance of the ..."
Document | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) – 2020
Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC,
"...3, 2020). STRATAS J.A. [1] Before this Court is an appeal from a judgment dated April 16, 2020 of the Federal Court (per Southcott J.): 2020 FC 522. The Federal Court found claims 43-47 of the appellants’ Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 to be obvious and, thus, invalid. The appellants submit ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 firm's commentaries
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2021
IP Litigation 2020 Year In Review
"...JJA.). 34. Biogen Canada Inc et al v. Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc; Pharmascience Inc., 2020 FC 621. 35. Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522 (Justice Southcott), aff'd 2020 FCA 188 (Stratas, Gleason, Laskin 36. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., 2020 FC 691 at p..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
Federal Court Of Appeal Upholds First Trial Judgment Under New PM(NOC) Regulations
"...As we previously reported, the Trial Judge dismissed Amgen's action and allowed Pfizer's counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity: 2020 FC 522. The Trial Judge concluded that the asserted claims were obvious because it was self-evident to try to obtain the claimed recombinant protein. T..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
First Trial Decision Under Canada's Amended Patented Medicines (Notice Of Compliance) Regulations Offers Guidance On Key Issues
"...this week, the Federal Court of Canada publicly released Amgen Inc. v. Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522, the first trial decision under the amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations ("PM(NOC) Regulations"). Prior to 2017, proceedings under Canada's drug patent linkage legi..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
First Trial Judgment Under New PMNOC Regulations Declares Claims To Biologic Drug Invalid
"...trial judgment in an action brought under the new Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. In Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522, the Court dismissed Amgen's action and declared certain claims in Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 (537 Patent) invalid for obviousness. The a..."
Document | Mondaq Canada – 2020
First Decision Under Amended PMNOC Regulations: Federal Court Finds Amgen's Filgrastim Patent Obvious
"...first decision under the amended Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (PMNOC Regulations): Amgen Inc v Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 522. In the decision, Pfizer was successful in establishing obviousness of the asserted claims of Canadian Patent No. 1,341,537 (537 patent), re..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial