Appendices: A Pattern of Ruling Against Mother Nature: Wildlife Species Cases Decided by Justice Kavanaugh on the DC Circuit

a ppenDiceS : a p attern of r uling a gainSt m other n ature : w ilDlife S pecieS c aSeS D eciDeD by J uStice K avanaugh on the Dc c ircuit By William J. Snape, III * A PPENDIx A Judge Sentelle’s Wildlife Decisions Case Notes Friends of Animals v. Jewell , 824 F.3d 1033 (D.C. Cir. 2016) Against wildlife Bldg. Indus. Ass’n of Superior Cal. v. Babbitt , 161 F.3d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1998) For wildlife Am. Wildlands v. Kempthorne , 530 F.3d 991 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Against wildlife Nat. Ass’n. of Home Builders v. Babbitt , 130 F.3d 1041 (D.C. Cir. 1997) Against wildlife Defs. of Wildlife v. Gutierrez , 532 F.3d 913 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Against wildlife Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or. v. Babbitt , 17 F.3d 1463 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Against wildlife Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Dep’t. of Interior , 563 F.3d 466 (D.C. Cir. 2009) Half for wildlife Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Hodel , 865 F.2d 288 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Half for wildlife Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partn. v. Salazar , 661 F.3d 66 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (Majority Opinion) Against wildlife Anglers Conservation Network v. Pritzker , 809 F.3d 664 (D.C. Cir. 2016) (Majority Opinion) Against wildlife Marcum v. Salazar , 694 F.3d 123 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (Majority Opinion) For wildlife Spirit of the Sage Council v. Norton , 411 F.3d 225 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Majority Opinion) For wildlife Animal Legal Def. Fund, Inc. v. Glickman , 204 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (Majority Opinion) Against wildlife Defs. of Wildlife & Sierra Club v. Perciasepe , 714 F.3d 1317 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (Majority Opinion) For wildlife Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n , 405 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (Majority Opinion) For wildlife Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partn. v. Salazar , 616 F.3d 497 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (Majority Opinion) Against wildlife Grunewald v. Jarvis , 776 F.3d 893 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (Majority Opinion) Half/half C & W Fish Co. v. Fox , 931 F.2d 1556 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Against wildlife Ala. Power Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n , 979 F.2d 1561 (D.C. Cir. 1992) For wildlife Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency , 749 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2014) Against wildlife S.D. Warren Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n , 164 Fed. Appx. 1 (D.C. Cir. 2005) For wildlife Nat. Ass’n. of Home Builders v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs , 264 Fed. Appx. 10 (D.C. Cir. 2008) For wildlife Am. Rivers & Ala. Rivers All. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n , 895 F.3d 32 (D.C. Cir. 2018) For wildlife Nat’l Wildlife Federation v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n , 912 F.2d 1471 (D.C. Cir. 1990) Against wildlife Oceana, Inc. v. Locke , 670 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2011) For wildlife Rancho Viejo, LLC v. Norton , 334 F.3d 1158 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Against wildlife Fla. Audubon Soc’y v. Bentsen , 94 F.3d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1996) Against wildlife 27 TOTAL CASES 11.5 CASES FOR WILDLIFE 43% FOR WILDLIFE 57% AGAINST WILDLIFE 32 Sustainable Development Law & Policy A PPENDIx B Judge Garland’s Wildlife Decision Case Notes Safari Club Int’l & Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Zinke , 878 F.3d 316 (D.C. Cir. 2017) Half for/half against wildlife Am. Wildlands v. Kempthorne , 530 F.3d 991 (D.C. Cir. 2008) Against wildlife In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing & Section 4(d) Rule Litig. ( Safari Club Int’l v. Salazar ), 709 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Half for/half against Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Kempthorne , 472 F.3d 872 (D.C. Cir. 2006) Half for/half against Rancho Viejo, LLC v. Norton , 323 F.3d 1062 (D.C. Cir. 2003) For wildlife Conservation Force, Inc. v. Jewell , 733 F.3d 1200 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Half for/half against Am. Bird Conservancy, Inc. v. Fed. Commc’n Comm’n , 516 F.3d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 2008) For wildlife Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp , 661 F.3d 1147 (D.C. Cir. 2012) Three quarters against/ one quarter for Swanson Grp. Mfg., LLC v. Jewell , 790 F.3d 235 (D.C. Cir. 2015) For wildlife Animal Legal Def. Fund, Inc. v. Glickman , 204 F.3d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Against wildlife Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partn. v. Salazar , 616 F.3d 497 (D.C. Cir. 2010) Against wildlife Gerber v. Norton , 294 F.3d 173 (D.C. Cir. 2002) For wildlife Grunewald v. Jarvis , 776 F.3d 893 (D.C. Cir. 2015) Half for/half against Humane Soc’y of the U.S. v. Glickman , 217 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2000) For wildlife Oceana, Inc. v. Locke , 670 F.3d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 2011) For wildlife Conservation Law Found. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm’n , 216 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Against wildlife Davis v. Latschar , 202 F.3d 359 (D.C. Cir. 2000) One half for/one half against 17 TOTAL CASE 9.25 FOR SPECIES 54% FOR WILDLIFE 46% AGAINST WILDLIFE Fall 2018 33