Autumn P. v. Admin. for Children's Servs. (In re Robann H.)

221 A.D.3d 502

198 N.Y.S.3d 352 (Mem)

In the MATTER OF ROBANN H., a Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc.,

Autumn P., Respondent–Appellant,

v.Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

1052

Dkt. No. NN-5853/22

Case No.2023–00880

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Entered: November 21, 2023

Steven N. Feinman, White Plains, for appellant.

Sylvia O. Hinds–Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (D. Alan Rosinus, Jr. of counsel), for respondent.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Polixene Petrakopoulos of counsel), attorney for the child.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, Oing, Pitt–Burke, Higgitt, JJ.

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, Bronx County (Robert D. Hettleman, J.), entered on or about January 10, 2023, which, after a fact-finding hearing, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, determined that respondent mother neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that the mother neglected the child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on her. The child's out-of-court statement that the mother hit her in the mouth with a closed fist, causing her lower lip to bleed, was corroborated by the testimony of the Administration for Children's Services (ACS) caseworker (see Matter of Empress B. [Henrietta L.], 204 A.D.3d 562, 563, 165 N.Y.S.3d 298 [1st Dept. 2022] ). The caseworker also testified that the child had a photograph of the injury on her phone and showed it to the caseworker, who took a photograph of it with her own phone. The court properly admitted the photograph into evidence, as the caseworker's testimony laid the proper foundation that it "accurately represented" the digital image that she had seen on the child's phone, and that the child was, in fact, the person shown in the photograph (see People v. Price, 29 N.Y.3d 472, 477, 58 N.Y.S.3d 259, 80 N.E.3d 1005 [2017] ). The court was entitled to take a negative inference against the mother from her failure to testify (see Matter of Nicole H., 12 A.D.3d 182, 783 N.Y.S.2d 575 [1st Dept. 2004] ).

That the child's injuries resulted from only one incident does not preclude a finding of excessive corporal punishment (see Matter of Empress B., 204 A.D.3d at 563, 165 N.Y.S.3d 298 ). In addition, the evidence shows that the child was emotionally harmed by other instances of the mother's violent and erratic behavior, including...