Sign Up for Vincent AI
Croft v. State
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, BY: HUNTER N. AIKENS
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BY: JOE HEMLEBEN
BEFORE RANDOLPH, C.J., MAXWELL AND BEAM, JJ.
¶1. Montrell Croft, a/k/a "G-Money," was convicted of "participating in or conducting or conspiring" in illegal gang activity, possession of a firearm by a felon, and attempted murder in Lauderdale County Circuit Court following a jury trial. Croft now appeals. The Court finds that an instruction permitting a jury in a criminal case to find an element of a crime by a preponderance of the evidence constitutes plain error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial on whether Croft "participat[ed] in or conduct[ed] or conspir[ed]" in criminal gang activity beyond a reasonable doubt. Croft's felon-in-possession and attempted-murder convictions and sentences are affirmed.
¶2. On September 23, 2015, Marcus Hall, a/k/a "Handy Dandy," was approached by a group of men including Croft, who witnesses testified was a ranking member of the "Rolling 60s Crips" gang. Croft told Hall, "you know you're fixing to die tonight; right?" Hall replied that he did not have a problem with the men. Another group including Kenzavion Woodard ("Kenza") approached Hall from a different direction. Kenza screamed Hall's name, then Croft shot Hall. Hall fell in a ditch as men in the groups continued to shoot at him. After firing multiple shots, the groups fled.
¶3. Hall received wounds to the abdomen and each thigh. A treating physician testified that any of the three wounds could have been fatal. Anthony Ball, a gang investigator with the Meridian Police Department, visited Hall in the hospital. Hall told Ball that "G-Money" was one of the shooters. Ball knew "G-Money" to be Croft. After Hall was released from the hospital, Ball had Hall look at group photos from the Rolling 60s Crips' Facebook page. Hall identified Croft as "G-Money" and identified three other assailants from the photos.
¶4. A grand jury returned a multicount, multidefendant indictment charging Croft and others with crimes related to the shooting of Hall. Count I charged Croft, Jimmy Marquez Johnson ("Johnson"), Emmitt Jordan, Ernest Scott, and Kenza with participating in, conducting, or conspiring in illegal gang activity under Mississippi Code Sections 97-1-1 and 97-44-19 (Rev. 2014). Count II charged Croft with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under Mississippi Code Section 97-37-5 (Rev. 2014). Count III charged Croft, Kenza, and Johnson with attempted murder under Mississippi Code Sections 97-1-7 and 97-3-19 (Rev. 2014).
¶5. Croft pleaded not guilty. His trial was set to proceed with Kenza and Johnson as codefendants. Croft petitioned for appointment of counsel, which was granted. Croft then filed a pro se motion for release on bond. Croft's court-appointed attorney, Marcus Evans, then filed a motion for discovery. Croft's trial was reset three times over the course of months for various reasons, including substitution of counsel after Croft sought Evans's dismissal. Croft's second court-appointed attorney, Stephen Wilson, filed a motion to set bail. The trial court denied the motion because Croft was already on bond for a drug-trafficking charge in Alabama.
¶6. Croft subsequently filed a demand for speedy trial. Croft then filed his responses to discovery along with a notice of alibi defense.1 Croft's trial was reset after the withdrawal of cocounsel for Croft's codefendants, Kenza and Johnson. Croft filed a motion to dismiss the indictment for violation of his right to a speedy trial and, alternatively, a motion to sever his trial from those of his codefendants. The trial court denied Croft's motion to dismiss but severed Croft's trial.
¶7. The day before trial, Kenza accepted a plea deal and agreed to testify. Croft objected to Kenza's testifying, claiming unfair surprise. The trial court permitted Croft and the State to meet with Kenza and to obtain his statement prior to his testifying. After Croft obtained Kenza's statement, Croft claimed he needed to alter his trial strategy and call Ernest Scott and Emmitt Jordan, who previously had been disclosed as witnesses for Croft. Both witnesses were present in the courtroom awaiting Croft's trial. The trial court granted Croft's request to issue subpoenas for both but declined to grant a continuance. Croft failed to have either witness served with a subpoena, and he did not call Scott and Jordan or his alleged alibi witness.
¶8. The State offered four witnesses: the victim, Hall; Ball, an investigator from the Meridian Police Department; Kenza, one of Hall's assailants; and the emergency room physician who treated Hall. Hall testified to the facts discussed above, and he also provided an in-court identification of Croft.
¶9. Ball questioned about his investigation. Ball had been employed in law enforcement for twenty-two years and was assigned to the Meridian Police Department's Gang Unit. In addition to his on-the-job training and experience, he testified that he had specialized training in gang-related cases from the Mississippi Association of Gang Investigators ("MAGI"). Ball testified that he attends a MAGI conference each year to obtain recertification as a gang investigator. He testified that he knew Croft and provided an in-court identification of him.
¶10. Ball testified that the victim, Hall, was a "hang-around" with the Black Disciple gang, meaning he was friends with Black Disciples but was not an actual member. When the State questioned Ball about whether the Black Disciples and the Rolling 60s Crips were rivals, he testified that The State then questioned Ball about his personal knowledge of whether Croft was affiliated with any particular gang. Ball testified that he had known Croft for six or seven years and that it was common for him to keep up with who was associated with what gang. Ball stated, "I have talked to Montrell Croft on several occasions, and he is firm—believe me, he will tell you he's a 60 Crip."
¶11. The State asked Ball his opinion on what had prompted the shooting. The following colloquy took place:
¶12. Kenza was called to testify on the second day of trial. Kenza's testimony was consistent with Hall's testimony about what occurred before and during the shooting. Kenza testified that the shooting began after he, Croft, and others observed Hall wearing orange, a color associated with the "Hoover Crips" gang. Kenza testified that they believed Hall was trying to sneak up on them because the Hoover Crips and the Rolling 60s Crips were "beefing" with each other. Kenza later testified that he had also tried to shoot Hall because Hall was a Black Disciple but that his gun would not fire. Kenza testified that he tried to shoot Hall because he wanted to "try to get some stripes off [of Hall]," which would have entitled him to a higher ranking in his gang.
¶13. Following the doctor's testimony, the State rested. Croft moved for a directed verdict and judgment as a matter of law on Counts I and III. The trial court denied Croft's motion.
¶14. A total of twenty-one jury instructions were given. The trial court gave the following jury instruction detailing the elements of the crime of participating in or conducting criminal gang activity:
¶15. To define "gang," the...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting