Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641

"...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15]     A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61..."

"...Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v. William Kelly & Sons Plumbing Contractors Ltd., 2005 ABQB..."

"...Although this is prohibited by section 78(3) of the LPA, the requirement has been breached by complainants before: Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 [ Feeney 2020] at paras 57–59, 68; Feeney v Alberta, 2022 ABCA 253 [ Feeney 2022] at para 4. In this regard, LSA seeks an Order of this Court (a) ..."

"...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001..."

"...30 at paras 47-48; Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 141 at para 7; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947 at para 23; Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at paras 12-13, aff’d 2022 ABCA [16]           I directed that if Ms Alston wished..."

"...These principles were summarized and explained in a complete manner by Rooke A.C.J. in Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641: [15]     A simple allegation of bias or misconduct is not a basis for judges to remove themselves from a matter: Bizon v Bizon, 2014 ABCA 174 at paras 61..."

"...Nation v. McMullen, 2020 ABQB 87, primarily at paras 12-25, appeal denied 2020 ABCA 366, primarily at paras 51-63; and Simon v. Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641, at paras 15-33 (appeal pending). See also Point on the Bow Development Ltd. v. William Kelly & Sons Plumbing Contractors Ltd., 2005 ABQB..."

"...Although this is prohibited by section 78(3) of the LPA, the requirement has been breached by complainants before: Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 [ Feeney 2020] at paras 57–59, 68; Feeney v Alberta, 2022 ABCA 253 [ Feeney 2022] at para 4. In this regard, LSA seeks an Order of this Court (a) ..."

"...in that Court of an Originating Application for ‘Judicial Review’ of an earlier decision by him dated October 22, 2020 at 2020 ABQB 641 dealing with QB13254 and QB06777. The applicant had already filed a Notice of Appeal from the October 22, 2020 decision on Court File No 2001..."

"...30 at paras 47-48; Rana v Rana, 2022 ABQB 141 at para 7; Feeney v TD General Insurance Company, 2021 ABQB 947 at para 23; Simon v Feeney, 2020 ABQB 641 at paras 12-13, aff’d 2022 ABCA [16]           I directed that if Ms Alston wished..."