Case Law Fowler v. Stitt

Fowler v. Stitt

Document Cited Authorities (70) Cited in Related

Christina S. Paek, Peter C. Renn, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, Karen Keith Wilkins, Tulsa, OK, Nicholas Arthur Guillory, Dallas, TX, Shelly Lynn Skeen, Lambda Legal, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs.

Audrey A. Weaver, Zachary Paul West, Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Oklahoma City, OK, Bryan Cleveland, Oklahoma State Department of Education, Oklahoma City, OK, Garry Michael Gaskins, II, Drummond Law Firm, Tulsa, OK, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. BROOMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs are two transgender men and one transgender woman born in Oklahoma who seek to alter their respective Oklahoma birth certificates to reflect their sex to be consistent with their current gender identity. Plaintiffs allege that the State of Oklahoma's refusal to issue revised birth certificates violates their federal constitutional rights under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Doc. 41.)1 Defendants move to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 24.) The motion is fully briefed and ready for review. (Docs. 33, 38.) For the reasons explained below, Defendants' motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Under Oklahoma law, a certificate of birth must be filed with the Oklahoma State Registrar shortly after birth. See 63 O.S. § 1-311(A). The individual preparing the certificate, typically the attending physician, "shall certify to the facts of birth and provide the medical information required by the certificate . . ." See id. § 1-311(B). This includes information such as the date and time of birth, the child's name, the names of the parents, and the child's sex (the "sex designation").2 By signing the certificate worksheet, the parent "attest[s] to the accuracy of the personal data entered thereon . . ." See id. § 1-311(E).

Prior to April 2022, 63 O.S. § 1-321 authorized the Oklahoma State Department of Health ("OSDH") Commissioner to amend a birth certificate in the following situations: (1) to reflect a person's new legal name change; (2) to show paternity, if paternity was not shown on the original birth certificate; (3) to change the surname of a child born out of wedlock; and (4) "in accordance with [the] regulations . . . adopted by the State Commissioner of Health." 63 O.S. § 1-321(A), (C), (D), (E). The applicable regulations authorized the following amendments: (1) "Name added to certificate if item blank"; (2) "erroneous entries"; and (3) to "correct[ ] an error or misstatement of fact as to any non medical information." See Okla. Admin. Code § 310:105-3-3(a)-(d). Under § 1-321(A), all other amendments were prohibited: "A certificate or record registered under this article may be amended only in accordance with this article and regulations thereunder adopted by the State Commissioner of Health . . . ." 63 O.S. § 1-321(A) (emphasis added).

From at least 2007 until late-2021, Oklahoma state district courts and OSDH allowed transgender people to amend the sex designation on their birth certificates to match their gender identity. (Doc. 41 at 2, 12.) Between 2018 and 2021, OSDH amended the sex designations on the birth certificates of more than one hundred transgender people to match their gender identity. (Id. at 12.)

In early 2021, each of the Plaintiffs filed Petitions for Change of Name and Gender Marker and eventually obtained "court orders directing that the [Plaintiff's] birth certificate be amended to match their gender identity." (See id. at 14, 17-18, 22-23, 25-26.) On August 18, 2021, the District Court of Tulsa County granted Plaintiff Rowan Fowler's Petition. (Id. at 17.) "In addition to changing her name, the August 18, 2021 court order . . . also ordered, adjudged, and decreed that Ms. Fowler is female; that any designation by Oklahoma agencies of Ms. Fowler being anything other than female is incorrect; and that she shall be designated as female on official documents generated, issued, or maintained in the State of Oklahoma." (Id.) Plaintiff Allister Hall obtained a similar order on August 24, 2021. (Id. at 22.) And Plaintiff Carter Ray obtained a similar order on June 24, 2021.3 (Id. at 25.) After obtaining their orders, Plaintiffs promptly sought to amend their birth certificates by providing OSDH with a copy of the court order and paying the requisite fee. (Id. at 18, 22, 25.)

Up until that point, the parties agree that it was OSDH's practice to grant such applications and make the necessary amendments. (See id. at 12; Doc. 24 at 11 ("[OSDH] complied with those court orders, believing Oklahoma law required said compliance notwithstanding the need to protect the integrity and accuracy of vital statistics records.")) However, this practice apparently ended in October 2021 as the result of litigation commenced by a plaintiff who sought an amended birth certificate with a gender-neutral designation. Commissioner of Health Lance Frye and other OSDH officials eventually entered into a settlement which enabled the plaintiff to obtain an amended birth certificate with a non-binary, gender-neutral designation. (Doc. 41 at 12-13.)

In response to this settlement, Governor Stitt issued a statement on October 21, 2021, in which he stated that: "I believe that people are created by God to be male or female. Period." (Id. at 13.) He further stated that: "There is no such thing as non-binary sex, and I wholeheartedly condemn the OSDH court settlement that was entered into by rogue activists who acted without receiving proper approval or oversight. I will be taking whatever action necessary to protect Oklahoma values." (Id.) The following day, on October 22, Commissioner Frye announced his resignation, which was effective immediately. (Id.)

On November 8, 2021, Governor Stitt issued Executive Order 2021-24 ("Executive Order"), which ordered the OSDH to "[c]ease amending birth certificates that is in any way inconsistent with 63 O.S. § 1-321." The Executive Order provides, in full:

It has come to my attention that the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) has entered into a settlement agreement which was not reviewed or approved by my Administration. This settlement requires OSDH to amend birth certificates in a manner not permitted under Oklahoma Law. This Order ensures that this unauthorized action will be corrected.
63 O.S. § 1-321 establishes how and when a birth certificate may be amended under Oklahoma Law. Neither this statute nor Oklahoma law otherwise provide OSDH or others any legal ability to in any way alter a person's sex or gender on a birth certificate. Moreover, neither this statute, nor OSDH's administrative rules, give the agency authority to enter agreements that circumvent the laws of this state.
Therefore, I, J. Kevin Stitt, Governor of the State of Oklahoma, pursuant to the power vested in me by Article VI of the Oklahoma Constitution, hereby order that OSDH immediately:
1. Cease amending birth certificates that is in any way inconsistent with 63 O.S. § 1-321.
2. Remove from its website any reference to amending birth certificates that is inconsistent with its authority under 63 O.S. § 1-321. 3. Inform the Governor's office of any pending litigation that is related to amending birth certificates in Oklahoma.
4. Provide the Governor's office with any other information that OSDH feels is responsive to this Executive Order.
I also encourage our lawmakers, upon reconvening for the 2nd Regular Session of the 58th Legislature this coming February to:
1. Immediately pass legislation that will clarify, to the extent necessary, that changes in sex or gender on a birth certificate or a designation of non-binary is contrary to Oklahoma Law.
2. Include in the legislation a provision that requires the Commissioner of Health to promulgate any administrative rules necessary to effectuate the purposes of this statute.

Okla. Admin. Code § 1:2021-24 (Nov. 8, 2021).

Plaintiffs' applications were all denied between January and March 2022 when they received an email from Defendant Baker "which invoked the Governor's Executive Order in the denial." (Doc. 41 at 18, 23, 26.) Plaintiffs allege that Governor Stitt and his office have enforced the Executive Order by specifically instructing OSDH officials that they cannot correct the birth certificates of transgender people to reflect their male or female gender identity. (Id. at 14.)

On April 26, 2022, Governor Stitt signed into law Senate Bill 1100 ("SB1100"), which amends 63 O.S. § 1-321 by adding the following provision: "Beginning on the effective date of this act, the biological sex designation on a certificate of birth amended under this section shall be either male or female and shall not be nonbinary or any symbol representing a nonbinary designation including but not limited to the letter 'X' ". 63 O.S. § 1-321(H) (2022); see also 2022 Okla. Sess. Laws, c. 87, § 4, emerg. eff. April 26, 2022.

Since then, Oklahoma officials have denied the requests of other transgender people to amend the sex designation on their birth certificate to match their gender identity. (Doc. 41 at 13-14.) They have denied such requests even where they were accompanied by court orders directing that the transgender person's birth certificate be amended to match their gender identity. (Id. at 14.) OSDH officials have stated that they believe they cannot grant such requests because of the Executive Order. (Id.) Oklahoma continues to permit other changes to birth certificates (such as for adoption and legal name).

On March 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against Governor Stitt, OSDH Commissioner of Health Keith Reed, and State...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex