Case Law Coning v. Bayer Pharma AG (In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II))

Coning v. Bayer Pharma AG (In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II))

Document Cited Authorities (6) Cited in (47) Related (2)
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of California – 2021
In re Incretin-Based Therapies Prods. Liab. Litig.
"...F. Supp. 2d at 1172 (citing In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litig. , 292 F.3d at 1133 ); In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Prod. Liab. Litig. (No. II) , 982 F.3d 113, 124 (2d Cir. 2020) (approving of the district court's "holding that there is a general causation requirement across ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2022
Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage Corporation
"...the jury." In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Prod. Liab. Litig. (No. II) , 341 F. Supp. 3d 213, 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2018), aff'd , 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020). "[T]he proponent of expert testimony has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the admissibility requi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida – 2022
In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig.
"...acceptance, let alone general acceptance, in the scientific community" it is an indication of an unreliable methodology), aff'd, 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020). To be sure, a court's focus under Daubert is on methodologies—not conclusions. Daubert, 509 U.S. at 595, 113 S.Ct. 2786. But for all ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2022
Focus Prods. Grp. Int'l v. Kartri Sales Co.
"...(No. II), 341 F. Supp. 3d 213, 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Tin Yat Chin, 371 F.3d 31, 40 (2d Cir. 2004)), aff'd, 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020). These words must "be read in light of the liberalizing purpose of Rule 702. United States v. Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 400 (2d Cir. 1985..."
Document | Maryland Court of Appeals – 2023
Katz, Abosch, Windesheim, Gershman & Freedman, P.A. v. Parkway Neuroscience & Spine Inst., LLC
"...472 (4th Cir. 2015) ; 10 Elcock v. Kmart Corp. , 233 F.3d 734, 755-56 (3d Cir. 2000) ; 11 In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liab. Litig. (No. II) , 982 F.3d 113, 123 (2d Cir. 2020). 12 Consider as one example Rink v. Cheminova, Inc. , an Eleventh Circuit case in which the app..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
2 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2021
New York Medical and Life Sciences: Year in Review 2020
"...and legal credentials to protect your critical life sciences products. Judi Abbott Curry In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II), 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020) In an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2023
Zantac MDL Decision Reinforces Principle That Lack Of General Acceptance Of An Expert's Conclusions Raises A Red Flag
"...court may fairly suspect that the principles and methods have not been faithfully applied.' See also Coning v. Bayer Pharma AG et al., 982 F. 3d 113, 124 (2d Cir 2020) ('the court was well within its discretion to consider whether plaintiffs' experts' conclusions were generally accepted by ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of California – 2021
In re Incretin-Based Therapies Prods. Liab. Litig.
"...F. Supp. 2d at 1172 (citing In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litig. , 292 F.3d at 1133 ); In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Prod. Liab. Litig. (No. II) , 982 F.3d 113, 124 (2d Cir. 2020) (approving of the district court's "holding that there is a general causation requirement across ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2022
Capri Sun GmbH v. American Beverage Corporation
"...the jury." In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Prod. Liab. Litig. (No. II) , 341 F. Supp. 3d 213, 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2018), aff'd , 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020). "[T]he proponent of expert testimony has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the admissibility requi..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida – 2022
In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig.
"...acceptance, let alone general acceptance, in the scientific community" it is an indication of an unreliable methodology), aff'd, 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020). To be sure, a court's focus under Daubert is on methodologies—not conclusions. Daubert, 509 U.S. at 595, 113 S.Ct. 2786. But for all ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2022
Focus Prods. Grp. Int'l v. Kartri Sales Co.
"...(No. II), 341 F. Supp. 3d 213, 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting United States v. Tin Yat Chin, 371 F.3d 31, 40 (2d Cir. 2004)), aff'd, 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020). These words must "be read in light of the liberalizing purpose of Rule 702. United States v. Brown, 776 F.2d 397, 400 (2d Cir. 1985..."
Document | Maryland Court of Appeals – 2023
Katz, Abosch, Windesheim, Gershman & Freedman, P.A. v. Parkway Neuroscience & Spine Inst., LLC
"...472 (4th Cir. 2015) ; 10 Elcock v. Kmart Corp. , 233 F.3d 734, 755-56 (3d Cir. 2000) ; 11 In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liab. Litig. (No. II) , 982 F.3d 113, 123 (2d Cir. 2020). 12 Consider as one example Rink v. Cheminova, Inc. , an Eleventh Circuit case in which the app..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2021
New York Medical and Life Sciences: Year in Review 2020
"...and legal credentials to protect your critical life sciences products. Judi Abbott Curry In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II), 982 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2020) In an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of..."
Document | Mondaq United States – 2023
Zantac MDL Decision Reinforces Principle That Lack Of General Acceptance Of An Expert's Conclusions Raises A Red Flag
"...court may fairly suspect that the principles and methods have not been faithfully applied.' See also Coning v. Bayer Pharma AG et al., 982 F. 3d 113, 124 (2d Cir 2020) ('the court was well within its discretion to consider whether plaintiffs' experts' conclusions were generally accepted by ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial