Sign Up for Vincent AI
Com. v. Mitchell
Lynn E. Ober, Leesport, for appellant.
Andrew J. Serina, Asst. District Atty., Pottsville, for Com., appellee.
¶ 1 Appellant, Steven W. Mitchell, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed on December 29, 2003, following his conviction by jury of kidnapping, aggravated assault, and related offenses. The trial court imposed an aggregate prison term of five to ten years. We affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court described the factual background of the case as follows:
5 cases
Commonwealth v. Stokes
"... ... See Apprendi, supra at 487 n. 13, 120 S.Ct. 2348; Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096 (Pa.Super.2005) (discussing Apprendi, Blakely, and the binding nature of McMillan and upholding the constitutionality of 42 ... "
Com. v. Kleinicke
"... ... § 9712. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096 (Pa.Super.2005) ... 2. The guideline sentencing form in the record indicates that Appellant was sentenced to five to ten years imprisonment. However, this form is incorrect because the maximum statutory sentence in this case, as outlined above, was five years imprisonment. In ... "
Com. v. Jacobs
"... ... Kleinicke, 2006 PA Super 48, 895 A.2d 562 (en banc) (imposition of mandatory minimum sentence did not violate Apprendi or Blakely because Pennsylvania has an indeterminate sentencing scheme); Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096 (Pa.Super.2005) (same). In short, we do not read Roney as announcing a radical expansion in the class of cases that implicate the legality of the sentence ... 7. A number of appellate cases have granted relief on the merits of an allocution issue without mentioning waiver. For ... "
Commonwealth of Pa. v. Mckellick
"... ... In addition, it is the exclusive province of the finder of fact to determine the weight of relevant evidence. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096, 1110–1111 (Pa.Super.2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 688, 897 A.2d 454 (2006). Whether a ... "
Commonwealth v. McKellick, 906 EDA 2010
"...In addition, it is the exclusive province of the finder of fact to determine the weight of relevant evidence. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096, 1110-1111 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 688, 897 A.2d 454 (2006).Whether a defendant has been denied his righ..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Commonwealth v. Stokes
"... ... See Apprendi, supra at 487 n. 13, 120 S.Ct. 2348; Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096 (Pa.Super.2005) (discussing Apprendi, Blakely, and the binding nature of McMillan and upholding the constitutionality of 42 ... "
Com. v. Kleinicke
"... ... § 9712. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096 (Pa.Super.2005) ... 2. The guideline sentencing form in the record indicates that Appellant was sentenced to five to ten years imprisonment. However, this form is incorrect because the maximum statutory sentence in this case, as outlined above, was five years imprisonment. In ... "
Com. v. Jacobs
"... ... Kleinicke, 2006 PA Super 48, 895 A.2d 562 (en banc) (imposition of mandatory minimum sentence did not violate Apprendi or Blakely because Pennsylvania has an indeterminate sentencing scheme); Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096 (Pa.Super.2005) (same). In short, we do not read Roney as announcing a radical expansion in the class of cases that implicate the legality of the sentence ... 7. A number of appellate cases have granted relief on the merits of an allocution issue without mentioning waiver. For ... "
Commonwealth of Pa. v. Mckellick
"... ... In addition, it is the exclusive province of the finder of fact to determine the weight of relevant evidence. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096, 1110–1111 (Pa.Super.2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 688, 897 A.2d 454 (2006). Whether a ... "
Commonwealth v. McKellick, 906 EDA 2010
"...In addition, it is the exclusive province of the finder of fact to determine the weight of relevant evidence. Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 883 A.2d 1096, 1110-1111 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 688, 897 A.2d 454 (2006).Whether a defendant has been denied his righ..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting