Sign Up for Vincent AI
Barclay Lofts LLC v. PPG Indus.
DECISION AND ORDER ON PPG'S MOTION FOR SPOLIATION SANCTIONS
Defendant PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”) moved to compel Plaintiff Barclay Lofts LLC (“Barclay”) to produce its corporate representative to complete his deposition testimony and requested sanctions for spoliation based on Barclay's alleged failure to preserve text messages. (Docket # 158.) I held a hearing on PPG's motion on June 30, 2023. (Docket # 176.) At the hearing, I addressed and granted in part PPG's motion to compel allowing the completion of Kiemen's Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) deposition as to topic ten. (Docket # 178 at 21.) As to PPG's spoliation request, I took the motion under advisement, and ordered the parties to attempt to determine whether any additional text messages exist that would be responsive to PPG's discovery requests. (Id. at 27.)
On August 15, 2023, PPG informed the Court that Barclay produced 172 screenshots of text messages it was able to collect, many of which PPG asserts are relevant to PPG's RCRA and CERCLA defenses. (Docket # 182.) PPG states that Barclay's counsel acknowledged that Barclay only preserved text messages following Kiemen's March 2023 deposition. (Id.) PPG requested that the Court rule on the fully briefed spoliation motion.
(Id.) Barclay filed its own letter the next day including additional arguments in opposition to the spoliation motion. (Docket # 183.) PPG responded the same day, asserting that Barclay has filed an unauthorized sur-reply and requests that it either be stricken, or that PPG be granted leave to file a sur-sur-reply brief and hear oral argument on the motion. (Docket # 184.) Additional arguments from either party are unnecessary to resolve this motion. Barclay's sur-reply will not be considered, nor will PPG be permitted to file a sur-sur-reply.
Turning to the merits, PPG accuses Barclay of failing to preserve relevant text messages and requests the spoliation sanction of an adverse inference to correct the alleged spoliation. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(e) provides the sole source to address the loss of relevant electronically stored information, or ESI that was required to be preserved but was not because reasonable steps were not taken, resulting in prejudice to the opposing party. Hollis v. CEVA Logistics U.S Inc., 603 F.Supp.3d 611, 617 (N.D. Ill. 2022). Rule 37(e) has five threshold requirements: (1) the information must be ESI; (2) there must have been anticipated or actual litigation that triggers the duty to preserve ESI; (3) the relevant ESI should have been preserved at the time the litigation was anticipated or ongoing; (4) the ESI must have been lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it; and (5) the lost ESI cannot be restored or replaced through additional discovery. Id. If any of these requirements are not met, then curative measures and sanctions are unavailable under Rule 37(e). Id.
Once the threshold requirements of Rule 37(e) are met, Rule 37(e)(1) and (2) provides the following remedies:
I will assume without deciding that PPG can meet the five threshold requirements of Rule 37(e). Even with this assumption however, PPG asks for sanctions under Rule 37(e)(2), i.e., for an adverse inference presumption if the case proceeds to trial. (Docket # 161-1 at 25.) But Rule 37(e)(2) requires PPG to show that Barclay acted with the intent to deprive PPG of the...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting