Sign Up for Vincent AI
Ehart v. Lahaina Divers, Inc.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. 1:21-cv-00475-SOM-KJM
Ralph J. O'Neill (argued), Jamie C.S. Madriaga, and Matthew A. Hemme, MacDonald Rudy O'Neill & Yamauchi LLP, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Defendants-Appellants.
John R. Hillsman (argued), McGuinn Hillsman & Palefsky, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Mark M. Williams, Law Office of Mark M. Williams, Pasadena, California, for Amicus Curiae Daniel W. Bader, dba Sea Landing Dive Center.
Brian O. Felder, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Amicus Curiae Marine Recreation Association.
Charles D. Naylor, Law Offices of Charles D. Naylor, Long Beach, California; Michael F. Sturley, University of Texas Law School, Austin, Texas; Michael A. Kelly, Richard H. Schoenberger, Matthew D. Davis, Spencer J. Pahlke, and Joseph
Nicholson, Walkup Melodia Kelly & Schoenberger PC, San Francisco, California; Gretchen M. Nelson and Carlos F. Llinas Negret, Nelson & Fraenkel LLP, Los Angeles, California; Douglas T. Moore, The Law Offices of Douglas Thomas Moore LLC, Honolulu, Hawaii; Preston Easley, Law Offices of Preston Easley APC, San Pedro, California; Joseph S. Stacey, James P. Jacobsen, and Nigel T. Stacey, Stacey & Jacobsen LLP, Seattle, Washington; Lyle C. Cavin, Jr., Law Offices of Lyle C. Cavin, Jr. & Associates, Oakland, California; Daniel C. Dziuba, Tichenor Dziuba Law Office, Portland, Oregon; Kurt Micklow and Edward M. Bull, III, Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP, Oakland, California; Joel Krissman, Krissman & Silver LLP, Long Beach, California; for Amici Curiae Injured Vessel Passengers and Surviving Family Members and Personal Representatives of Fatally Injured Vessel Passengers.
Before: Carlos T. Bea, Daniel P. Collins, and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Bea;
OPINION
The question in this case is whether 46 U.S.C. § 30527(a),1 which prohibits certain liability waivers regarding "vessel[s] transporting passengers between ports in the United States, or between a port in the United States and a port in a foreign country," applies when a vessel transports passengers away from and back to a single port in the United States without stopping at any other port. We hold that it does not. The plain meaning of "between ports in the United States" is between at least two separate ports in the United States, and § 30527(a) therefore does not apply to liability waivers as to vessels that transport passengers away from and back to a single port without stopping at any other port.
On September 14, 2021, Maureen Anne Ehart and her husband, William McMein Ehart, Jr., went on a chartered scuba and snorkeling tour to Molokini Crater. Molokini Crater is a crescent-shaped volcanic atoll located about 2.5 miles off the south coast of Maui, Hawaii. The Eharts boarded the Dauntless—a boat owned by Lahaina Divers, Inc.—at Lahaina Harbor and traveled on the boat to Molokini Crater along with 14 other paying passengers and a three-person crew. The crew included the master of the Dauntless, Cory Dam, and two scuba instructors, Kaitlin Miller and Julianne Cricchio.
Prior to the excursion, the Eharts had each signed a separate waiver document, which stated: "THIS IS A RELEASE OF YOUR RIGHTS TO SUE LAHAINA DIVE & SURF, LLC, AND/OR LAHA[I]NA DIVERS INC. (LDS/LDI), AND ITS OWNERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND ASSIGNS FOR PERSONAL INJURIES OR WRONGFUL DEATH THAT MAY [OCCUR] DURING THE FORTHCOMING DIVE ACTIVITY AS A RESULT OF THE INHER[ENT ]RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SCUBA DIVING AND/OR SNORKE[LI]NG OR AS A RESULT OF NEGLIGENCE." The waiver then instructed participants to check boxes. Maureen Ehart checked the following boxes (William Ehart checked all of the boxes):
Below the questionnaire, the Eharts each again signed the waiver.3
The Dauntless traveled across the water from Lahaina Harbor to Molokini Crater, where it tied up to a mooring buoy. At Molokini Crater, the scuba instructors (Miller and Cricchio) escorted two groups of divers on separate scuba tours. Instead of joining the scuba tour members, Maureen Ehart and two other passengers snorkeled separately from the scuba tours in the waters of the Crater. Dam remained on the Dauntless to maintain an anchor watch, serve as a lookout, monitor the weather, supervise the passengers' snorkeling activities, and act as a lifeguard, among other duties.
The winds, waves, and currents inside the Crater increased, and the two other snorkelers who had gone with Maureen returned to the Dauntless, while Maureen stayed in the water. Dam, preoccupied by other duties, "lost track of [Maureen] and permitted her to drift away unsupervised and unseen." When Dam realized he had lost sight of Maureen, he did not recall the scuba tour members, call the Coast Guard, or conduct an immediate search; instead, he waited for both scuba tours to return to the boat and then ordered Miller and Cricchio to search for Maureen. This search, which lasted approximately 30 minutes, was "poorly planned, improperly equipped, and ultimately unsuccessful." Dam eventually called for assistance from the Coast Guard and local authorities. The Coast Guard and Maui County Emergency Services searched for Maureen for three days, but she was never found.
Plaintiff filed an action under admiralty jurisdiction in the District of Hawaii asserting six causes of action against Lahaina Divers and Dam ("Defendants")4: (1) a wrongful death claim based on gross negligence; (2) a wrongful death claim based on simple negligence; (3) a survival claim based on gross negligence; (4) a survival claim based on simple negligence; (5) a reckless infliction of emotional distress claim; and (6) a negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.
In their Answer to the Complaint, Defendants asserted waiver and release as an affirmative defense.5 Plaintiff moved to strike the defense, arguing that the liability waiver signed by the Eharts was void under 46 U.S.C. § 30527(a) and Hawaii Revised Statute ("HRS") § 663-1.54. Defendants opposed the motion on the grounds that (1) 46 U.S.C. § 30527(a) does not apply here because the Dauntless was not "transporting passengers between ports in the United States, or between a port in the United States and a port in a foreign country";...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting