Books and Journals DMV proceedings

DMV proceedings

Document Cited Authorities (280) Cited in Related
DMV PROCEEDINGS
11-1
CHAPTER 11
DMV PROCEEDINGS
§11:10 THE ADMINISTRATIVE PER SE (APS) SUSPENSION ACTION
§11:11 Grounds for Issuance of an APS Order
§11:11.1 Diversion on Criminal Charge Does Not Preclude APS Action
§11:11.2 Use of Arrest Records by DMV Where Records Have Been Ordered Sealed
§11:12 APS Suspension Periods
Figure 11-1 APS Suspension Period Chart (offenses January 1, 2019 or later)
Figure 11-2 APS Suspension Period Chart (offenses July 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018)
§11:12.1 Concurrent vs. Consecutive Suspension Orders
§11:13 Restricted License Eligibility on APS Suspension
§11:13.1 First-Time Offender Over 21 With Excessive BAC
§11:13.2 Multiple Offenders with Excessive BAC
§11:13.3 Commercial License Holders And Commercial Vehicles
§11:13.4 Critical Need to Drive for Persons Under 21
§11:13.5 Grounds for Denial or Termination of Restricted License
§11:15 Record Must Be Updated in Sacramento DMV for Reinstatement
§11:20 PROCEDURE PRIOR TO ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
§11:21 Service of APS Order
§11:21.1 Prominent Notice of Right to Hearing
§11:21.2 Foreign Language Notice
§11:22 Seizure (“Snatching”) of California License and Issuance of Temporary License
§11:23 Manner of Service
§11:24 Service of the Wrong Order
§11:25 Sworn Statement and Supporting Information Forwarded to DMV by Off‌icer
§11:26 Blood and Urine Samples Sent to Forensic Lab; Lab Sends Results to DMV
§11:27 Automatic Internal Review by DMV and Factual Determination by DMV
§11:30 REQUESTING THE HEARING
§11:31 How to Request a Hearing
§11:32 Contents of the Hearing Request
§11:33 The 10-Day Deadline (the Law and Reality)
§11:33.1 Exceptions to the DMV’s 10-Day Deadline
§11:34 Telephone vs. In-Person Hearing Request
§11:35 Hearing Location
§11:36 Motion for Change of Venue
§11:37 Notice of Hearing
DMV PROCEEDINGS
California Drunk Driving Law 11-2
§11:40 THE RENEWED RIGHT TO A HEARING (OR SECOND HEARING)
§11:41 New Hearing as of Right
§11:41.1 Obtaining the Renewed Hearing
§11:42 New Hearing by Discretion
§11:50 PREPARING FOR THE HEARING
§11:51 Discovery
§11:52 No Right to Pitchess Discovery at DMV
§11:53 Request for Discovery
§11:54 Non-Compliance With Discovery Demand
§11:55 Subpoenaing Witnesses
§11:55.1 Manner of Service
§11:55.2 Fees for Government Employees
§11:55.3 Enforcing a Subpoena
§11:56 Testimony by Aff‌idavit or Declaration
§11:60 THE HEARING PROCEDURE
§11:61 Continuances and “Reconvenes”
§11:61.1 Denial of Continuances
§11:62 Reopening Hearing and Receipt of Evidence After Hearing
§11:63 Dual Role: Prosecutor and Decision-Maker
§11:64 Grounds for Disqualif‌ication of Hearing Off‌icer
§11:64.1 Voluntary Disqualif‌ication
§11:64.2 Challenge for Cause
§11:64.3 No Peremptory Challenge
§11:65 Hearing Off‌icer Need Not Be an Attorney
§11:66 Right to a Prompt Hearing and Decision; Stay Order
§11:66.1 Rejecting the Stay Order
§11:67 Limited Power of DMV Hearing Off‌icer
§11:70 RULES OF EVIDENCE
§11:71 The Applicable Rules of Evidence
§11:72 The Hearsay Rule
§11:73 Exception Might Permit Sole Use of Driver’s Hearsay Evidence
§11:74 Hearsay-in-Hearsay
§11:75 Hearsay Police Reports
§11:75.1 Hearsay Statement of Off‌icer in Another Off‌icer’s Report
§11:75.2 Hearsay Statement of Public Employee in Off‌icer’s Report
§11:75.3 Hearsay Statement of a Private Citizen in Off‌icer’s Hearsay Report
§11:76 [Reserved]
§11:77 [Reserved]
§11:78 Right to Continuance to Question Hearsay Declarant
§11:79 The Public Employee Records Exception
§11:79.1 The Statute—Evid. Code §1280
§11:79.2 Within the Scope of Duty of Public Employee
§11:79.3 Contemporaneous Recording Requirement
§11:79.4 Trustworthiness Requirement Is Presumptively Satisf‌ied
§11:79.5 “At or Near” Requirement Is Not Presumptively Satisf‌ied
§11:80 Off‌icial Notice
§11:81 Off‌icial Duty Presumption
§11:82 DMV’s Off‌icial Records
§11:83 Unsworn Statements
§11:84 Admissibility of Chemical Test Report
§11:84.1 Unsworn Chemical Test Report
DMV PROCEEDINGS
11-3 DMV Proceedings
§11:84.2 Non-Certif‌ied Chemical Test Report Received Electronically
or by Computer From Computerized Database
§11:85 Hearing Off‌icer’s Experience, Technical Competence and Specialized Knowledge
§11:86 Evidentiary Privileges
§11:87 Preservation of Evidence
§11:88 Authentication of Documents
§11:89 Corpus Delecti Rule
§11:90 Testimony by Aff‌idavit or Declaration
§11:91 Electronic Reports and Signatures
§11:92 Crime Lab Reports
§11:92.1 Crime Labs Don’t Need Licenses From DHS
§11:92.2 Crime Labs No Longer Subject to Inspections and Prof‌iciency Testing Minimized
§11:92.3 DHS No Longer Will Keep Lists of Persons Approved to Conduct Forensic
Alcohol Testing
§11:100 THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE
§11:101 Exclusionary Rule Inapplicable Absent Egregious Conduct By Police
§11:102 Unlawful Speed Trap Rule
§11:110 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
§11:120 EXCESSIVE BAC HEARING (.08% OR HIGHER)
§11:121 Summary of the Issues
§11:122 Analysis of the Issues
§11:122.1 ISSUE 1: Reasonable Cause to Believe Person in Violation of
VC §23152 or §23153
§11:122.2 ISSUE 2: The Person Was Arrested
§11:122.2.1 “Lawful” Arrest Required
§11:122.2.1(a) Off‌icer Must Have Objectively
Reasonable Suspicion of
Traff‌ic Violation
§11:122.2.1(b) May Arrest Be Found Lawful Where
Detention Is Not?
§11:122.2.2 What Constitutes an Arrest?
§11:122.2.3 Arrest That Becomes Detention Only
§11:122.2.4 DUI Checkpoints and Other Roadblock Detentions
§11:122.2.5 Speed Trap Arrest Is Not Legal
§11:122.2.6 Non-Presence Misdemeanor Arrest and the
§40300.5 Exception
§11:122.2.7 Off‌icer Must Have State-Issued P.O.S.T. Certif‌icate
§11:122.2.8 Military and Federal Police
§11:122.2.9 California Police Off‌icer Outside His Employing Jurisdiction
§11:122.3 ISSUE 3: Person Was Driving With a 0.08% or Higher BAC
§11:122.3.1 Driving
§11:122.3.2 “ Vehicle”
§11:122.3.3 Must Be Direct Evidence of BAC
§11:122.3.4 Scientif‌ic Foundation: Off‌icial Duty Presumption and
Rebutting It
§11:122.3.5 The Three -Hour Presumption In VC §23152 Applies
§11:122.3.5(a) Rebutting Three-Hour Presumption
With Rising BAC Defense
§11:122.3.5(b) Use Of General Intoxication
Evidence To Bolster Or Reject
Retrograde Opinion

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex