Sign Up for Vincent AI
Dye v. City of Bloomington
Jacob Alexander Catt, Michael Jay Bruzzese, Orzeske & Blackwell, P.C, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants.
James S. Stephenson, Pamela G. Schneeman, Stephenson Morow & Semler, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants/Counterclaimants.
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs Sarah Dye and Douglas Mackey operate Schooner Creek Farms and sell produce at the Bloomington, Indiana city-run farmers’ market. Non-parties to this litigation have accused Dye and Mackey of being Nazis and/or white supremacists. Protestors began appearing at the Bloomington Farmers’ Market to protest Plaintiffs’ presence at the Market and to encourage market patrons to boycott Schooner Creek. Tensions grew over the course of the summer of 2019, ultimately leading to the present suit against Defendants, the City of Bloomington; Mayor John Hamilton; Paula McDevitt, Administrator of the Bloomington Parks and Recreation Department; and Marcia Veldman, Program Coordinator for the Bloomington Farmers’ Market (collectively, the "Defendants" or the "City"). Plaintiffs believe Defendants violated their constitutional rights by failing to intervene and stop the protests, selectively enforcing Market rules regarding expressive conduct, and encouraging the boycott.
Now pending before the court are Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Oral Argument. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED . Plaintiffs’ motion for oral argument is DENIED as MOOT .
The facts relevant to this motion are as follows, and the court views those facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs as the non-moving party. Swetlik v. Crawford , 738 F.3d 818, 821 (7th Cir. 2013).
Vendors wishing to sell their products at the Bloomington Farmers’ Market were required to sign the Farm Vendor Contract. ). The Vendor Contract requires vendors to "collaborate with each other and the City, assist[ ] in creating a welcoming environment for all who attend the Market and ... represent themselves in a professional manner that reflects their commitment to the Market's mission and customer satisfaction." (Handbook at 19).
The Market established a designated location known as "Information Alley" for those wishing to distribute information. (Id. at 17). The 2019 Informational Table Policy governed Information Alley and those interested in setting up a table to distribute information. (Paula McDevitt Decl., Ex. B, Information Table Policy). In order to obtain a space in Information Alley, applicants were required to pay a one-time $10 registration fee. (Id. at 1). If anyone set up a booth or distributed information outside the Market area, they were not subject to the Information Table Policy. (McDevitt Decl. ¶ 8).
Sometime around May 2019, non-parties to this litigation discovered Dye's membership in Identity Evropa and the American Identity Movement, and Dye and Mackey were "doxed"1 on June 1, 2019. . Shortly thereafter, Bloomington community members formed No Space for Hate to oppose white supremacy and Schooner Creek's presence at the Market. (Filing No. 60-8, Dep. of John Hamilton ("Hamilton Dep.") at 44-45).
The first protestors showed up at the Market on June 8, 2019. (Filing No. 60-3, Dep. of Douglas Mackey ("Mackey Dep.") at 17). A "handful of people" stood in front of Schooner Creek's booth, told other Market patrons not to buy from Schooner Creek, called Mackey a Nazi, and generally harassed him. (Id. at 20). Marcia Veldman approached a Bloomington Police Department ("BPD") officer to ask for his assistance in stopping one of the protestors from handing out flyers. (Filing No. 60-5, Dep. of Marcia Veldman ("Veldman Dep.") at 55). The officer responded that he was there to protect people and property, not to enforce market rules. (Id. ). Veldman spoke to the protestor for 45 minutes and attempted to get him to relocate to Information Alley but was unsuccessful and believed she had no further recourse. (Id. at 80). Protestors returned to the Market on June 15, 2019, to flyer and encourage the boycott of Schooner Creek. (McDevitt Decl. ¶ 11). Market staff did not stop the protestors because they believed the First Amendment protected the protestors’ activity. (Id. ). Protestors appeared at Market every day that the Market was open for the remainder of 2019. (Dye Dep. at 299).
On June 17, 2019, the City received a petition signed by more than 200 individuals and co-signed by seven local organizations seeking Schooner Creek's expulsion from the Market. . Shortly thereafter, on June 20, 2019, Mayor Hamilton issued the following statement, which the court sets out in full:
.
Schooner Creek did not attend the Market on June 22, 2019, but protestors carrying signs encouraging the boycott stood in Schooner Creek's empty vending space and spoke with Market patrons. (McDevitt Decl. ¶ 12). Market staff again felt that the First Amendment prevented them from taking any action, so they did not confront the protestors. (Id. ). At this point, the Bloomington Parks Department determined that it was necessary to secure police assistance with the Market situation, so by June 24, 2019, BPD agreed to assist Market staff in enforcing the Market rules and to arrest violators for criminal trespass and disorderly conduct. (Id. ¶¶ 13–14).
On June 27, 2019, the Parks Department published a document titled, "Clarification of Long-standing...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting