Sign Up for Vincent AI
Chitwood v. Gipson
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent is represented by Doris A. Calandra of the office of the California Attorney General. The parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF Nos. 8, 10.)
Petitioner is currently in the custody of the California Department of Corrections pursuant to a judgment of the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, following his conviction by jury trial on June 24, 2010, of first degree murder with the personal use of a firearm resulting in death. (Clerk's Tr. at 1115-16.) On July 19, 2010, the trial court sentenced Petitioner to serve an indeterminate term of life without the possibility of parole and twenty-five years to life. (Id.)
Petitioner's direct appeal, filed with the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, was denied on February 23, 2012. (Lodged Docs. 1-4.) Petitioner filed a petition for review with the California Supreme Court. (Lodged Doc. 5.) The Supreme Court summarily denied the petition on May 9, 2012. (Lodged Doc. 6.)
Petitioner proceeded to file post-conviction collateral appeals in the form of petitions for writ of habeas corpus in the Kern County Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District and the California Supreme Court. The petitions were denied on September 21, 2012, November 7, 2012, and November 13, 2013, respectively. (Lodged Docs. 7-10, 15-16.)
Petitioner filed the instant federal habeas petition on April 5, 2013. (Pet., ECF No. 1. ) Petitioner proceeded to file an amended petition on September 18, 2013. (Am. Pet., ECF No. 17.) In his amended petition, Petitioner presents five claims for relief: (1) that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated during the search of Petitioner during his arrest; (2) that his Fourth amendment rights were violated as he was subject to an unlawful arrest and illegal car stop; (3) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to hire a DNA expert to test or retest physical evidence in light of possible cross-contamination; (4) that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to hire a DNA expert to test DNA for third-party culpability; and (5) that the court erred in admitting the testimony of the prosecution's DNA expert.
Respondent filed an answer to the petition on March 21, 2014, and Petitioner filed a traverse on April 25, 2014. (Answer & Traverse, ECF Nos. 27-28.)
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting