Sign Up for Vincent AI
Brigman v. Schaum
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION DEFENDANT SCHAUM'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 23)
On August 28, 2020, Lloyd James Brigman (“Plaintiff”) initiated the above-captioned civil rights action arising out of an October 2019 arrest in York County, Pennsylvania for failing to respond to two traffic citations. In his Complaint, Plaintiff asserts claims against the following seven Defendants:
(Doc. 1).[1]
Presently pending before this Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Adam Schaum. (Doc. 23). On March 5, 2021, Defendant Schaum filed a brief in support. (Doc. 24). On May 5, 2021 Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition. (Doc. 37). On May 18 2021, Defendant Schaum filed a reply. (Doc. 38).
This matter has been referred to me to prepare a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After reviewing Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1), and the arguments raised in the parties' briefs, I RECOMMEND that Defendant Schaum's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff was charged with two summary traffic offenses: failure to pass in a lane not adjacent to that of an emergency response area in violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3327; and driving while his license was suspended or revoked in violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543. See Commonwealth v. Brigman, No. MJ-19311-TR-0002692-2019 (Magis. Ct.); Commonwealth v. Brigman, No. MJ-19311-TR-0002691-2019 (Magis. Ct.).[2]As to Defendant Schaum, Plaintiff alleges:
Plaintiff alleges that, after he was pulled over, he was transported by Defendant Schaum “and his gang” to the York County Jail. (Doc. 1, p. 4). Plaintiff reports that he was released the next morning, on October 8, 2019. Id.
On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff received summary trial notices listing Defendant Eckenrode as the Magisterial District Judge, scheduling a court dates on December 11, 2019 for both October 2019 traffic offenses. Id.; (Doc. 1-2, pp. 12, 14). On December 11, 2019, orders imposing sentence were sent to Plaintiff, informing him that his trial had been held in his absence, and that he had been found guilty of both traffic offenses. (Doc. 1-2, pp. 16-17). Pursuant to those orders, Plaintiff was fined $358.00 for driving with a suspended or revoked license, and $259.50 for passing improperly in an emergency response area. Id.
On January 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a summary appeal in both cases. See Commonwealth v. Brigman, No. MJ-19311-TR-0002692-2019 (Magis. Ct.); Commonwealth v. Brigman, No. MJ-19311-TR-0002691-2019 (Magis. Ct.). Defendant Kraft was assigned the role of presiding judge in the summary appeal. Commonwealth v. Brigman, No. CP-67-SA-0000020-2020 (C.C.P. York County). The docket in this case suggests that Plaintiff entered a guilty plea on July 30, 2020. Id. Plaintiff alleges he did not enter a guilty plea.
On August 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed this pro se civil Complaint in federal court alleging violations of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff paid the filing fee and served the Complaint. On February 22, 2021, Defendant Schaum filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 23). On March 5, 2021, Defendant Schaum filed a supporting brief (Doc. 24). On May 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition. (Doc. 37). On May 18, 2021, Defendant Schaum filed a reply. (Doc. 38).
As relief, Plaintiff generally asks that all Defendants “receive their just deserts [sic]” and for reimbursement of court costs and lost wages. (Doc. 1, p. 2). As to Defendant Schaum, Plaintiff specifically requests “$11, 500, 000.00 dollars in gold and silver.” (Doc. 1, p. 5).
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting