Case Law Brown v. State

Brown v. State

Document Cited Authorities (8) Cited in (2) Related

Johnny Mack Brown, for Appellant.

Richard Ashley Mallard, Keith A. McIntyre, Statesboro, Daphne Jarriel Totten, for Appellee.

McMillian, Judge. On March 13, 2013, appellant Johnny M. Brown entered a negotiated guilty plea to five counts of child molestation. The trial court sentenced Brown to ten years to serve on Count 1 and probation on the remaining counts, for a total sentence of forty years, with the first ten years to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation. On September 21, 2017, Brown filed a motion to correct void sentence based on the trial court’s alleged failure to follow the requirements of former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) in sentencing him.1 The trial court denied Brown’s motion, and Brown filed this appeal. As more fully set forth below, we now vacate Brown’s sentence and remand for resentencing.

Under the version of the statute in effect in 2013 when Brown was sentenced,2 the trial court was required to sentence Brown to a "split-sentence" consisting of a minimum term of imprisonment, as specified in the Code section for the offense of child molestation, followed by an additional probated sentence of at least one year on each offense. Former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) ; State v. Riggs , 301 Ga. 63, 64 (1), 799 S.E.2d 770 (2017) ; Jackson v. State , 338 Ga. App. 509, 510-11, 790 S.E.2d 295 (2016) ; McCranie v. State , 335 Ga. App. 548, 555 (4), 782 S.E.2d 453 (2016) ; Daniels v. State , 344 Ga. App. 190, 191-92, 809 S.E.2d 473 (2018). Here, the trial court sentenced Brown to confinement only on Count 1 and to probation only on the remaining four counts.3 The State concedes that Brown was not sentenced as required by former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b), but points out that the trial court had discretion under subsection (c) of relevant version of that code section to deviate from the mandates of subsection (b) under certain circumstances, and urges us to remand to the trial court so that the trial court can make findings concerning whether it had reason to deviate in this case. However, subpart (2) of former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (c) requires the trial court to issue a written order setting forth the reasons for any deviation in sentencing pursuant to this section, and the trial court did not enter such an order in this case. See Jackson , 338 Ga. App. at 510-11, 790 S.E.2d 295 ; McCranie , 335 Ga. App. at 555-56 (4), 782 S.E.2d 453 ; Daniels , 344 Ga. App. at 191-92, 809 S.E.2d 473. In the absence of anything in the record to indicate that the trial court intended to deviate from the mandatory minimum as allowed by the applicable version of OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (c),4 the proper remedy is to vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Although Brown does not raise as error the probation only sentences for child molestation,5 we also note that former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b) required that the sentence for any person convicted of a sexual offense include the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment specified in the code section for that offense and "no portion of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed shall be suspended, stayed, or probated ..." Former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). As we explained above, there was no indication that the trial court entered written findings necessary to deviate from the mandatory minimum. Therefore, those sentences are void for this additional reason. Accordingly, we vacate Brown’s sentence and remand to the trial court for entry of a new sentence on each count as required by former OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b).6

Sentence vacated and case remanded for resentencing.

Barnes, P. J., and Reese, J., concur.

1 We note that a void sentence may be attacked at any time, even in cases where the sentence was entered on a guilty plea, and that a direct appeal will lie from the denial of a motion to correct or vacate a void sentence where the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is in fact void. McCranie v. State , 335 Ga. App. 548, 555 (4), 782 S.E.2d 453 (2016).

2 Brown was sentenced on April 12, 2013, and he moved to correct his void sentence on September 21, 2017. We note that a void sentence may be vacated at any time and a challenge to such a sentence is not waived. "[A] sentence is void if the court imposes punishment the law does not allow." New v. State , 327 Ga. App. 87, 106 (5), 755 S.E.2d 568 (2014).

3 The sentencing provisions applicable to the offense of child molestation are set out in OCGA § 16-6-4 (b).

4 After Brown was sentenced, OCGA §...

3 cases
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2019
State v. McCauley
"...generally, a sentence that is void may be vacated at any time and a challenge to such a sentence is not waived. Brown v. State , 345 Ga. App. 622, 623, 814 S.E.2d 738 (2018). But see Dixon v. State , 302 Ga. 691, 808 S.E.2d 696 (2017) (holding that in the context of merger, when a sentencin..."
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2018
Brock v. Hardman
"...303 Ga. 729814 S.E.2d 736BROCKv.HARDMAN.S18A0393Supreme Court of Georgia.Decided: May 21, 2018James L Brock, III, GDC # 0001186350, Smith State Prison, P.O. Box 726, Glennville, Georgia 30427, for Appellant.Ann Hardman, Clerk's Office, Muscogee County Superior Court, P.O. Box 2145, Columbus, ... "
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2024
Thomas v. State
"...note that the trial court applied the wrong version of the statute based on dicta from our decision in Brown v. State, 345 Ga. App. 622, 623, 814 S.E.2d 738 (2018). Dicta, however, "is not binding on anyone for any purpose." Alexander v. State, 313 Ga. 521, 529 (3), 870 S.E.2d 729 (2022).3O..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2019
State v. McCauley
"...generally, a sentence that is void may be vacated at any time and a challenge to such a sentence is not waived. Brown v. State , 345 Ga. App. 622, 623, 814 S.E.2d 738 (2018). But see Dixon v. State , 302 Ga. 691, 808 S.E.2d 696 (2017) (holding that in the context of merger, when a sentencin..."
Document | Georgia Supreme Court – 2018
Brock v. Hardman
"...303 Ga. 729814 S.E.2d 736BROCKv.HARDMAN.S18A0393Supreme Court of Georgia.Decided: May 21, 2018James L Brock, III, GDC # 0001186350, Smith State Prison, P.O. Box 726, Glennville, Georgia 30427, for Appellant.Ann Hardman, Clerk's Office, Muscogee County Superior Court, P.O. Box 2145, Columbus, ... "
Document | Georgia Court of Appeals – 2024
Thomas v. State
"...note that the trial court applied the wrong version of the statute based on dicta from our decision in Brown v. State, 345 Ga. App. 622, 623, 814 S.E.2d 738 (2018). Dicta, however, "is not binding on anyone for any purpose." Alexander v. State, 313 Ga. 521, 529 (3), 870 S.E.2d 729 (2022).3O..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex