Case Law Fortune v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Fortune v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Document Cited Authorities (20) Cited in (8) Related

Ahmuty, Demers & McManus, New York, NY (Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP [Timothy R. Capowski, Gerard S. Rath, John F. Watkins, and Joseph J. Beglane], of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant and third-party defendant-appellant.

Burns & Harris, New York, NY (Alison R. Keenan, Blake G. Goldfarb, Judith F. Stempler, and Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP [Brian J. Isaac ], of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, WILLIAM G. FORD, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kathy J. King, J.), entered September 1, 2020, and (2) an order of the same court dated November 12, 2020. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant third-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant in the principal sums of $2,000,000 for past pain and suffering, $1,000,000 for future pain and suffering, and $132,000 for future lost earnings. The order denied the separate motions of the defendant third-party plaintiff and the third-party defendant pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside the jury verdicts awarding damages for past and future pain and suffering as excessive, and to set aside the jury verdict awarding damages for future lost earnings as contrary to the weight of the evidence, and for a new trial or remittitur with respect to those damages.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the order is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new trial on the issue of damages for past pain and suffering, future pain and suffering, and future lost earnings, and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment thereafter, unless within 30 days after service upon the plaintiff of a copy of this decision and order, the plaintiff serves and files in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdicts as to damages for past pain and suffering from the principal sum of $2,000,000 to the principal sum of $1,300,000, for future pain and suffering from the principal sum of $1,000,000 to the principal sum of $700,000, and for future lost earnings from the principal sum of $132,000 to the principal sum of $99,000, and to the entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly; in the event that the plaintiff so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment.

The amount of damages to be awarded to a plaintiff for personal injuries is a question for the jury, and its determination will not be disturbed unless the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see id. § 5501[c]; Peterson v. MTA, 155 A.D.3d 795, 798, 64 N.Y.S.3d 266 ; Graves v. New York City Tr. Auth., 81 A.D.3d 589, 589, 916 N.Y.S.2d 793 ). "[T]he ‘reasonableness’ of compensation must be measured against the relevant precedent of comparable cases" ( Turuseta v. Wyassup–Laurel Glen Corp., 91 A.D.3d 632, 634, 937 N.Y.S.2d 240 ; see Donlon v. City of New York, 284 A.D.2d 13, 15, 727 N.Y.S.2d 94 ). Although prior damages awards in cases involving similar injuries are not binding upon the courts, they "guide and enlighten them in determining whether a verdict constitutes reasonable compensation" ( Taveras v. Vega, 119 A.D.3d 853, 854, 989 N.Y.S.2d 362 [internal quotation marks omitted]). "Consideration also is given to other factors, such as the nature and extent of the injuries" ( Arcos v. Bar–Zvi, 185 A.D.3d 882, 883, 126 N.Y.S.3d 743 ; see Nieva–Silvera v. Katz, 195 A.D.3d 1035, 1037, 146 N.Y.S.3d 799 ).

Here, the defendant/third-party plaintiff, New York City Housing Authority, and the third-party defendant, American Pipe & Tank Lining Co., Inc. (hereinafter together the appellants), correctly contend that the awards for past pain and suffering and future pain and suffering deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see CPLR 5501[c] ). The plaintiff's evidence at trial demonstrated that he suffered multiple fractures to his left hip when a coworker landed on him after falling approximately 20 feet from the top of a water tank that they were installing. The plaintiff's injuries required that he undergo surgery on his left hip, which in turn caused the plaintiff to develop nerve pain in his leg and a "foot drop" condition. One year later, and after having spent four months in a rehabilitation facility, the plaintiff underwent a total hip replacement, after which he was diagnosed with a limb length discrepancy. The plaintiff continues to experience pain in his leg for which he takes prescription medication, and is able to walk only short distances and must use crutches. Under the circumstances, and taking into account awards in similar cases (see Morales v. Davidson Apts., LLC, 193 A.D.3d 719, 141 N.Y.S.3d 879 ; Henry v. New York City Tr. Auth., 92 A.D.3d 460, 939 N.Y.S.2d 336 ), we find that the awards for past pain and suffering and future pain and suffering deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated herein.

The appellants correctly contend that the award for future lost earnings is contrary to the weight of the evidence. "Claims for lost earnings...

5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Blair v. Coleman
"...the award of damages for future pain and suffering was excessive to the extent indicated herein (see Fortune v. New York City Hous. Auth., 201 A.D.3d 705, 706–707, 161 N.Y.S.3d 283 ; Pimenta v. 1504 CIA, LLC, 197 A.D.3d at 672, 153 N.Y.S.3d 129 ; Lewis v. Vertex Constr. Corp., 170 A.D.3d at..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Bhim v. Platz
"...conduct was "not so pervasive or prejudicial as to have deprived [the plaintiffs] of a fair trial" ( Fortune v. New York City Hous. Auth., 201 A.D.3d 705, 708, 161 N.Y.S.3d 283 ). Furthermore, the Supreme Court effectively cured any prejudice to the plaintiffs that may have resulted from de..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Wynter v. Transdev Servs., Inc.
"...not be disturbed unless the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see Fortune v. New York City Hous. Auth., 201 A.D.3d 705, 706–707, 161 N.Y.S.3d 283 ; Peterson v. MTA, 155 A.D.3d 795, 798, 64 N.Y.S.3d 266 ; Graves v. New York City Tr. Auth., 81 A.D.3d 589, 5..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Butera v. Brookhaven Mem'l Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Abruzzi v. Bond Realty, Inc.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Blair v. Coleman
"...the award of damages for future pain and suffering was excessive to the extent indicated herein (see Fortune v. New York City Hous. Auth., 201 A.D.3d 705, 706–707, 161 N.Y.S.3d 283 ; Pimenta v. 1504 CIA, LLC, 197 A.D.3d at 672, 153 N.Y.S.3d 129 ; Lewis v. Vertex Constr. Corp., 170 A.D.3d at..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Bhim v. Platz
"...conduct was "not so pervasive or prejudicial as to have deprived [the plaintiffs] of a fair trial" ( Fortune v. New York City Hous. Auth., 201 A.D.3d 705, 708, 161 N.Y.S.3d 283 ). Furthermore, the Supreme Court effectively cured any prejudice to the plaintiffs that may have resulted from de..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Wynter v. Transdev Servs., Inc.
"...not be disturbed unless the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see Fortune v. New York City Hous. Auth., 201 A.D.3d 705, 706–707, 161 N.Y.S.3d 283 ; Peterson v. MTA, 155 A.D.3d 795, 798, 64 N.Y.S.3d 266 ; Graves v. New York City Tr. Auth., 81 A.D.3d 589, 5..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Butera v. Brookhaven Mem'l Hosp. Med. Ctr., Inc.
"..."
Document | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division – 2022
Abruzzi v. Bond Realty, Inc.
"..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex