Sign Up for Vincent AI
Clarity Sports Int'l LLC v. Redland Sports
MEMORANDUM
Before the Court in the above-captioned action is the March 8, 2024 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc No. 388) (the “Report and Recommendation”) recommending that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs Jason Bernstein and Clarity Sports International LLC (“Plaintiffs”)' motion for sanctions against Defendants CAA Sports LLC (“CAA”) Redland Sports and Gerry Ochs (“Redland/Ochs”), Boone Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Boone Enterprises Authentic Autographs and Craig Boone (the “Boone Defendants”). Also pending before the Court is Redland/Ochs' motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 42 for separate trial or separate jury (“motion to bifurcate”). (Doc. No. 408.) Upon consideration of the briefing filed in connection with the motion for sanctions, the Report and Recommendation, the parties' objections to the Report and Recommendation, the briefing related to those objections, and the applicable law, and for the reasons provided herein, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation and grant Plaintiffs' motion in part. The Court will deny Redland/Ochs' motion to bifurcate.
On July 17, 2020, Plaintiffs filed their operative Third Amended Complaint alleging that CAA, Redland/Ochs, the Boone Defendants, and MVP Authentics, LLC, Daryl Eisenhour, and Jason Smith (“MVP”) tortiously interfered with Plaintiffs' representation, endorsement, and marketing agreements with National Football League (“NFL”) wide receiver Kenny Golladay (“Golladay”) by participating in a January 2019 Autograph Signing (the “Signing Event”), after which Golladay terminated his representation by Plaintiffs and signed with CAA. (Doc. No. 120.) Prior to the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, the case was referred to Magistrate Judge Schwab for pretrial management. (Doc. No. 82.) The Court has little doubt that the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case and therefore, the Court will only briefly discuss the facts before addressing the procedural history relevant to the instant motion.
In a related appeal resulting in the vacatur of an arbitration award granted in favor of former CAA Sports agent Todd France (“France”) and against Plaintiff Bernstein,[1]the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (“Third Circuit”) provided a brief overview of the principal conduct upon which Plaintiffs' claims are based. Because the Third Circuit's statement provides a helpful background of the circumstances giving rise to this action, it is quoted in full below:
See France v. Bernstein, 43 F.4th 367, 371 (3d Cir. 2022) (footnotes omitted).
(J.A. at 1833.)
See France, 43 F.4th at 371, 374-75 (footnotes omitted). Based on the above, the Third Circuit reversed and remanded to this Court for entry of an order vacating the arbitration award because the arbitration award was procured by fraud. See id. at 382.
As to the discovery process in the instant case, the parties engaged in what Magistrate Judge Carlson describes as “a painfully prolonged, and frequently contentious course of discovery, which spanned from 2019 through 2022.”[2](Doc. No. 388 at 6.) A review of the docket in this case reflects that Magistrate Judge Schwab issued eleven (11) case management orders (Doc. Nos. 84, 85, 166 184, 202, 211, 220, 247, 260, 266, 279)[3]and issued Orders (Doc. Nos. 74, 190, 192, 251, 261, 280, 283, 285) on various motions to compel and...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting