Case Law A.D. v. Dep't of Children & Families

A.D. v. Dep't of Children & Families

Document Cited Authorities (2) Cited in Related

Thomas J. Butler, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for the Department of Children and Families; Thomasina F. Moore and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, for the Guardian ad Litem Program, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the final judgment terminating appellant's parental rights, we conclude that the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, that the judgment was in the children's manifest best interests, and that the termination of parental rights was the least restrictive means of protecting the child from harm. See S.M. v. Fla. Dep't. of Children & Families, 202 So. 3d 769 (Fla. 2016) ; Guardian ad Litem Program v. K.H., 276 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ; K.D. v. Dep't of Children & Families, 242 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

Affirmed.

1 cases
Document | Florida District Court of Appeals – 2019
St. Brendan High Sch., Inc. v. Neff
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
Document | Florida District Court of Appeals – 2019
St. Brendan High Sch., Inc. v. Neff
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex