Fleming v. Zoning Bd. of App. of Oxford

230 N.E.3d 1061

103 Mass.App.Ct. 1128

Cite as 230 N.E.3d 1061 (Mass.App.Ct. 2024)

Memorandum and Order pursuant to Rule 1:28.

Casey FLEMING & others¹

v.ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF OXFORD & others.²

23-P-332

Appeals Court of Massachusetts.

Entered: March 21, 2024

Judgment affirmed.

1Kevin F. Carbonneau and Robert J. King. Fleming represents himself pro se on appeal. While he purports to appeal on behalf of all three owners, Fleming cannot represent others in court because he is not an attorney. See Wilbur v. Tunnell, 98 Mass. App. Ct. 19, 23 (2020). Because Carbonneau and King did not appeal the Land Court’s order as to them, it is not affected by this appeal.

2Peter LaFlash, David Silverman, Stephen Balcunas, Alfred St. Germain, and Thomas Purcell in their official capacity, as they are members of the Oxford zoning board of appeals.