Camaiore v. Farance

184 A.D.3d 561

122 N.Y.S.3d 910 (Mem)

In the Matter of Marguerite CAMAIORE, Respondent,

v.Frank FARANCE, Appellant.

2019–02560

2019–02826

Docket No. F–4307–13/17G

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—March 17, 2020

June 3, 2020

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, NY, for appellant.

Marguerite Camaiore, Astoria, NY, respondent pro se.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Joan L. Piccirillo, J.), dated September 10, 2018, and (2) a modified order of commitment of the same court (Dean T. Kusakabe, J.), dated February 14, 2019. The order dated September 10, 2018, denied the father's objections to amended findings of fact of the same court (Solange N. Grey–Humphreys, S.M.) dated July 18, 2018, and, in effect, confirmed so much of an order of disposition of the same court (Solange N. Grey–Humphreys, S.M.) dated April 23, 2018, made after a hearing, as determined that the father willfully violated a prior order of child support. The modified order of commitment dated February 14, 2019, upon confirmation of the determination that the father willfully violated a prior order of child support, committed the father to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for a period of six months unless he paid the purge amount of $7,500.

ORDERED that the order dated September 10, 2018, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the modified order of commitment as committed the father to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for a period of six months is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the period of incarceration has expired (see Matter of Konig v. Fabrizio, 176 A.D.3d 1066, 108 N.Y.S.3d 883 ); and it is further,

ORDERED that the modified order of commitment is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother, the custodial parent of the parties' two children, commenced this proceeding alleging that the father was in willful violation of an order of child support dated August 4, 2016, obligating him to pay the sum of $924 per month for the support of the parties' two children. On April 23, 2018, after a hearing, the Support Magistrate issued findings of fact and an order of disposition, finding that the father was in willful violation of the prior order of child...