Sign Up for Vincent AI
Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Org.
For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Allon Kedem, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C. (Kent A. Yalowitz, Avishai D. Don, David C. Russell, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, New York, NY, Dirk C. Phillips, Stephen K. Wirth, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C., Jeffrey Fleischmann, The Law Office Of Jeffrey Fleischmann, P.C., New York, NY, Samuel Silverman, The Silverman Law Firm, PLLC, New City, NY, on the brief).
For Defendants-Appellees: Mitchell R. Berger, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington, D.C. (Gassan A. Baloul, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington, D.C., on the brief).
For Intervenor-Appellant: Benjamin H. Torrance, Assistant United States Attorney, Of Counsel for Damian Williams, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY (Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Sharon Swingle, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief).
For Amicus Curiae Abraham D. Sofaer and Louis J. Freeh, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Intervenor-Appellant: Tejinder Singh, Sparacino PLLC, Washington, D.C.
For Amici Curiae Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, Rep. Claudia Tenney, Rep. Bradley E. Schneider, Sen. James Lankford, Sen. Marco Rubio, Rep. Kathleen Rice, Rep. Lee Zeldin, Rep. Theodore Deutch, and Rep. Grace Meng, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Intervenor-Appellant: J. Carl Cecere, Cecere PC, Dallas, TX.
For Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Scholars Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants: Joshua E. Abraham, Abraham Esq. PLLC, New York, NY.
For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Kent A. Yalowitz, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY (Avishai D. Don, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer, LLP, New York, NY, Allon Kedem, Dirk C. Phillips, Stephen K. Wirth, Bailey M. Roe, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C., on the brief).
For Defendants-Appellees: Mitchell R. Berger, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington, D.C. (Gassan A. Baloul, Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Washington, D.C., on the brief).
For Intervenor-Appellant: Benjamin H. Torrance, Assistant United States Attorney, Of Counsel for Damian Williams, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY (Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Sharon Swingle, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief).
For Amicus Curiae Abraham D. Sofaer and Louis J. Freeh, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Intervenor-Appellant: Tejinder Singh, Sparacino PLLC, Washington, D.C.
For Amici Curiae Senators and Representatives Charles E. Grassley, Jerrold Nadler, Richard Blumenthal, James Lankford, Sheldon Whitehouse, Kathleen Rice, Bradley E. J. Carl Cecere, Cecere PC, Dallas, TX. Schneider, and Grace Meng, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Intervenor-Appellant:
For Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Scholars Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants: Joshua E. Abraham, Abraham Esq. PLLC, New York, NY.
For Amici Curiae Providing Support to Victims of Terror, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants: Dina Gielchinsky, Osen LLC, Hackensack, NJ.
For Amici Curiae American Association for Justice, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants: Tad Thomas, Jeffrey R. White, American Association for Justice, Washington, D.C.
Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR., RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F. BIANCO, MICHAEL H. PARK, WILLIAM J. NARDINI, STEVEN J. MENASHI, EUNICE C. LEE, BETH ROBINSON, MYRNA PÉREZ, SARAH A. L. MERRIAM, MARIA ARAÚJO KAHN Circuit Judges.
Joseph F. Bianco, Circuit Judge, concurs by opinion in the denial of rehearing en banc.
Steven J. Menashi, Circuit Judge, joined by Debra Ann Livingston, Chief Judge, Michael H. Park, Circuit Judge, and joined in Part I by Richard J. Sullivan, Circuit Judge, dissents by opinion from the denial of rehearing en banc.
Pierre N. Leval, Circuit Judge, filed a statement with respect to the denial of rehearing en banc.
Alison J. Nathan, Circuit Judge, took no part in the consideration or decision of the petition.
The above appeals are consolidated for the purposes of this order. Following disposition of the appeals in these cases on September 8, 2023, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Intervenor-Appellant filed petitions for rehearing en banc and an active judge of the Court thereafter requested a poll on whether to rehear the case en banc. A poll having been conducted and there being no majority favoring en banc review, the petition for rehearing en banc is hereby DENIED.
I concur in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc and, as a member of the unanimous panel issuing the opinions that are the subject of the petition, write to explain my disagreement with the views expressed by the dissent.
As discussed in the panel opinions in these cases, and discussed in greater detail below, although these appeals involved the question of personal jurisdiction in the context of a novel statutory structure, the analysis in both opinions followed clear precedent from the Supreme Court and did not articulate any new legal rule. In contrast, the dissent proposes a new rule of "deemed consent" or "constructive consent" for purposes of personal jurisdiction, which has never been...
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting