Case Law Cambridge Univ. Press v. Becker

Cambridge Univ. Press v. Becker

Document Cited Authorities (8) Cited in (1) Related

Edward Bryan Krugman, John H. Rains, IV, Bondurant Mixson & Elmore, LLP, Atlanta, GA, Jonathan Bloom, Pro Hac Vice, R. Bruce Rich, Randi W. Singer, Pro Hac Vice, Todd D. Larson, Weil Gotshal & Manges, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Katrina M. Quicker, Baker Hostetler, LLP, Stephen M. Schaetzel, Anthony B. Askew, Lisa Pavento, Mary Katherine Bates, Meunier Carlin & Curfman, LLC, John Weldon Harbin, Natasha Horne Moffitt, King & Spalding, LLP, Mary Josephine Leddy Volkert, State of Georgia Law Department, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants.

ORDER

ORINDA D. EVANS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Table of Contents

I. The Case on Remand...1230

II. Preliminary Matters...1236

III. FAIR USE ANALYSIS FOR INDIVIDUAL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS...1239

A. Professor Kaufmann...1239
Maymester 2009: EPRS 8500
1. The Craft of Inquiry (Oxford)...1239
2. Handbook of Feminist Research (Sage)...1241
3. Handbook of Social Theory (Sage)...1241
4. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third) (Sage)...1246
5. Handbook of Critical & Indigenous Methodologies (Sage)...1248
6. Handbook of Narrative Inquiry (Sage)...1250
Summer 2009: EPRS 8510
7. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Second) (Sage)...1252
Fall 2009: EPRS 8500
8. The Craft of Inquiry (Oxford)...1255
9. Approaches to Qualitative Research (Sage)...1255
10. Handbook of Feminist Research (Sage)...1257
11. Handbook of Narrative Inquiry (Sage)...1259
12. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Third) (Sage)...1261
13. Handbook of Social Theory (Sage)...1263
B. Professor Esposito...1263
Summer 2009: EPSF 8280
14. Handbook of Feminist Research (Sage)...1264
15. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Second) (Sage)...1266
16. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (First) (Sage)...1269
Fall 2009: EPRS 8520
17. Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research (Sage)...1271
C. Professor Kruger...1273
Summer & Fall 2009: EPY 7090
18. Awakening Children's Minds (Oxford)...1273
Fall 2009: EPY 8220
19. Understanding Trauma (Cambridge)...1275
D. Professor Orr...1277
Summer 2009: MUS 8860
20. Liszt: Sonata in B Minor (Cambridge)...1277
21. The Cambridge Companion to Mendelssohn (Cambridge)...1278
22. The Cambridge Companion to Schumann (Cambridge)...1280
23. The Music of Berlioz (Oxford)...1281
Fall 2009: MUS 8840
24. The Organ as a Mirror of Its Time (Oxford)...1282
E. Professor Dixon...1283
Fall 2009: AAS 3000
25. The Slave Community (Oxford)...1284
26. African American Single Mothers (Sage)...1286
27. Black Children (Sage)...1289
28. Black Families (Third) (Sage)...1291
F. Professor Hartwig...1295
Fall 2009: AH 4900
29. Ancient Egyptian Materials & Technology (Cambridge)...1295
G. Professor Kim...1296
Fall 2009: AL 8550
30. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing (Oxford)...1296
31. Assessing Speaking (Cambridge)...1298
32. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (Cambridge)...1300
H. Professor McCombie...1301
Fall 2009: ANTH 4440
33. International Health Organisations (Cambridge)...1301
34. Evolution of Infectious Disease (Oxford)...1303
I. Professor Anggoro...1304
Fall 2009: EPY 8960
35. Language Acquisition & Conceptual Development (Cambridge)...1304
J. Professor Davis...1306
Fall 2009: HIST 7010
36. Region, Race & Reconstruction (Oxford)...1307
37. The Unpredictable Past (Oxford)...1309
K. Professor Freeman...1310
Fall 2009: JOUR 4800
38. Living Ethics (Oxford)...1310
L. Professor Moloney...1312
Fall 2009: NURS 8035
39. Handbook of Mixed Methods (Sage)...1312
M. Professor Lasner...1314
Fall 2009: PERS 2001
40. Crabgrass Frontier (Oxford)...1315
41. The Politics of Public Housing (Oxford)...1317
N. Professor Hankla...1318
Fall 2009: POLS 3450
42. Contemporary Cases in U.S. Foreign Policy (Sage)...1319
43. U.S. Foreign Policy (Sage)...1321
O. Professor McCoy...1323
Fall 2009: POLS 8250
44. Regimes & Democracy in Latin America (Oxford)...1323
P. Professor Whitten...1325
Fall 2009: PSYC 4030
45. A World of Babies (Cambridge)...1325
Q. Professor Harvey...1327
Fall 2009: SOCI 8030
46. The Power Elite (Oxford)...1327
R. Professor Ohmer...1330
Fall 2009: SW 8200
47. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Second) (Sage)...1330
48. Utilization-Focused Evaluation (Sage)...1332

IV. Summary...1336

V. Relief To Be Granted...1336

VI. Costs and Attorneys' Fees...1336

ATTACHMENT: Permissions and Book Sales Revenue for Books Involved on Remand

I. The Case on Remand

This copyright infringement case is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The case was previously tried to the undersigned sitting without a jury in May 2011. An Order1 containing findings of fact and conclusions of law and final judgment was entered on May 11, 2012 [Doc. 423]. A final judgment was entered on September 30, 2012 [Doc. 463]. On appeal, Defendants Mark P. Becker, Risa Palm, J.L. Albert, Nancy Seamans, Robert F. Hatcher, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr., Larry R. Ellis, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr., James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr., William Nesmith, Jr., Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr., C. Dean Alford, Kessel Stelling, Jr., Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Larry Walker, Rutledge A. Griffin, Jr., C. Thomas Hopkins, Jr., and Philip A. Wilheit, Sr.2 (collectively, "Defendants") prevailed on most of the claims,3 either because Plaintiffs Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, Inc., and Sage Publications, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") did not establish a prima facie case or because Defendants succeeded on their fair use defense. Plaintiffs did not appeal this Court's rulings that no prima facie case had been established for 26 of the claims. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part this Court's overall fair use analysis; it announced some additional holdings governing fair use and the case was remanded with direction. Op. at 3, 112; Patton at 1284. As a result this Court must revisit the fair use analysis for 48 infringement claims.

Briefly, the fair use defense in this case centers on a program at Georgia State University ("Georgia State") which allows a professor to make small excerpts of copyrighted books available to students enrolled in his or her class without paying royalties or other fees to the publisher.4 A fair use checklist is provided to assist in selecting the excerpts. The excerpts typically supplement an assigned textbook which students must purchase. Georgia State librarians scan the designated excerpts and upload them to a server. Class members then may download the excerpts to their computers and print them. The students must acknowledge and agree to respect the copyrighted nature of the materials. Some students bring the printed excerpts to class; others may read them in class on their computers. At the end of the course students' access to the electronic excerpts ends.

Plaintiffs argue that students' unpaid use of the excerpts infringes their copyrights, cutting into their revenues and diminishing the value of their copyrights. Defendants argue that Georgia State's program is sanctioned by the fair use section of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 107. They argue that all of Plaintiffs' infringement claims are barred by the defense of fair use. Plaintiffs disagree.

The trial evidence showed that Defendants could have purchased licenses (also called permissions) to make digital copies of some of the excerpts from either the Copyright Clearance Center or Plaintiffs directly. The fair use analysis, as determined by the Court of Appeals, makes it harder, but by no means impossible, for Defendants to establish fair use where such licenses were available but were not purchased.

The fair use doctrine is codified at 17 U.S.C. § 107, as follows:

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

17 U.S.C. § 107.

In reversing this Court's Order, the Court of Appeals held as follows:

(1) This...

1 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia – 2019
United States v. Adams
"... ... Kaplan Univ. , 780 F.3d 1039, 1051 (11th Cir. 2015). 2. Whether the Complaint ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia – 2019
United States v. Adams
"... ... Kaplan Univ. , 780 F.3d 1039, 1051 (11th Cir. 2015). 2. Whether the Complaint ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex