Case Law Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll.

Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll.

Document Cited Authorities (32) Cited in (39) Related
OPINION

JUSTICE DOUGHERTY

In this discretionary appeal arising from the dismissal of personal injury claims on summary judgment, we consider whether the Superior Court erred in 1) finding a duty of care and 2) holding a pre-injury waiver signed by student athletes injured while playing football was not enforceable against claims of negligence, gross negligence, and recklessness. After careful review, we affirm the Superior Court's order only to the extent it reversed the trial court's entry of summary judgment on the claims of gross negligence and recklessness, and we remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I.

Appellees, Augustus Feleccia and Justin T. Resch, (collectively, appellees) were student athletes who played football at Lackawanna Junior College (Lackawanna), a non-profit junior college. See Complaint at ¶¶ 29, 30. At all times relevant to this matter, the following individuals were employed by Lackawanna and involved in its football program: (1) Kim A. Mecca, the Athletic Director for Lackawanna College who oversaw all of Lackawanna's athletic programs, including the football program (AD Mecca); (2) Mark D. Duda, the head coach (Coach Duda); (3) William E. Reiss, an assistant and linebacker coach (Coach Reiss); (4) Daniel A. Lamagna, an assistant and quarterback coach (Coach Lamagna); (5) Kaitlin M. Coyne, hired to be an athletic trainer (Coyne); and (6) Alexis D. Bonisese, hired to be an athletic trainer (Bonisese) (collectively with Lackawanna referred to as appellants). Id. at ¶¶31-34, 40, 41, 43, 44.

Lackawanna had customarily employed two athletic trainers to support the football program.1 However, both athletic trainers resigned in the summer of 2009 and AD Mecca advertised two job openings for the position of athletic trainer. AD Mecca received applications from Coyne and Bonisese, recent graduates of Marywood University who had obtained Bachelor of Science degrees in Athletic Training. AD Mecca conducted telephone interviews with Coyne and Bonisese for the open athletic trainer positions at Lackawanna. See Feleccia v. Lackawanna College , 156 A.3d 1200, 1203 (Pa. Super. 2017).

At the time she applied and interviewed for the Lackawanna position, Coyne had not yet passed the athletic trainer certification exam, which she took for the first time on July 25, 2009, and was therefore not licensed by the Board. Bonisese was also not licensed, having failed the exam on her first attempt, and still awaiting the results of her second attempt when she applied and interviewed for the Lackawanna position. Nevertheless, Lackawanna hired both Coyne and Bonisese in August 2009 with the expectation they would serve as athletic trainers, pending receipt of their exam results, and both women signed "athletic trainer" job descriptions. Id. After starting their employment at Lackawanna, Coyne and Bonisese both learned they did not pass the athletic trainer certification exam. Coyne informed AD Mecca of her test results, and AD Mecca also learned Bonisese had failed her second attempt at certification. Id. at 1203-04.

AD Mecca retitled the positions held by Coyne and Bonisese from "athletic trainers" to "first responders." Id. at 1204. AD Mecca notified Coyne and Bonisese via email and written correspondence that due to their failure to pass the certification exam, they would function as "first responders" instead of "athletic trainers." However, neither Coyne nor Bonisese executed new job descriptions, despite never achieving the credentials included in the athletic trainer job descriptions they did sign. Appellants were also aware the qualifications of their new hires was called into question by their college professors and clinic supervisors. See Id. More specifically, Shelby Yeager, a professor for Coyne and Bonisese during their undergraduate studies, communicated to AD Mecca her opinion that Coyne and Bonisese were impermissibly providing athletic training services in September 2009. Professor Yeager was aware Lackawanna did not have any full-time athletic trainers on staff2 and noted Coyne and Bonisese, as recent graduates, were inexperienced and did not have the required Board license. Professor Yeager stated that Coyne in particular was "ill-equipped to handle the rigors of a contact sport (like football) as an athletic trainer on her own regardless of whether she managed to pass [the certification] exam and obtain her state license." Id. , quoting Affidavit of Shelby Yeager. With regard to Bonisese, Bryan Laurie, who supervised her as a student, rated her performance as "below average/poor" and provided his assessment that she was not qualified to act as an athletic trainer in March of 2010. Id. , citing Affidavit of Bryan Laurie.

Appellee Resch started playing football at the age of six, and continued playing through high school. Id. at 1204-05. Upon graduating from high school in 2008, Resch was accepted at Lackawanna and, hoping to continue playing football, met with Coach Duda prior to arriving for classes. Resch tried out for the Lackawanna football team in the fall of 2008. Resch not only failed to make the roster, but was also placed on academic probation, so he was ineligible to play football in the spring of 2009.

Appellee Feleccia also began playing football as a child at the age of ten, and played through high school. Feleccia was recruited by Coach Duda to play football at Lackawanna. See id. Feleccia did not make the team in the fall of 2008, but practiced with them during that time. During a scrimmage in the fall of 2008, Feleccia tore the labrum in his left shoulder, which was surgically repaired. Feleccia was also placed on academic probation after the fall 2008 semester and temporarily withdrew from Lackawanna. See id.

In mid-January 2010, Resch and Feleccia returned to Lackawanna for the spring semester with the aspiration to make the football team. Id. Lackawanna required appellees to fill out and sign various documents in a "participation packet" before playing with the team, including a "Waiver of Liability and Hold Harmless Agreement" (the Waiver) and a form including an "Information/Emergency Release Consent" (the Consent). See Appellees' Brief in Opposition to MSJ at Exhibit 18(b). Appellee Resch "skimmed" and signed the Waiver on March 22, 2010. Feleccia , 156 A.3d at 1205. Feleccia also executed the Waiver on March 22, 2010. The Waiver provided as follows:

1. In consideration for my participation in _[Football]____________ (sport), I hereby release, waive, discharge and covenant not to sue Lackawanna College, its trustees, officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability, claims, demands, actions, and causes of action whatsoever arising out of or related to any loss, damage, or injury, including death, that may be sustained by me, or to any property belonging to me, while participating in such athletic activity.
2. To the best of my knowledge, I am not aware of any physical disability or health-related reasons or problems which would preclude or restrict my participation in this activity. I am fully aware of the risks and hazards connected with __[Football]___________ (sport), and I hereby elect to voluntarily participate in said activity, knowing that the activity may be hazardous to me and my property. I voluntarily assume full responsibility for any risks of loss, property damage, or personal injury, including death, that may be sustained by me, or any loss or damage to property owned by me, as a result of being engaged in such activity.
3. I have adequate health insurance necessary to provide for and pay any medical costs that may directly or indirectly result from my participation in this activity. I agree to indemnify and hold harmless Lackawanna College, its trustees, officers, agents, and employees, from any loss, liability, damage or costs, including court costs and attorneys' fees that may be incurred, due to my participation in said activity.
4. It is my express intent that this Release and Hold Harmless Agreement shall bind my family, if I am alive, and my heirs, assigns and personal representative, if I am deceased, and shall be deemed as a release, waiver, discharge and covenant not to sue Lackawanna College, its trustees, officers, agents and employees. I hereby further agree that this Waiver of Liability and Hold Harmless Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
In signing this release, I acknowledge and represent that I have read the foregoing Waiver of Liability and Hold Harmless Agreement, understand it and sign it voluntarily; no oral representations, statements, or inducements, apart from the foregoing written agreement, have been made; I am at least eighteen (18) years of age and fully competent; and I execute this Release for full, adequate and complete consideration fully intending to be bound by the same. Parent/Guardians' signature required for individuals under eighteen (18) years of age.

Waiver attached as Exhibit A to Appellants' Answer with New Matter.

Appellees also signed the Consent that provided, in pertinent part, as follows:

(1) I do hereby off[er] my voluntary consent to receive emergency medical services in the event of an injury during an athletic event provided by the athletic trainer, team physician or hospital staff.

Consent attached as part of Exhibit 18(b) to Appellees' Brief in Opposition to MSJ.

On March 29, 2010, appellees participated in the first day of spring contact football practice. The team engaged in a variation of the tackling drill known as the "Oklahoma Drill." Appellees had previously participated in the Oklahoma...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania – 2021
In re Rutter's Inc. Data Sec. Breach Litig.
"...of a reasonable man to protect them against an unreasonable risk of harm to them arising out of the act.’ " Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll. , 654 Pa. 324, 215 A.3d 3, 14 (2019) (quoting Dittman , 196 A.3d at 1046 ). And Chief Justice Saylor, in a partial concurrence and dissent in Dittman , ex..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania – 2020
Fragale v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
"...could be conceived as "creat[ing] a ‘special relationship’ with and an increased risk of harm to [Plaintiff]." Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll. , ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 3, 15 (2019). These significant distinctions make Dittman inapposite here. Plaintiff's reliance on Anderson is equally misplac..."
Document | Pennsylvania Supreme Court – 2020
Leight v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Physicians
"...516 A.2d 672, 678 (1986) (quoting Leong v. Takasaki , 55 Haw. 398, 520 P.2d 758, 764 (1974) ).10 See, e.g., Feleccia v. Lackawanna College , ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 3, 13–14 (2019) (examination of common law duties is not necessary in cases involving the application of existing statutory dut..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania – 2020
Humphries v. Pa. State Univ.
"...have this Court broaden the duty of care colleges owe to their student-athletes. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's discussion in Lackawanna College , however – which was decided just last year – is instructive to this Court's holding that Pennsylvania law does not recognize a special rela..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania – 2020
Canters Deli Las Vegas, LLC v. FreedomPay, Inc.
"...to dismiss the breach of contract claim.6 Plaintiffs’ reliance on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll., ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 3 (2019) is misplaced. In that case, the Court held that a pre-injury waiver, containing an exculpatory clause, signed by student..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania – 2021
In re Rutter's Inc. Data Sec. Breach Litig.
"...of a reasonable man to protect them against an unreasonable risk of harm to them arising out of the act.’ " Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll. , 654 Pa. 324, 215 A.3d 3, 14 (2019) (quoting Dittman , 196 A.3d at 1046 ). And Chief Justice Saylor, in a partial concurrence and dissent in Dittman , ex..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania – 2020
Fragale v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
"...could be conceived as "creat[ing] a ‘special relationship’ with and an increased risk of harm to [Plaintiff]." Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll. , ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 3, 15 (2019). These significant distinctions make Dittman inapposite here. Plaintiff's reliance on Anderson is equally misplac..."
Document | Pennsylvania Supreme Court – 2020
Leight v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Physicians
"...516 A.2d 672, 678 (1986) (quoting Leong v. Takasaki , 55 Haw. 398, 520 P.2d 758, 764 (1974) ).10 See, e.g., Feleccia v. Lackawanna College , ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 3, 13–14 (2019) (examination of common law duties is not necessary in cases involving the application of existing statutory dut..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of Pennsylvania – 2020
Humphries v. Pa. State Univ.
"...have this Court broaden the duty of care colleges owe to their student-athletes. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania's discussion in Lackawanna College , however – which was decided just last year – is instructive to this Court's holding that Pennsylvania law does not recognize a special rela..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania – 2020
Canters Deli Las Vegas, LLC v. FreedomPay, Inc.
"...to dismiss the breach of contract claim.6 Plaintiffs’ reliance on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll., ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 3 (2019) is misplaced. In that case, the Court held that a pre-injury waiver, containing an exculpatory clause, signed by student..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex