Sign Up for Vincent AI
Bolat v. Bolat
Steven R. Dembo and Caitlin E. Kozloski, in support of the petition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 191 Conn. App. 293, 215 A.3d 736 (2019), is denied.
MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
1 cases
Wethington v. Wethington
"...is ambiguous." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Bolat v. Bolat, 191 Conn. App. 293, 298, 215 A.3d 736, cert. denied, 333 Conn. 918, 217 A.3d 634 (2019). We conclude that, pursuant to the clear and unambiguous terms of the stipulation, the plaintiff was entitled to the $46,000 escrowed am..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
1 cases
Wethington v. Wethington
"...is ambiguous." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Bolat v. Bolat, 191 Conn. App. 293, 298, 215 A.3d 736, cert. denied, 333 Conn. 918, 217 A.3d 634 (2019). We conclude that, pursuant to the clear and unambiguous terms of the stipulation, the plaintiff was entitled to the $46,000 escrowed am..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting