Sign Up for Vincent AI
Commonwealth v. Kuilan
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT O.P. 65.37
Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered February 21, 2023 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0006572-2021
Benjamin D. Kohler, Esq.
BEFORE: LAZARUS, J., KUNSELMAN, J., and PELLEGRINI J.[*]
Andy Kuilan (Kuilan) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) after his bench trial convictions for third-degree murder, persons not to possess firearms, firearms not to be carried without a license, carrying firearms in Philadelphia, possession of an instrument of crime and recklessly endangering another person.[1] On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency and the weight of the evidence. We affirm.
The trial court summarized the evidence presented at Kuilan's trial as follows:
Trial Court Opinion (TCO), 5/9/23, at 2-4 (cleaned up).
At the end of the trial, the trial court found Kuilan guilty of the above offenses and later sentenced him to an aggregate term of 26 to 52 years' imprisonment.[2] After the trial court denied his post-sentence motion, Kuilan filed this appeal to assert that his third-degree murder conviction was against the sufficiency and weight of the evidence.
Kuilan first claims that the Commonwealth presented insufficient evidence to convict him of third-degree murder.
Commonwealth v. Sebolka, 205 A.3d 329, 336-37 (Pa. Super. 2019).
Third-degree murder is defined by the Crimes Code as "all other kinds of murder" other than first-degree murder or second-degree murder. 18 Pa.C.S. § 2502(c). While Section 2502(c) does not set forth the requisite mens rea for third-degree murder, Section 302(c) of the Crimes Code provides: "When the culpability sufficient to establish a material element of an offense is not prescribed by law, such element is established if a person acts intentionally, knowingly[,] or recklessly with respect thereto." 18 Pa.C.S. § 302(c). "The elements of third-degree murder, as developed by case law, are a killing done with legal malice." Commonwealth v. Marquez, 980 A.2d 145, 148 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citation omitted). "Malice exists where there is a particular ill-will, and also where 'there is a wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, wanton conduct, cruelty, recklessness of consequences[,] and a mind regardless of social duty.'" Id. (citation omitted).
Kuilan first argues that surveillance footage shown at trial was not strong enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was the shooter. In support of this contention, Kuilan asserts that the shooter's face and body were covered for most of the incident, as the only time the shooter's face is seen in the footage is when he removes his mask to place the gun inside the wheel well of a car. According to Kuilan, this "grainy" footage was not conclusive enough to establish his identity as the shooter.
Kuilan's first argument fails for two reasons. First, as Kuilan concedes in his argument, the surveillance footage showed that the shooter removed his mask after the shooting when he was hiding the gun. Upon viewing this footage, Corporal Johnson of the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) was able to identify Kuilan as the shooter in the video because Corporal Johnson had been investigating and saw Kuilan...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting