Sign Up for Vincent AI
Back v. Virginia
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Rhonda Back brings this action against her former employer, the Commonwealth of Virginia, and James Granger, her former supervisor. She asserts a claim of sexual harassment and hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., against the Commonwealth, and a claim of assault and battery against the Commonwealth and Granger. (Am. Compl., Dkt. No. 29.) Pending before the court is defendants' motion for summary judgment, seeking judgment as a matter of law on both claims. (Dkt. No. 68.) The motion has been fully briefed and argued. For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant defendants' motion as to Back's Title VII claim and deny the motion as to her state-law claims.
This action arises out of Rhonda Back's employment with the Virginia Department of Veterans Services (DVS).1 Back started with DVS on November 25, 2013, as a VeteransServices Representative in DVS's Salem, Virginia office. She received approximately six weeks of initial training at DVS's Roanoke office before transferring to Salem. In July 2015, she accepted a promotion to the position of Western Outreach Coordinator in the Wytheville, Virginia office. (Cates Decl. ¶ 4; Back Dep. 90.) James Granger worked for DVS as the Deputy Director of Benefits and as Chief of the DVS Center of Excellence, located in Roanoke. (Granger Dep. 38.) Granger was Back's supervisor until Back transferred to Wytheville, at which point Brandy Disbennett-Albrecht became Back's supervisor. (Disbennett-Albrecht Decl. ¶ 2, Dkt. No. 69-14.)
Except for the first six weeks of Back's employment with DVS, she worked in a different office than Granger. (Granger Dep. 185.) When she moved to the Salem office, she no longer saw Granger daily, but nonetheless continued to see him with moderate frequency because she had to drop off work at the Roanoke office and would see him at trainings and other events. Although she acknowledged that it could have taken just a few minutes to drop off her files, Back nonetheless visited with other DVS employees and often ran into Granger in the process. (Back Dep. 140-43.)
Once Back moved to Wytheville, she would see Granger only when she made occasional trips to Roanoke and during trainings. (See Back Dep. 107-08, 158-59 (); Burch Decl. ¶ 5, Dkt. No. 69-5 ( ); Dickerson Decl. ¶ 6, Dkt. No. 69-16 (); Granger Dep. 193 ( ).)
Granger has a history of physical contact with DVS employees, including hugging and kissing both his fellow supervisors and subordinates. (See, e.g., Disbennett-Albrecht Dep. 48-50, Dkt. No. 70-7 (); Sessoms Dep. 20, Dkt. No. 70-10 (); Wade Dep. 11-15, Dkt. No. 70-11 (); Zirkle Dep. 8-10, Dkt. No. 70-14 ().) In fact, when asked about Granger's behavior, some DVS employees commented on Granger's reputation as a "hugger." (See Cates Dep. 28-29, Dkt. No. 70-5 (); Wilson-Carter Dep. 22, Dkt. No. 70-4 ().)
In his deposition, Granger explained that he believed that a "kiss or [sic] the forehead, a kiss on the cheek, is one thing," but that a "kiss on the lips is strictly off bounds." He also stated that he has kissed two DVS employees on the lips, though he considered those kisses to be "simply a greeting" and "not a sexual act at all." (Granger Dep. 108, 139.) Granger huggedboth male and female DVS employees, but he refused to kiss male employees. (Granger Dep. 106.)
Although some DVS employees described Granger's actions as "fatherly," or "harmless" greetings (see, e.g., Burch Decl. ¶ 3 ( ); Cates Decl. ¶ 15 ( ); Ratcliffe Decl. ¶ 3, Dkt. No. 69-9 ( ); see also Smither Decl. ¶ 4, Dkt. No. 69-6; White Decl. ¶ 5, Dkt. No. 69-7; Williams Decl. ¶ 6, Dkt. No. 69-8), others felt his interactions and comments were inappropriate or made them uncomfortable (see, e.g., Cecil Dep. 13, Dkt. No. 70-6 (); Disbennett-Albrecht Dep. 66 (); Vaughn Dep. 148-51, Dkt. No. 70-1 (); Wilson-Carter Dep. 21-22 (); Zirkle Dep. 35 ( ).)
Significantly, DVS's management knew about Granger's tendency to interact physically with his coworkers and subordinates. Specifically, Tom Herthel, Director of DVS, and Lisa Cates, Human Resources Director for DVS, had each witnessed Granger's hugging and kissingpreviously. (See Back Dep. 253-54 (); Cates Dep. 29-30 (); Herthel Dep. 49-51, Dkt. No. 70-15 (); Sessoms Dep. 17-18 ().) Granger also previously kissed Disbennett-Albrecht, who was Back's supervisor after Back transferred to Wytheville. At one point, Granger even told Disbennett-Albrecht that he wanted to see her naked and asked to go to her hotel room. (Disbennett-Albrecht Dep. 60-63.) However, Herthel acknowledged that until June 7, 2017, he never told Granger to stop hugging DVS employees. (Herthel Dep. 55, 74.) Rather, Herthel explained that "lots of folks" in the western part of Virginia "hug each other," while at the same time stating, (Id. at 74.)
Granger's physical interactions with Back started when he hugged Back on her first day with DVS. Back recalled thinking that Granger's hug that first day was "highly inappropriate." (Back Dep. 91-92.) Even after Back began working in Salem, Granger would hug her or kiss her on the cheek or forehead when he saw her. As time went on, his hugs got tighter, and he would hold her for longer. (Id. at 92, 136-37, 255.) Granger testified that Back initiated several hugs and that some of the hugs were "mutual." (Granger Dep. 194-95.) Conversely, Back stated that she never initiated a hug because she is "not a hugger of men," but sheacknowledged that she would "wrap [her] arms around him" when he initiated a hug. (Back Dep. 172.)
Back testified that in July 2015, Granger gave her a tight hug and kissed her on the lips. Although Back was "stunned," "immediately upset," and considered the kiss harmful, she did not fear for her safety and did not complain to management. (Id. at 126-29, 143-44.) According to Back, several other employees witnessed the kiss. (Id. at 127-28 ().) Back also reported the kiss to Pam Zirkle and Brittany Dickerson, but she asked Zirkle not to tell anyone about it. (Id. at 131-32; Zirkle Dep. 28.) Back testified that when she told Dickerson about her encounter, Dickerson told her Granger also hugged and kissed her. (Back Dep. 132.)
However, Granger disputes that he ever kissed Back on the lips (Granger Dep. 194-95), and Back's alleged witnesses do not remember seeing Granger kiss Back (Smither Dec. ¶ 7; White Dec. ¶ 9; Wade Dep. 19; Smith Dec. ¶ 5, Dkt. No. 69-12). Additionally, Dickerson stated that she "never saw Mr. Granger give Ms. Back a kiss on the lips, nor did Ms. Back ever tell me about such an event." (Dickerson Decl. ¶ 7.)
On June 7, 2017, Herthel told Granger to stop hugging DVS employees after receiving complaints of sexual harassment involving Granger and another employee, Rashaan Vaughn. (Herthel Dep. 55.) Nonetheless, Granger, who believed Herthel's instruction was "petty" (Granger Dep. 170), continued hugging DVS employees and, on around June 28 or 29, gaveBack a tight hug and...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting