Case Law Daniel v. American Bd. of Emergency Medicine

Daniel v. American Bd. of Emergency Medicine

Document Cited Authorities (86) Cited in (344) Related (1)

Jeremy R. Kasha, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, New York (Colin A. Underwood, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York New York; Ralph L. Halpern, Mitchell J. Banas, Jr., Jaeckle Fleischmann & Mugel LLP, Buffalo, New York, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellant Gregory F. Daniel, M.D., on behalf of himself and others similarly situated.

Jeffrey D. Ubersax, Jones Day, Cleveland, Ohio (Robert H. Rawson, Jr., Elizabeth A. Grove, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee American Board of Emergency Medicine.

Jonathan A. Damon, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP, New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, Loma Linda Medical Center and St. Anthony Hospital-Central.

Robert E. Glanville, Phillips Lytle, LLP, Buffalo, New York, for Defendant-Appellee Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors.

Douglass G. Hewitt, Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Defendant-Appellee Methodist Hospital of Indiana.

Samuel W. Silver, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Defendant-Appellee Mercy Catholic Medical Center-Misericordia Division.

Nancy G. Lischer, Hinshaw & Culbertson, Chicago, Illinois, for Defendant-Appellee St. Francis Hospital & Medical Center.

Denise M. Gunter, Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Defendant-Appellee Forsyth Memorial Hospital.

Before: McLAUGHLIN, KATZMANN, and RAGGI, Circuit Judges.

RAGGI, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs-appellants are licensed physicians who practice or had practiced emergency medicine throughout the United States although they did not complete formal residency training programs in that specialty. They allege that the defendants, the American Board of Emergency Medicine ("ABEM"), the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors ("CORD"), twenty-eight named hospitals, and various individuals now or previously associated with these institutions and organizations, colluded to restrain trade in connection with the practice of emergency medicine in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, see 15 U.S.C. § 1, and to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the market for ABEM-certified and -eligible doctors in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, see id. § 2. Plaintiffs specifically complain that the defendants manipulated the residency training requirement for ABEM certification to limit the number of doctors certified in emergency medicine in order to guarantee super-competitive compensation for such doctors and to deny certification and its attendant compensation benefits to members of the plaintiff class.

Plaintiffs now appeal a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Richard J. Arcara, Judge; Leslie G. Foschio, Magistrate Judge), entered on June 20, 2003, dismissing their Second Amended Complaint for lack of antitrust standing. See Daniel v. American Bd. of Emergency Med., 269 F.Supp.2d 159 (W.D.N.Y.2003). Defendants insist that the case was properly dismissed not only for lack of antitrust standing but also for lack of personal jurisdiction and venue in the Western District of New York. We agree with the defendants that the lack of personal jurisdiction and venue supports dismissal. While such a conclusion might permit us to order transfer of this case to a district where personal jurisdiction and venue properly obtain, we conclude that such a transfer is not in the interests of justice in this case because the plaintiffs lack antitrust standing to pursue their claims....

5 cases
Document | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey – 2020
In re Blount
"... ... Colasuonno , 697 F.3d 164, 173 (2d Cir. 2012) (citing Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 423 (2d Cir. 2005) (citations ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2015
United Tactical Sys. LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.
"... ... most firmly established principles of personal jurisdiction in American tradition") 5 ; Martinez, 764 F.3d at 1067. The second variable is that ... Garcia, 2011 WL 2532478, at *6 (N.D.Cal. June 24, 2011) (citing Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 432 (2d Cir.2005) ). The ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York – 2021
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
"... ... 's In an April 2016 email listing updates on PICC opportunities, Daniel Tighe, a Bard District Manager, wrote: "St. Vincent – Billings – Angio ... Am. Bd. of Emergency Med. , 428 F.3d 408, 442-43 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that plaintiffs ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2021
Kim v. Lee
"... ... based on Section 1391(b)(2), "a two-part inquiry is appropriate." Daniel v. American Bd. of Emergency Medicine , 428 F.3d 408, 432 (2d Cir. 2005) ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit – 2022
Yale New Haven Hosp. v. Becerra
"... ... Charrow, General Counsel, Daniel J. Barry, Acting General Counsel, Janice L. Hoffman, Associate General ... ; see also Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med. , 428 F.3d 408, 423 (2d Cir. 2005) ("Only if we discern ambiguity" ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Fourth Edition – 2010
Table of Cases
"...(W.D.NLY. 1997), 111 Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 235 F. Supp. 2d 194 (W.D. N.Y. 2002), 101 Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005), 148, 121, 122 Davies v. Genesis Med. Ctr., 994 F. Supp. 1078 (S.D. Iowa 1998), 125 Davric Maine Corp. v. Rancourt, 216 F.3d 1..."
Document | Part I – 2017
Statute of Limitations
"...the continuing conspiracy exception applied to defendant’s decision to boycott plaintiff’s business); Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 435 (2d Cir. 2005) (stating that a “compelling reason for transfer is generally acknowledged when a plaintiff’s case, if dismissed, would ..."
Document | State Action Practice Manual. Third Edition – 2017
Pleadings and Procedural Issues
"...Hoen, 407 F. Supp. 2d 1234, 1238 (W.D. Wash. 2005); Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 235 F. Supp. 2d 194, 206 (W.D.N.Y. 2002), aff’d , 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005); Paladin Assocs. v. Mont. Power Co., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1013, 1026 (D. Mont. 2000). 16. See, e.g. , Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co...."
Document | Part III – 2017
Table of Cases
"...U.S. 345 (1983), 80 D Daisy Mt. Fire Dist. v. Microsoft Corp., 547 F. Supp. 2d 475 (D. Md. 2008), 80 Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005), 21, 57, 60, 65 Danvers Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 543 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2008), 312 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,..."
Document | DOJ Civil Antitrust Practice and Procedure Manual. First edition – 2012
Table of Cases
"...Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 244 F.3d 144 (D.C. Cir. 2001), 167 D. Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005), 187, 188 In re Delta/AirTran Baggage Fee Antitrust Litig., 770 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ga. 2011), 58 Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc., ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2013
Clearance: Proskauer's Quarterly Antitrust Update - Fall 2013
"...Aug. 2, 2013) at 14-16, citing GTE New Media Servs., Inc. v. BellSouth Corp., 199 F.3d 1343 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 424 (2d Cir. 2005). See also Herbert Hovenkamp, "Personal Jurisdiction & Venue in Private Antitrust Actions in the Federal Cou..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Antitrust Health Care Handbook, Fourth Edition – 2010
Table of Cases
"...(W.D.NLY. 1997), 111 Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 235 F. Supp. 2d 194 (W.D. N.Y. 2002), 101 Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005), 148, 121, 122 Davies v. Genesis Med. Ctr., 994 F. Supp. 1078 (S.D. Iowa 1998), 125 Davric Maine Corp. v. Rancourt, 216 F.3d 1..."
Document | Part I – 2017
Statute of Limitations
"...the continuing conspiracy exception applied to defendant’s decision to boycott plaintiff’s business); Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 435 (2d Cir. 2005) (stating that a “compelling reason for transfer is generally acknowledged when a plaintiff’s case, if dismissed, would ..."
Document | State Action Practice Manual. Third Edition – 2017
Pleadings and Procedural Issues
"...Hoen, 407 F. Supp. 2d 1234, 1238 (W.D. Wash. 2005); Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 235 F. Supp. 2d 194, 206 (W.D.N.Y. 2002), aff’d , 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005); Paladin Assocs. v. Mont. Power Co., 97 F. Supp. 2d 1013, 1026 (D. Mont. 2000). 16. See, e.g. , Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co...."
Document | Part III – 2017
Table of Cases
"...U.S. 345 (1983), 80 D Daisy Mt. Fire Dist. v. Microsoft Corp., 547 F. Supp. 2d 475 (D. Md. 2008), 80 Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005), 21, 57, 60, 65 Danvers Motor Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 543 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 2008), 312 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,..."
Document | DOJ Civil Antitrust Practice and Procedure Manual. First edition – 2012
Table of Cases
"...Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Nat’l Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 244 F.3d 144 (D.C. Cir. 2001), 167 D. Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408 (2d Cir. 2005), 187, 188 In re Delta/AirTran Baggage Fee Antitrust Litig., 770 F. Supp. 2d 1299 (N.D. Ga. 2011), 58 Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc., ..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey – 2020
In re Blount
"... ... Colasuonno , 697 F.3d 164, 173 (2d Cir. 2012) (citing Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 423 (2d Cir. 2005) (citations ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of California – 2015
United Tactical Sys. LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.
"... ... most firmly established principles of personal jurisdiction in American tradition") 5 ; Martinez, 764 F.3d at 1067. The second variable is that ... Garcia, 2011 WL 2532478, at *6 (N.D.Cal. June 24, 2011) (citing Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 432 (2d Cir.2005) ). The ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York – 2021
AngioDynamics, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
"... ... 's In an April 2016 email listing updates on PICC opportunities, Daniel Tighe, a Bard District Manager, wrote: "St. Vincent – Billings – Angio ... Am. Bd. of Emergency Med. , 428 F.3d 408, 442-43 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that plaintiffs ... "
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York – 2021
Kim v. Lee
"... ... based on Section 1391(b)(2), "a two-part inquiry is appropriate." Daniel v. American Bd. of Emergency Medicine , 428 F.3d 408, 432 (2d Cir. 2005) ... "
Document | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit – 2022
Yale New Haven Hosp. v. Becerra
"... ... Charrow, General Counsel, Daniel J. Barry, Acting General Counsel, Janice L. Hoffman, Associate General ... ; see also Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med. , 428 F.3d 408, 423 (2d Cir. 2005) ("Only if we discern ambiguity" ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2013
Clearance: Proskauer's Quarterly Antitrust Update - Fall 2013
"...Aug. 2, 2013) at 14-16, citing GTE New Media Servs., Inc. v. BellSouth Corp., 199 F.3d 1343 (D.C. Cir. 2000); Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 424 (2d Cir. 2005). See also Herbert Hovenkamp, "Personal Jurisdiction & Venue in Private Antitrust Actions in the Federal Cou..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial