Case Law Bridges v. Department of Maryland State Police

Bridges v. Department of Maryland State Police

Document Cited Authorities (17) Cited in (145) Related (1)

Corey Lynn Stoughton, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York, for Appellants. Maureen Mullen Dove, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF:

Reginald Shuford, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York; Deborah A. Jeon, ACLU Foundation of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Christopher Brown, Brown, Goldstein & Levy, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland; William J. Mertens, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellants. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Elizabeth Marzo Borinsky, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS and Judge WILLIAMS joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge.

The Maryland State Conference of NAACP Branches ("NAACP") and 18 individuals commenced this class action on April 10, 1998, against the Maryland State Police and 24 of its officers for racially profiling minority motorists on Interstate 95 in Maryland. The plaintiffs requested declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, and attorneys fees.

After the district court entered an administrative order denying the plaintiffs' motion for class certification without prejudice to its later renewal, the representative parties abandoned their efforts to represent a class. Instead, they filed a motion to amend their complaint to add 18 individuals as new plaintiffs. By order dated July 26, 2004, the district court denied their motion to amend, concluding that the new parties could not be added to the case because their claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The 18 would-be plaintiffs then filed a motion on their own behalf, through counsel, for reconsideration, and by an order dated December 9, 2004, the district court also denied that motion. The plaintiffs and would-be plaintiffs appealed from the district court's orders denying the plaintiffs' motion to amend and denying the would-be plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration, challenging the district court's application of the statute of limitations.

Five months after the district court denied the motion for reconsideration and after the plaintiffs and would-be plaintiffs filed appeals, the plaintiffs and would-be plaintiffs filed...

5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit – 2021
N.C. State Conference of the NAACP v. Berger
"...a final judgment that is appealable.’ " Sharp Farms v. Speaks , 917 F.3d 276, 289 (4th Cir. 2019) (quoting Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police , 441 F.3d 197, 207 (4th Cir. 2006) ). This designation makes sense: "[F]rom the perspective of a disappointed prospective intervenor, the denial o..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2018
Chavez v. Occidental Chem. Corp.
"...continued to rely on the pending class action as protecting their interests. Occidental Br. at 19–20 (citing Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir. 2006) ). As the Second Circuit has held, only a decision definitively disallowing class status terminates American P..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit – 2020
N.C. State Conference of the NAACP v. Berger
"...as a final judgment that is appealable. See Sharp Farms v. Speaks , 917 F.3d 276, 289 (4th Cir. 2019) ; Bridges v. Dep't of Maryland State Police , 441 F.3d 197, 207 (4th Cir. 2006). Once the district court enters the order denying intervention, a party has 30 days to file a notice of appea..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit – 2011
Giovanniello v. ALM Media, LLC
"...denial of class certification. See Taylor v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 554 F.3d 510, 519 (5th Cir.2008); Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir.2006); Yang v. Odom, 392 F.3d 97, 102 (3d Cir.2004); Culver v. City of Milwaukee, 277 F.3d 908, 914 (7th Cir.2002); Ston..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa – 2012
Barkley v. Woodbury Cnty.
"...denial of class certification. See Taylor v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 554 F.3d 510, 519 (5th Cir.2008); Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir.2006); Yang v. Odom, 392 F.3d 97, 102 (3d Cir.2004); Culver v. City of Milwaukee, 277 F.3d 908, 914 (7th Cir.2002); Ston..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 books and journal articles
Document | Chapter 3 Appeals to the United States Court of Appeals
3.3 Prerequisites to Appeal
"...denying motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was not a final appealable order); Bridges v. Department of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 206 (4th Cir. 2006) (denial of a motion to amend a complaint is not a final order); Jenkins v. Medford, 119 F.3d 1156, 1159 (4th Cir. 1997)..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 firm's commentaries
Document | Mondaq United States – 2014
Caution To Investors: Second Circuit Holds That Securities Act Statute Of Repose Not Tolled
"...of repose applicable to the Securities Act of 1933 is subject to the American Pipe tolling rule); Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir. 2006) (describing the American Pipe tolling rule as an "equitable tolling rule"); Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd., 634 F.3d 524, 535 ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 books and journal articles
Document | Chapter 3 Appeals to the United States Court of Appeals
3.3 Prerequisites to Appeal
"...denying motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was not a final appealable order); Bridges v. Department of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 206 (4th Cir. 2006) (denial of a motion to amend a complaint is not a final order); Jenkins v. Medford, 119 F.3d 1156, 1159 (4th Cir. 1997)..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit – 2021
N.C. State Conference of the NAACP v. Berger
"...a final judgment that is appealable.’ " Sharp Farms v. Speaks , 917 F.3d 276, 289 (4th Cir. 2019) (quoting Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police , 441 F.3d 197, 207 (4th Cir. 2006) ). This designation makes sense: "[F]rom the perspective of a disappointed prospective intervenor, the denial o..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2018
Chavez v. Occidental Chem. Corp.
"...continued to rely on the pending class action as protecting their interests. Occidental Br. at 19–20 (citing Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir. 2006) ). As the Second Circuit has held, only a decision definitively disallowing class status terminates American P..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit – 2020
N.C. State Conference of the NAACP v. Berger
"...as a final judgment that is appealable. See Sharp Farms v. Speaks , 917 F.3d 276, 289 (4th Cir. 2019) ; Bridges v. Dep't of Maryland State Police , 441 F.3d 197, 207 (4th Cir. 2006). Once the district court enters the order denying intervention, a party has 30 days to file a notice of appea..."
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit – 2011
Giovanniello v. ALM Media, LLC
"...denial of class certification. See Taylor v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 554 F.3d 510, 519 (5th Cir.2008); Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir.2006); Yang v. Odom, 392 F.3d 97, 102 (3d Cir.2004); Culver v. City of Milwaukee, 277 F.3d 908, 914 (7th Cir.2002); Ston..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa – 2012
Barkley v. Woodbury Cnty.
"...denial of class certification. See Taylor v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 554 F.3d 510, 519 (5th Cir.2008); Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir.2006); Yang v. Odom, 392 F.3d 97, 102 (3d Cir.2004); Culver v. City of Milwaukee, 277 F.3d 908, 914 (7th Cir.2002); Ston..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 firm's commentaries
Document | Mondaq United States – 2014
Caution To Investors: Second Circuit Holds That Securities Act Statute Of Repose Not Tolled
"...of repose applicable to the Securities Act of 1933 is subject to the American Pipe tolling rule); Bridges v. Dep't of Md. State Police, 441 F.3d 197, 211 (4th Cir. 2006) (describing the American Pipe tolling rule as an "equitable tolling rule"); Albano v. Shea Homes Ltd., 634 F.3d 524, 535 ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial