Case Law Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Jean

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Jean

Document Cited Authorities (6) Cited in (4) Related

Storch Law, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Zvi A. Storch of counsel), for nonparty-appellant.

RAS Boriskin, LLC, Westbury, N.Y. (Joseph F. Battista and Leah Lenz of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JEFFREY A. COHEN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty E. 38 St. Realty, Inc., appeals from a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Noach Dear, J.), dated March 19, 2018. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, upon an order of the same court, also dated March 19, 2018, inter alia, granting the motion of OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC, the plaintiff's predecessor in interest, for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, and denying the cross motion of E. 38 St. Realty, Inc., for leave to intervene in the action and to dismiss the complaint, confirmed a referee's report and directed the sale of the subject property.

ORDERED that the judgment of foreclosure and sale is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On January 9, 2008, the defendants Phillippe Jean and Mary Jean (hereinafter together the Jeans) executed and delivered a note in the sum of $533,850 and mortgage securing the debt on real property located in Brooklyn. The Jeans entered into a loan modification agreement with the lender on January 20, 2010. The Jeans defaulted on their payment obligations by failing to make the May 1, 2011 payment, and subsequent monthly payments. OneWest Bank, FSB (hereinafter OneWest), the lender's assignee, commenced this action to foreclose the mortgage and filed a notice of pendency on or about September 20, 2012. The Jeans failed to interpose an answer. Mandatory settlement conferences were held on June 24, 2013, and September 18, 2013, and the matter was released from the settlement conference part on September 18, 2013. On or about February 10, 2014, the Jeans executed a deed to the subject property in favor of E. 38 St. Realty, Inc. (hereinafter E. 38 St. Realty). OneWest moved for leave to enter a default judgment and for an order of reference on or about January 16, 2015. By order dated June 17, 2016, OneWest's motion was granted, and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC (hereinafter OCWEN), OneWest's assignee, was substituted as the plaintiff. On November 25, 2016, the Referee issued a report of computation. OCWEN moved to confirm the Referee's report and for a judgment of foreclosure and sale on or about February 14, 2017. On August 31, 2017, the Jeans entered into a stipulation of settlement, inter alia, admitting their default on the note and mortgage and consenting to the entry of a judgment of foreclosure and sale. In November 2017, E. 38 St. Realty cross-moved for leave to intervene in the action and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) and on the ground that OneWest sued on the original note and mortgage instead of the loan modification agreement.

In an order dated March 19, 2018, the Supreme Court granted OCWEN's motion, denied E. 38 St. Realty's cross motion, and amended the complaint to substitute Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), OCWEN's assignee, as the plaintiff. A judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered upon the order. E. 38 St. Realty appeals.

" ‘Intervention under CPLR 1012 and 1013 requires a timely motion’ " ( U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tsimbalisty, 181 A.D.3d 749, 750, 117 N.Y.S.3d 862, quoting Castle Peak 2012–1 Loan Trust v. Sattar, 140 A.D.3d 1107, 1108, 35 N.Y.S.3d 368 ). "In...

4 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
People v. Jacaruso
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Empire Med. Servs. of Long Island, P.C. v. Sharma
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n v. N.Y.C. Envtl. Control Bd.
"...foreclosure and sale. Oh appeals.Intervention pursuant to CPLR 1012 or 1013 requires a timely motion (see Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v. Jean, 189 A.D.3d 1178, 1179, 134 N.Y.S.3d 220 ). "In considering whether a motion to intervene is timely, ‘courts do not engage in mere mechanical measureme..."
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2021
Bank of Am. v. N.Y.C. Envtl. Control Bd.
"... ... (see Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Jean, 189 A.D.3d ... 1178, 1179). "In ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
People v. Jacaruso
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2020
Empire Med. Servs. of Long Island, P.C. v. Sharma
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2021
Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n v. N.Y.C. Envtl. Control Bd.
"...foreclosure and sale. Oh appeals.Intervention pursuant to CPLR 1012 or 1013 requires a timely motion (see Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v. Jean, 189 A.D.3d 1178, 1179, 134 N.Y.S.3d 220 ). "In considering whether a motion to intervene is timely, ‘courts do not engage in mere mechanical measureme..."
Document | New York Supreme Court – 2021
Bank of Am. v. N.Y.C. Envtl. Control Bd.
"... ... (see Federal Natl. Mtge. Assn. v Jean, 189 A.D.3d ... 1178, 1179). "In ... "

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex