Case Law Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.

Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.

Document Cited Authorities (156) Cited in (149) Related (2)
728 F.Supp.2d 372

Pasha S. ANWAR, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LTD., et al., Defendants.


No. 09 Civ. 0118 (VM).

United States District Court,
S.D. New York.


Aug. 18, 2010.

728 F.Supp.2d 383

David A. Barrett, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Christopher Lovell, Victor E. Stewart, Jody Krisiloff, Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP,

728 F.Supp.2d 384
James Abram Harrod, III, Carl Lester Stine, Chet Barry Waldman, James Abram Harrod, III, Robert Craig Finkel, Wolf Popper LLP, Robert Alan Wallner, Jean Lee, Kent Andrew Bronson, Kristi Stahnke McGregor, Robert Alan Wallner, Milberg LLP, William M. O'Connor, Crowell & Moring LLP, Brian Dale Graifman, David Alan Gehn, Gusrae, Kaplan, Bruno & Nusbaum, PLLC, David A. Barrett, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Jody Krisiloff, Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP, Catherine A. Torrell, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll P.L.L.C., Daniel W. Krasner, Demet Basar, Gregory Mark Nespole, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, Hillary Sobel, Jeffrey Charles Zwerling, Robert S. Schachter, Stephanie Elizabeth Kirwan, Richard A. Speirs, Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling, David J. Molton, Martin S. Siegel, Brown Rudnick LLP, Joseph Emanuel Neuhaus, Sullivan and Cromwell, LLP, New York, NY, Sashi Bach Boruchow, Stuart Harold Singer, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Matthew W. Cheney, Crowell & Moring LLP, Daniel S. Sommers, Joshua Seth Devore, Steven Jeffrey Toll, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Washington, DC, Paul Edouard Dans, Rivero Mestre & Castro, Jeffrey F. D. Bogert, Bogert & Rembold, P.L., Laurence Edward Curran, III, Curran & Associates, Coral Gables, FL, David Alan Rothstein, Jeffrey Brett Kaplan, Lorenz Michel Pruss, Dimond Kaplan & Rothstein, Coconut Grove, FL, Robert E. Linkin, Dimond Kaplan & Rothstein, PA, Richard E. Brodsky, The Brodsky Law Firm, Miami, FL, Michael Jules Aguirre, Aguirre, Morris & Severson LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Abn Amro Life S.A., pro se.

Mark Geoffrey Cunha, Michael Joseph Chepiga, Paige Elizabeth Fleming, Paul Jacob Sirkis, Peter Eric Kazanoff, Sara Ann Ricciardi, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Glenn Kurtz, White & Case LLP, Andrew J. Levander, David Scott Hoffner, Dechert, LLP, Adam K. Grant, Daniel R. Benson, Daniel J. Fetterman, Marc E. Kasowitz, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, Helen Virginia Cantwell, Mark P. Goodman, Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, Eliot Lauer, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, LLP, Mindy M. Yu, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Gabrielle Sean Marshall, Sarah Loomis Cave, William R. Maguire, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Lawrence P. Eagel, Bragar, Wexler & Eagel, P.C., Stephen Lee Weinstein, Eiseman, Levine, Lehrhaupt & Kakoyiannis, P.C., Glenn Kurtz, White & Case LLP, Edward M. Spiro, Robert James Anello, Claudio Godinez Roumainochoa, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., Peter Eric Kazanoff, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Steven Wolowitz, Mayer Brown LLP, Michael Joseph Moscato, Timothy Neil McCabe, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, LLP, Jonathan David Cogan, Michael Sangyun Kim, Kobre & Kim LLP, David J. Molton, Martin S. Siegel, Brown Rudnick LLP, Jack Yoskowitz, Seward & Kissel LLP, Anne K. Small, Wilmerhale, Brad Eric Konstandt, Fraser Lee Hunter, Jr., Howard M. Shapiro, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, L.L.P., Michael Joseph Chepiga, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Kenneth A. Zitter, Law Offices of Kenneth A. Zitter, Claudio Godinez Roumainochoa, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., Sharon L. Nelles, Allison Caffarone, Bradley Paul Smith, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, Patrick Barrett Berarducci, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, New York, NY, Jennie Boehm Krasner, Dechert, LLP, Princeton, NJ, Amanda McGovern, Dyanne Eyce Feinberg, Elizabeth A. Izquierdo, Lewis Nathan Brown, Terence Michael Mullen, Gilbride Heller & Brown P.A., Ricardo Alejandro Gonzalez, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Hilarie Bass, Ricardo Alejandro Gonzalez, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, FL, Matthew Buckley,

728 F.Supp.2d 385
Amy E. Crawford, Brenton Rogers, Emily Nicklin, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Timothy A. Duffy, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL, Diane Lee McGimsey, Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.

Arjan Mohandas Bhatia, pro se.

Parasram Daryani, pro se.

Neelam P. Daryani, pro se.

Vikas P. Daryani, pro se.

Nikesh P. Daryani, pro se.

Ashokkumar Damodardas Raipancholia, pro se.

Dilip Damodardas Raipancholia, pro se.

Rajeshkumar Damodardas Raipancholia, pro se.

Kishu Nathurmal Uttamchandani, pro se.

Prerna Vinod Uttamchandani, pro se.

Rajendrakumar Patel, pro se.

Vandna Patel, pro se.

Kishin Mohandas Bhatia, pro se.

Suresh M. Bhatia, pro se.

Bharat Mohandas, pro se.

Aarvee Ltd., pro se.

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 387
II. BACKGROUND 387
A. THE FAIRFIELD GREENWICH FUNDS 387
B. THE FUNDS AND MADOFF 389
C. FGG'S FALSE STATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS 390
D. RED FLAGS 391
E. FEES PAID TO FGG 392
F. CITCO 392
G. GLOBEOP 394
H. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 395
1. Clean Audits 395
2. Relationship with Plaintiffs 396
3. Risks 396
III. DISCUSSION 397
A. THRESHOLD ISSUES COMMON TO ALL DEFENDANTS 397
1. SLUSA 397
2. Choice of Law 399
3. Standing 400
4. Martin Act 402
B. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 402
C. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH DEFENDANTS 403
1. FGG 403
2. Securities Fraud Claims 404
a. Application of Morrison 404
b. Group Pleading 405
c. Scienter 406
d. Causation 411
e. Section 20(a) 412
3. Common Law Claims 414
a. Fraud 414
b. Gross Negligence 414
c. Breach of Fiduciary Duty 415
d. Negligent Misrepresentation 416
e. Third-Party Breach of Contract 417
f. Constructive Trust 419
g. Mutual Mistake 420
h. Unjust Enrichment 421
D. ADMINISTRATORS AND CUSTODIANS 421
1. Citco Defendants 421
a. Rule 8(a) 422
b. Federal Securities Claims 423
i. Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 Claim Against Administrators 423
A. Scienter 423
B. Reliance 424
ii. Section 20(a) Claim against Citco Group 425
A. Control 425
B. Culpable Participation 427
iii. Statute of Limitations 428
c. Third-Party Beneficiary Breach of Contract 428
i. Administration Agreements 429
ii. Custody Agreements 431
d. Negligence, Gross Negligence, and Negligent Misrepresentation 431
i. Duty of Care 432
ii. Citco Group Secondary Liability 435
iii. Gross Negligence 436
e. Breach of Fiduciary Duty 437
i. Individual Defendants 438
ii. Citco Defendants 440
f. Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraud 442
g. Unjust Enrichment 443
h. Holder Claims 443
i. Statute of Limitations 445
2. GlobeOp 446
a. Supervening Cause 446
b. Fiduciary Duty 446
c. Negligence and Gross Negligence 448
E. AUDITORS 449
1. Federal Securities Law Claims Against the PwC Member Firms 449
a. Scienter 449
i. Legal Standard for Accountants 449
ii. The PwC Member Firms' Conscious Recklessness 449
A. Professional Standards 450
B. Red Flags 451
iii. Plausible Opposing Inference 453
b. Section 20(a) Claim Against PwC International 454
2. Common Law Claims 454
a. Gross Negligence 454
b. Negligence and Negligent Misrepresentation 454
i. Duty of Care 454
A. Awareness That the Financial Reports Were to Be Used for a Particular Purpose 455
B. Intention for a Known Party to Rely on the Financial Reports 455
C. Linking Conduct Evincing the Accountants' Understanding of Plaintiffs' Reliance 456
c. Breach of Contract 457
d. Aiding and Abetting a Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Fraud 458
e. Unjust Enrichment 458
f. Vicarious Liability 458
i. Control of the Audits 459
ii. General Control 459
g. Statute of Limitations 461
F. LEAVE TO REPLEAD 461
IV. ORDER 462
728 F.Supp.2d 387

I. INTRODUCTION

This lawsuit is a putative class action on behalf of individuals and entities (collectively, "Plaintiffs") who invested large sums of money in four funds founded and operated by the Fairfield Greenwich Group ("FGG"). The overwhelming majority of Plaintiffs' money was in turn invested in the Ponzi scheme operated by Bernard Madoff ("Madoff") under the auspices of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, Inc. ("BMIS"), and for which Madoff was sentenced to 150 years in prison following his guilty plea. See United States v. Madoff, No. 09 Cr. 0213, S.D.N.Y. June 29, 2009. Plaintiffs are now suing a number of Fairfield Greenwich entities, executives, and other professional service providers who audited, administered, or served as custodian of the funds. The Second Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed September 29, 2009 (the "SCAC"), alleges violations of federal securities law and common law tort, breach of contract and quasi-contract causes of action. FGG and numerous co-defendants (collectively, "Defendants") move to dismiss the SCAC in its entirety, asserting defenses grounded in federal and state law.

Because of the breadth of issues raised in Defendants' various submissions, the Court considers their motions in two separate rulings. The first Decision and Order (" Anwar I ") was issued July 29, 2010, and addressed a discrete issue arising solely under New York state law. See Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 09 Civ. 0118, 728 F.Supp.2d 354, 2010 WL 3022848 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2010). This Decision and Order, to be referred to as " Anwar II," considers a host of arguments made by Defendants that all of Plaintiffs' claims should be dismissed.1

II. BACKGROUND 2

A. THE FAIRFIELD GREENWICH FUNDS

The facts in this case are relatively straightforward; the complications arise in attempting to comprehend and dissect FGG's corporate structuring, an intricate

728 F.Supp.2d 388
tangle of entities with, as alleged in the SCAC, connections of various strength to New York, Florida, Delaware, Bermuda, the United Kingdom, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands. ( See SCAC ¶¶ 118, 120, 122, 141, 172, 173, 121, 130, 139, 143, 118, 170, 171.) This structure is comprised of, as alleged and pertinent to the motions to dismiss at hand, corporate entities that all apparently existed to accomplish the same task-managing funds invested almost exclusively with Bernard Madoff. Those entities, in addition to FGG, are Fairfield Greenwich Advisors LCC ("FGA"), Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. ("FGL"), and three wholly-owned FGL subsidiaries: Fairfield Greenwich (Bermuda) Ltd. ("FGBL"), Fairfield Risk Services Ltd. ("FRS"), and Fairfield...
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2021
In re Aegean Marine Petroleum Network, Inc. Sec. Litig.
"... ... Citic Tr. Co., Ltd. , 3 F. Supp. 3d 137, 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). Pursuant to the effects test, ... -entity control over its member firms in the auditing context." Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. , 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ... "
Document | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York – 2018
In re Soundview Elite Ltd.
"... ... See Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. , 728 F.Supp.2d 372, 441-42 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (refusing to dismiss claim ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2019
Cyganowski v. Beechwood Re Ltd. (In re Platinum-Beechwood Litig.)
"... ... to individual defendants even when the exact source of those statements is unknown." Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. , 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 405 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). "Group pleading allows ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2011
Cobalt Multifamily Investors I, LLC v. Arden
"... ... See Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F.Supp.2d 372, 421 (S.D.N.Y.2010) (“to ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit – 2015
Northstar Fin. Advisors Inc. v. Schwab Invs.
"... ... E.g., Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F.Supp.2d 372, 430 (S.D.N.Y.2010) ; see ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
2 firm's commentaries
Document | Mondaq United States – 2013
In The Second Circuit, Uncertainty Remains Over The Triggering Event For The Statute Of Repose Applicable To Federal Securities Fraud Claims
"...Corp. Sec. Lit., 500 F.3d 189, 200 (3d Cir. 2007); McCann v. Hy-Vee, Inc., 663 F.3d 926 at 932. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 387 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). In 2011 and 2012, federal district courts in California and Virginia also applied the Second Circuit's holding in Arno..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2025
New York's High Court Assesses Punitive Damages Where Alleged Deceptive Conduct Underlies Claims For Breach Of Contract And Violation Of General Business Law 349
"...of Contract Claim; Fairfield Fin. Mortgage Grp., Inc. v. Luca, 584 F. Supp. 2d 479, 484 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 415 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). GBL 349 - No Punitive The Court of Appeals then resolved a question that lower courts had disagreed upon..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2021
In re Aegean Marine Petroleum Network, Inc. Sec. Litig.
"... ... Citic Tr. Co., Ltd. , 3 F. Supp. 3d 137, 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). Pursuant to the effects test, ... -entity control over its member firms in the auditing context." Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. , 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ... "
Document | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York – 2018
In re Soundview Elite Ltd.
"... ... See Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. , 728 F.Supp.2d 372, 441-42 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (refusing to dismiss claim ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2019
Cyganowski v. Beechwood Re Ltd. (In re Platinum-Beechwood Litig.)
"... ... to individual defendants even when the exact source of those statements is unknown." Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd. , 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 405 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). "Group pleading allows ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2011
Cobalt Multifamily Investors I, LLC v. Arden
"... ... See Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F.Supp.2d 372, 421 (S.D.N.Y.2010) (“to ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit – 2015
Northstar Fin. Advisors Inc. v. Schwab Invs.
"... ... E.g., Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F.Supp.2d 372, 430 (S.D.N.Y.2010) ; see ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 firm's commentaries
Document | Mondaq United States – 2013
In The Second Circuit, Uncertainty Remains Over The Triggering Event For The Statute Of Repose Applicable To Federal Securities Fraud Claims
"...Corp. Sec. Lit., 500 F.3d 189, 200 (3d Cir. 2007); McCann v. Hy-Vee, Inc., 663 F.3d 926 at 932. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 387 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). In 2011 and 2012, federal district courts in California and Virginia also applied the Second Circuit's holding in Arno..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2025
New York's High Court Assesses Punitive Damages Where Alleged Deceptive Conduct Underlies Claims For Breach Of Contract And Violation Of General Business Law 349
"...of Contract Claim; Fairfield Fin. Mortgage Grp., Inc. v. Luca, 584 F. Supp. 2d 479, 484 (E.D.N.Y. 2008); Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd., 728 F. Supp. 2d 372, 415 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). GBL 349 - No Punitive The Court of Appeals then resolved a question that lower courts had disagreed upon..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial