Case Law Chester Upland Sch. Dist. v. Rossi

Chester Upland Sch. Dist. v. Rossi

Document Cited Authorities (19) Cited in (4) Related

Marc A. Zaid, King of Prussia, for Petitioners.

Devin J. Chwastyk, Harrisburg, for Respondents.

Eric J. Schreiner, Philadelphia, for Respondent Mary J. Walk in the official capacity as the Director of Office of Judicial Support of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania.

BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCULLOUGH, Judge, HONORABLE LORI A. DUMAS, Judge, HONORABLE MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, Senior Judge

OPINION BY JUDGE McCULLOUGH

On April 26, 2021, Chester Upland School District and Chichester School District (Petitioners) initiated this putative class action under Rules 1701 - 1717 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure ( Pa. R.Civ.P. 1701 - 1717 ) on behalf of themselves and all political subdivisions similarly situated by filing a petition for review1 against the Director of the Office of Judicial Support (OJS) of the County of Delaware2 and fifty-two prothonotaries of courts of common pleas in counties of the second class A, the third through eighth classes, and home rule counties, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and monetary damages for allegedly overcharging court fees in excess of the limitations contained in what is commonly referred to as the Prothonotary Fee Act, 42 P.S. §§ 21071,3 210754 (for third through eighth class counties and home rule counties) and 42 P.S. §§ 21161,5 211656 (for second class A counties). Presently before the Court are preliminary objections (POs) filed by the Prothonotaries of Beaver, Bedford, Berks, Blair, Bradford, Bucks, Butler, Cambria, Carbon, Centre, Chester, Clarion, Clearfield, Clinton, Columbia, Crawford, Cumberland, Fayette, Forest, Franklin, Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Jefferson, Juniata, Lackawanna, Luzerne, Lycoming, McKean, Mifflin, Monroe, Montour, Northampton, Northumberland, Perry, Pike, Schuylkill, Snyder, Sullivan, Tioga, Union, Venango, Warren, Washington, Wayne, Westmoreland, Wyoming and York Counties (collectively, Respondents).

I. Background

Petitioners are two political subdivisions located in Delaware County. (Amended Petition, ¶¶ 2-3.) Petitioners seek to represent a proposed class of all political subdivisions, as defined by 101 Pa. Code § 23.226 ("school districts, municipalities, and counties, as applicable"), throughout the entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania which have in the preceding four years filed a document in any of the RespondentsCourts of Common Pleas and which were charged fees "in excess of the statutorily set fees." Id. ¶¶ 64, 70. There are in excess of 3,000 members in the proposed class definition. Id . ¶ 72.

Each of the parties constituting a Respondent is a Prothonotary, or counterpart, of a home rule county or county of the second class A or of the third to eighth class. Id . ¶ 65. Petitioners assert that

66. Pursuant to Pennsylvania law relating to a county of Class 2 A through Class 8, the maximum fee to be charged to the Commonwealth or a political subdivision for any one of the services provided herein shall be $10. 42 P.S. § 21075 ; 42 P.S. § 21165.
67. Upon information and belief, during the period of time from the respective effective dates of 42 P.S. § 21075 (during 1982) and 42
...
1 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania – 2023
Salvitti v. Lascelles
"...to enforce a contract, and a party's restitution interest, which seeks to prevent unjust enrichment); Chester Upland Sch. Dist. v. Rossi, 275 A.3d 1117, 1128-29 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022) (dismissing a class action petition for unjust enrichment by means of a county's overcharging for court fees..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania – 2023
Salvitti v. Lascelles
"...to enforce a contract, and a party's restitution interest, which seeks to prevent unjust enrichment); Chester Upland Sch. Dist. v. Rossi, 275 A.3d 1117, 1128-29 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022) (dismissing a class action petition for unjust enrichment by means of a county's overcharging for court fees..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex