Richard Raysman is a Partner in our New York office.
Though the First Amendment affords greater free speech protections for government employees relative to those in the private sector, the speakers do not have carte blanche to insult or deride whomever they see fit. Rather, courts will balance the interest a governmental entity may have in regulating speech versus the constitutional rights of the speaker.
A recent case arose which presents the attempt of one court to balance these interests in the context of postings made on Facebook. In Shepherd v. McGee, No. 03:12-cv-02216-HZ, 2013 WL 5963076 (D. Or. Nov. 7, 2013), the plaintiff sued her former employer, the Oregon Department of Health Services ("DHS"), under a theory of First Amendment retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically...
