Case Law Bauer v. Summey

Bauer v. Summey

Document Cited Authorities (86) Cited in (1) Related

Thomas Michael Fernandez, Fernandez Law, Summerville, SC, Thomas William Winslow, Goldfinch Winslow LLC, Murrells Inlet, SC, for Plaintiff Sean Bauer in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Giovanni Brown in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Alexis Chavez in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Teddy Gorman in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Hampton Jenkins in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Sarah Midgett in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Patrick Norwood in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, James Romer in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Michael Salvo in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Donovan Snovel in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, James Stewart in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Howard Thomas, IV in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Paul Watson in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, Alex Wilkinson in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN.

Joshua Ryan Langdon Hooser, Hooser Legal Counsel, Charleston, SC, Thomas Michael Fernandez, Fernandez Law, Summerville, SC, Thomas William Winslow, Goldfinch Winslow LLC, Murrells Inlet, SC, for Plaintiffs Aaron Gdovicak in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Alexander Glover in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Andrew Lupisella in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Benjamin Pastva in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Brendan Schecker in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Brice Mack in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Carl David Grant in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Cecilia F. Leone in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Chris Edwards in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Craig Hamilton in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Dana Flanigan in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Edward Marshall Anderson in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Eric Glover in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Gerry Harter in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Hayley Bell in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Jane Doe in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, John Charles Petro in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, John Daniel Johnson in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, John Doe in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, John E. Baker in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, John McDonald in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Jonathan Massie in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Josh Turner in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Joshawa Daniel Bell in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Joshua Cor in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Justin Kahle in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Katelyn Brogan in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Kip Hibbard in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Kyle Gary Skeels in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Logan Face in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Matthew Brennan in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Matthew Wilson in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Michael Fedele in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Richard Walls in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, RJ Walls in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Robert Sacco in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Robert Tackett in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Scott Dabney in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Thomas McNamara in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Todd McCumbee in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Travis Doverspike in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Victor Kruzinsky in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, William James Towne in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Ashleigh Tucker in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Blake Alvey in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Chris P. Quinn in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, David Johnson in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Denise Cobb in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Debra Blum in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Elizabeth Moffat in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Jane Doe Dispatcher in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Jeffrey D. Watson in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Jennifer Sciarrotta in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, John Doe Deputy # 1 in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, John Doe Deputy # 2 in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Jonathan Jourdan in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Larry Donald Hall, Jr. in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Matthew Hutchinson in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, McKenzie Everham in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Paxton Chel Hatchell Prettel in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Shanna Mascia in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Stuart Joey Prettel, II in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Timothy Joseph Carroll in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Dale McCants, Jr. in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, John Christopher Adams in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Rickie Biggs in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Victor Richard Trantham, III in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Chris Herndon in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Damon Bevins in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Dustin Kreinbrook in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Jeremey Eardley in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Jonathan Flanagan in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Joseph Martin in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Kevin Frizzell in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Kody Capatosto in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Mark Ortiz in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Rusty Dean Grow, Jr. in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Travis A. Miller in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN.

Bob J. Conley, Cleveland and Conley, Caroline Wrenn Cleveland, Caroline Wrenn Cleveland Law Office, Charleston, SC, for Defendants R. Keith Summey in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN, John H. Tecklenburg in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, City of Charleston in 2:21-cv-03137-DCN, Anna B. Johnson in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Henry E. Darby in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Herbert Ravenel Sass, III in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Kylon Jerome Middleton in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Robert L. Wehrman in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN, Teddie E. Pryor, Sr. in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN.

Bob J. Conley, Cleveland and Conley, Caroline Wrenn Cleveland, Caroline Wrenn Cleveland Law Office, Donald Higgins Howe, Donald H. Howe Law Office, Charleston, SC, for Defendants Colleen Walz in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, St. John Fire District in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN.

Bob J. Conley, Cleveland and Conley, Caroline Wrenn Cleveland, Caroline Wrenn Cleveland Law Office, Charleston, SC, J. Brady Hair, Derk Bleckman Kekkert Van Raalte, IV, Law Office of Brady Hair, North Charleston, SC, for Defendant City of North Charleston in 2:21-cv-02952-DCN.

Natalie R. Armstrong, Solomon Law Group LLC, Columbia, SC, for Defendant Charleston County in 2:21-cv-03178-DCN.

Zachary Meade Kern, Clement Rivers LLP, Charleston, SC, for Debra Lehman in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Eric Britton in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Frank J. Broccolo in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Isiah White in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Leroy Blake in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Mary Jones in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Robert E. Wright in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, Stephen Rolando in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN, William Thomae in 2:21-cv-03192-DCN.

ORDER

DAVID C. NORTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The following matter is before the court on the motions for preliminary injunctions filed by plaintiffs in each of the above-captioned cases. Because the facts and law underlying the four cases are almost identical, the parties have agreed to consolidate the cases for the purpose of the court's resolution of the motions for preliminary injunctions. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motions.

I. BACKGROUND

This matter arises out of certain policies issued by the City of North Charleston, the City of Charleston, the County of Charleston, and the St. John Fire District imposing mandatory COVID-19 vaccine requirements on their employees and other affiliated personnel. Plaintiffs in each of the above-captioned actions filed suit against the respective government entities by whom they are employed or affiliated, challenging the COVID-19 vaccine mandates as violative of their rights under the United States and South Carolina Constitutions and under certain South Carolina statutes and common law. The court provides a brief summary of each of the challenged policies below.

A. The City of North Charleston Executive Order

On September 1, 2021, Mayor R. Keith Summey ("Mayor Summey"), in his capacity as the City of North Charleston's chief executive, signed and issued Executive Order Number 2021-0001 (the "Executive Order"). The Executive Order imposes a mandatory COVID-19 vaccine requirement on all City of North Charleston employees, volunteers, and interns, whether working on a full or part-time schedule. The Executive Order...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois – 2021
Halgren v. City of Naperville
"... ... it was "attempting through policy, to achieve a stated government purpose," rather than adjudicate disputed facts of a particular case); Bauer v. Summey , No. 21-CV-02952-DCN, 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 591 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2021) (noting that "public health orders ... are properly considered ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2021
Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
"... ... Newsom , No. 01-cv-01351-JST, 2021 WL 5410608, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2021) ; see also Bauer v. Summey , No. 2:21-CV-02952-DCN, 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 604–05 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2021) ; Valdez , 559 F.Supp.3d at 1181–82 ; Norris v. Stanley ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia – 2021
Church v. Biden
"... ... Ky. Sept. 24, 2021) ; Harsman v. Cincinnati Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. , No. 21-597, 2021 WL 4504245 at *4 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 30, 2021) ; Bauer v. Summey , 568 F. Supp. 3d 573, 604 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2020). 27 Cf. Order at 6, Robert v. Austin , No. 1:21-cv-2228, ECF No. 12 (D. Colo. Sept ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2022
McArthur v. Brabrand
"... ... Defendants cite several cases holding that unvaccinated people do not constitute a suspect class. See Bauer v. Summey , 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 597 (D.S.C. 2021) ("Although the Policies treat unvaccinated individuals differently than those vaccinated by only ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts – 2021
Together Emps. v. Mass Gen. Brigham Inc.
"... ... injury" because wrongful termination claims exist for the very reason to recover "monetary damages to compensate their loss of employment"); Bauer v. Summey , 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 604-05 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2021) (finding that economic harm from loss of employment due to COVID-19 vaccination mandate ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois – 2021
Halgren v. City of Naperville
"... ... it was "attempting through policy, to achieve a stated government purpose," rather than adjudicate disputed facts of a particular case); Bauer v. Summey , No. 21-CV-02952-DCN, 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 591 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2021) (noting that "public health orders ... are properly considered ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina – 2021
Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
"... ... Newsom , No. 01-cv-01351-JST, 2021 WL 5410608, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2021) ; see also Bauer v. Summey , No. 2:21-CV-02952-DCN, 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 604–05 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2021) ; Valdez , 559 F.Supp.3d at 1181–82 ; Norris v. Stanley ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia – 2021
Church v. Biden
"... ... Ky. Sept. 24, 2021) ; Harsman v. Cincinnati Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. , No. 21-597, 2021 WL 4504245 at *4 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 30, 2021) ; Bauer v. Summey , 568 F. Supp. 3d 573, 604 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2020). 27 Cf. Order at 6, Robert v. Austin , No. 1:21-cv-2228, ECF No. 12 (D. Colo. Sept ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2022
McArthur v. Brabrand
"... ... Defendants cite several cases holding that unvaccinated people do not constitute a suspect class. See Bauer v. Summey , 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 597 (D.S.C. 2021) ("Although the Policies treat unvaccinated individuals differently than those vaccinated by only ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts – 2021
Together Emps. v. Mass Gen. Brigham Inc.
"... ... injury" because wrongful termination claims exist for the very reason to recover "monetary damages to compensate their loss of employment"); Bauer v. Summey , 568 F.Supp.3d 573, 604-05 (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2021) (finding that economic harm from loss of employment due to COVID-19 vaccination mandate ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex