Legislation California Session Laws US session laws and acts Chapter 665, AB 1114 – Inmates: involuntary administration of psychotropic medications

Chapter 665, AB 1114 – Inmates: involuntary administration of psychotropic medications

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in Related

CA AB 1114; Chapter 665

California Acts of the 2011 Legislative Session

AB 1114, Chapter 665

BILL NUMBER: AB 1114 CHAPTERED 10/09/11 CHAPTER 665 FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE OCTOBER 9, 2011 APPROVED BY GOVERNOR OCTOBER 9, 2011 PASSED THE SENATE AUGUST 31, 2011 PASSED THE ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 15, 2011 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 7, 2011 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 28, 2011 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 6, 2011 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Bonnie Lowenthal FEBRUARY 18, 2011 An act to amend Section 2600 of, and to add Section 2602 to, the Penal Code, relating to inmates

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1114, Bonnie Lowenthal. Inmates: involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.

Existing law provides that a person sentenced to imprisonment in a state prison may be deprived of rights only as is reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. Existing law states that nothing in this provision shall be construed to permit the involuntary administration of psychotropic medication unless the process specified in Keyhea v. Rushen (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 526 has been followed. Existing law further requires that this process be conducted by an administrative law judge.

This bill would delete the provision regarding the medication process specified in Keyhea v. Rushen. The bill would instead provide that no inmate shall be administered psychotropic medication on a nonemergency basis without the inmate's informed consent, unless after a noticed hearing is conducted in which an administrative law judge determines by clear and convincing evidence that the inmate has a mental illness or disorder, that as a result of that illness the inmate is gravely disabled and lacks the capacity to consent or refuse treatment or is a danger to self or others if not medicated, that there is no less intrusive alternative to involuntary medication, and that the medication is in the inmate's best medical interest.

The bill would provide that it is not intended to prohibit a physician from taking appropriate action in an emergency, as specified, and would require notice of a hearing to be filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings within 72 hours of administering medication on an emergency basis. When medication is administered on an emergency basis, the bill would require the hearing to commence within 21 days of the filing. The bill would provide that an order providing for the involuntary administration of psychotropic medication shall be valid for one year from the date the determination is made, and that the order may be renewed annually at subsequent hearings before an administrative law judge, as provided.

In each case, this bill would require that the inmate be provided with written notice, as specified, and appointed counsel at least 21 days prior to the hearing. The bill would provide that an inmate is entitled to file one motion for reconsideration following a determination that he or she may receive involuntary medication and may seek a hearing to present new evidence, upon good cause shown.

This bill would incorporate changes to Section 2600 of the Penal Code made by AB 109, which has been chaptered but is not operative, to become operative only if AB 109 becomes operative.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1.
...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex