Sign Up for Vincent AI
Bloomberg v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.
Ria Julien, Jeanne Ellen Mirer, Mirer Mazzocchi Schalet & Julien, PLLC, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.
Andrea Mary O'Connor, Joseph Anci, William Andrew Grey, NYC Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel, New York, NY, for Defendants.
Plaintiff Jill Bloomberg – a high school principal – brings this action against the New York City Department of Education (the "DOE") and its chancellor. Bloomberg claims that a DOE investigation of her conduct – purportedly premised on her violation of a DOE regulation governing DOE personnel's activity on behalf of political organizations – was retaliatory and in violation of her First Amendment rights. Bloomberg further contends that the DOE regulation on which the investigation was based does not apply to her alleged conduct and, in any event, is unconstitutionally vague. The Amended Complaint asserts claims for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VI"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d-1 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL"), N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-101 et seq. Bloomberg also challenges the DOE regulation on Due Process grounds.
Defendants have moved to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amendment and Title VI claims, and her Due Process claim. (Mot. (Dkt. No. 77)) Plaintiff has cross-moved for partial judgment on the pleadings seeking, inter alia, a declaration as to the DOE regulation's scope.
For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motion to dismiss will be granted in its entirety, and Plaintiff's cross-motion will be terminated as withdrawn.
Plaintiff Bloomberg is the principal of Park Slope Collegiate ("PSC"), a secondary school in Park Slope, Brooklyn. (Am. Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 39) ¶¶ 1, 4, 21, 28) Plaintiff has served as the principal of PSC since 2004, and has been employed by the DOE since 1998. (Id. ¶¶ 9-10)
PSC is located at a facility known as the "John Jay Campus," The John Jay Campus houses PSC and three other schools: the Secondary School for Journalism ("Journalism"); The John Jay School for Law ("Law"); and Millennium Brooklyn High School ("Millennium"). (Id. ¶ 4; Bloomberg Aff., Ex. 3 (Dkt. No. 10-3)) Millennium joined the John Jay Campus in 2011. (Am. Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 39) ¶¶ 33, 36; Bloomberg Aff., Ex. 3 (Dkt. No. 10-3)) PSC's student body is 85 percent Black or Latino, while Millennium has a "high percentage" of white students, although the majority of the student body is Black or Latino.1 (Am. Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 39) ¶ 56) Park Slope – where the schools are located – is "an increasingly affluent neighborhood ... with a majority [w]hite population." (Id. ¶ 30)
"Since the outset of her tenure at PSC," Plaintiff "has encouraged desegregation of the school and opposed measures that reinforce and perpetuate de facto segregation." For example, Bloomberg opposed the addition of Millennium to the John Jay Campus. (Id. ¶ 32; see id. ¶¶ 33-52)
The Campus operates two sports programs. One program is for students at PSC, Journalism, Law, and a neighboring school – Brooklyn High School of the Arts ("Arts") – and the second program is for students at Millennium and Millennium-Manhattan. (Id. ¶ 56; Bloomberg Aff., Ex. 3 (Dkt. No. 10-3))
According to Plaintiff, (Bloomberg Supp. Aff. (Dkt. No. 21) ¶ 5)
On January 10, 2017, Plaintiff sent the following email to Eric Goldstein, the chief executive officer of the DOE sports programs, and Michael Prayor, the District Superintendent,2 concerning sports programs at the John Jay Campus:
(Bloomberg Aff., Ex. 3 (Dkt. No. 10-3))
The email includes the following chart:
School or Program Number of Enrollment % Black & Hispanic PSAL Teams (SY 15-16) [Law] 357 90.4 [Journalism] 222 87.0 PSC 356 (HS only) 85 [Arts] 924 90.7 John Jay Campus PSAL 9 1859 [Millennium] 620 51.5 [Millennium-Manhattan] 641 25.2 Millennium High School PSAL 17 1261
(Id. (emphasis in original)) The email goes on to state:
(Id. )
According to Plaintiff, her "primary protest" in this email "was the segregation of the programs based on race." (Am. Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 39) ¶ 57; see also id. ¶ 56 (); Bloomberg Supp. Aff. (Dkt. No. 21) ¶ 9 ())3
According to Plaintiff, she "received no meaningful response" to her January 10, 2017 email. (Id. ¶ 58) As a result, PSC's PTA organized a February 13, 2017 "leafleting action," distributing flyers containing language from the January 10, 2017 email on the sidewalk outside of the John Jay Campus building "to inform the community about the race discrimination and segregation that [P]laintiff had complained about." (Id. ¶ 59)
On March 3, 2017, Donald Douglas – the executive director of the PSAL, who had been copied on Plaintiff's January 10, 2017 email – met with the principals of the schools located at the John Jay Campus. Although he "refused to combine the programs between the PSC and other John Jay programs with the programs at Millennium," he did "grant[ ] John Jay an additional five teams," and asked Plaintiff "if that made [her] happy." (Bloomberg Supp. Aff. (Dkt. No. 21) ¶¶ 7, 10)
Plaintiff describes her January 10, 2017 email as a "Title VI Complaint." (Am. Cmplt. ¶ 59) Plaintiff further alleges, "[u]pon information and belief," that "all Title VI complaints made to DOE officials are immediately referred to the Office of Civil Rights (‘OCR’)." (Id. ¶ 60) Accordingly, "[b]ased on DOE policy and upon information and belief, [P]laintiff's Title VI Complaint ... was referred to OCR by at least on or about January 15, 2017." (Id. ¶ 61) Robin Greenfield – DOE's Executive Deputy Counsel for Employment and General Practice – is "directly responsible for responding to OCR complaints on behalf of DOE." (Id. ¶ 60)4
On May 12, 2016 – eight months before Plaintiff's January 10, 2017 email – the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District ("SCI") received an anonymous complaint concerning Plaintiff. SCI is independent of DOE, and its "sole function" "is to investigate allegations of corruption, conflicts of interest, unethical conduct[,] and other misconduct in the DOE." (Guerra Decl. (Dkt. No. 13) ¶¶ 6, 11; see also Am. Cmplt. (Dkt. No. 39) ¶¶ 69, 87) The anonymous complaint alleged that Plaintiff "was a member of a political organization known as the [Progressive] Labor Party (‘PLP’) and was actively recruiting students into the organization and inviting them to participate in organizational activities including marches for her...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting