Case Law G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.

G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.

Document Cited Authorities (48) Cited in (173) Related (5)

ARGUED: Joshua A. Block, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York, for Appellant. David Patrick Corrigan, Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Rebecca K. Glenberg, Gail Deady, American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia Foundation, Inc., Richmond, Virginia; Leslie Cooper, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York, for Appellant. Jeremy D. Capps, M. Scott Fisher, Jr., Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Cynthia Cook Robertson, Washington, D.C., Narumi Ito, Amy L. Pierce, Los Angeles, California, Alexander P. Hardiman, Shawn P. Thomas, New York, New York, Richard M. Segal, Nathaniel R. Smith, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, San Diego, California; Tara L. Borelli, Atlanta, Georgia, Kyle A. Palazzolo, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Chicago, Illinois; Alison Pennington, Transgender Law Center, Oakland, California, for Amici School Administrators Judy Chiasson, David Vannasdall, Diana K. Bruce, Denise Palazzo, Jeremy Majeski, Thomas A. Aberli, Robert Bourgeois, Mary Doran, Valeria Silva, Rudy Rudolph, John O'Reilly, Lisa Love, Dylan Pauly, and Sherie Hohs. Suzanne B. Goldberg, Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic, Columbia Law School, New York, New York; Erin E. Buzuvis, Western New England University School of Law, Springfield, Massachusetts, for Amici The National Women's Law Center, Legal Momentum, The Association of Title IX Administrators, Equal Rights Advocates, Gender Justice, The Women's Law Project, Legal Voice, Legal Aid Society–Employment Law Center, Southwest Women's Law Center, and California Women's Law Center. Jennifer Levi, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, Boston, Massachusetts; Thomas M. Hefferon, Washington, D.C., Mary K. Dulka, New York, New York, Christine Dieter, Jaime A. Santos, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, Massachusetts; Shannon Minter, Asaf Orr, National Center for Lesbian Rights, San Francisco, California, for Amici The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, Pediatric Endocrine Society, Child and Adolescent Gender Center Clinic at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Gender & Sex Development Program at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Fan Free Clinic, Whitman–Walker Clinic, Inc., GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBT Equality, Transgender Law & Policy Institute, Michelle Forcier, M.D. and Norman Spack, M.D. David Dinielli, Rick Mula, Southern Poverty Law Center, Montgomery, Alabama, for Amici Gender Benders, Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network, Gay–Straight Alliance Network, InsideOut, Evie Priestman, Rosmy, Time Out Youth, and We Are Family. James Cole, Jr., General Counsel, Francisco Lopez, Vanessa Santos, Michelle Tucker, Attorneys, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Education, Washington, D.C.; Gregory B. Friel, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Diana K. Flynn, Sharon M. McGowan, Christine A. Monta, Attorneys, Civil Rights Division, Appellate Section, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Amicus United States of America. Alan Wilson, Attorney General, Robert D. Cook, Solicitor General, James Emory Smith, Jr., Deputy Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Amicus State of South Carolina; Mark Brnovich, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, for Amicus State of Arizona; Jim Hood, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi, for Amicus State of Mississippi; Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Amicus State of West Virginia; Amicus Paul R. LePage, Governor, State of Maine, Augusta, Maine; Robert C. Stephens, Jr., Jonathan R. Harris, Counsel for the Governor of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Amicus Patrick L. McCrory, Governor of North Carolina. Mary E. McAlister, Lynchburg, Virginia, Mathew D. Staver, Anita L. Staver, Horatio G. Mihet, Liberty Counsel, Orlando, Florida, for Amici Liberty Center for Child Protection and Judith Reisman, PhD. Jeremy D. Tedesco, Scottsdale, Arizona, Jordan Lorence, Washington, D.C., David A. Cortman, J. Matthew Sharp, Rory T. Gray, Alliance Defending Freedom, Lawrenceville, Georgia, for Amici The Family Foundation of Virginia, John Walsh, Lorraine Walsh, Mark Frechette, Jon Lynsky, Bradly Friedlin, Lisa Terry, Lee Terry, Donald Caulder, Wendy Caulder, Kim Ward, Alice May, Jim Rutan, Issac Rutan, Doretha Guju, Rodney Autry, James Larsen, David Thornton, Kathy Thornton, Joshua Cuba, Claudia Clifton, Ilona Gambill, and Tim Byrd. Lawrence J. Joseph, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund.

Before NIEMEYER and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Senior Judge DAVIS joined. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

FLOYD, Circuit Judge:

G.G., a transgender boy, seeks to use the boys' restrooms at his high school. After G.G. began to use the boys' restrooms with the approval of the school administration, the local school board passed a policy banning G.G. from the boys' restroom.

G.G. alleges that the school board impermissibly discriminated against him in violation of Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. The district court dismissed G.G.'s Title IX claim and denied his request for a preliminary injunction. This appeal followed. Because we conclude the district court did not accord appropriate deference to the relevant Department of Education regulations, we reverse its dismissal of G.G.'s Title IX claim. Because we conclude that the district court used the wrong evidentiary standard in assessing G.G.'s motion for a preliminary injunction, we vacate its denial and remand for consideration under the correct standard. We therefore reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I.

At the heart of this appeal is whether Title IX requires schools to provide transgender students access to restrooms congruent with their gender identity. Title IX provides: [n]o person ... shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a). The Department of Education's (the Department) regulations implementing Title IX permit the provision of “separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex, but such facilities provided for students of one sex shall be comparable to such facilities for students of the other sex.” 34 C.F.R. § 106.33. In an opinion letter dated January 7, 2015, the Department's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) interpreted how this regulation should apply to transgender individuals: “When a school elects to separate or treat students differently on the basis of sex ... a school generally must...

5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2016
Action NC v. Strach, 1:15-cv-1063
"...hearsay or other inadmissible evidence when deciding whether a preliminary injunction is warranted." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 726 (4th Cir. 2016), stay and recall of mandate granted on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2442, 195 L.Ed.2d 888 (2016..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2018
Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.
"...G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 132 F.Supp.3d 736, 753 (E.D. Va. 2015), rev'd in part and vacated in part , 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016). An interlocutory appeal of those decisions followed, leading to appellate review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Ci..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio – 2016
Bd. of Educ. of the Highland Local Sch. Dist. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.
"...the Department's interpretation—determining maleness or femaleness with reference to gender identity." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 720 (4th Cir.2016), mandate recalled and stayed , Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G. ex rel. Grimm , –––U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
7-Eleven #22360 v. United States
"...hearsay or other inadmissible evidence when deciding whether a preliminary injunction is warranted." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 725–26 (4th Cir. 2016), vacated on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 1239, 197 L.Ed.2d 460 (2017) (Mem.); see Profiles,..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...irreparable harm before a later trial governed by the full rigor of usual evidentiary standards ...." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 725–26 (4th Cir. 2016), vacated on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 1239, 197 L.Ed.2d 460 (2017) ; see Profiles, Inc...."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. XXIV-2, January 2023 – 2023
Athletics and title IX of the 1972 education amendments
"...Student Athletes , 27 MARQ. SPORTS L. REV. 449, 461 (Spring 2017). 206. See, e.g ., G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 715 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. granted in part , 137 S. Ct. 369 (2016), and vacated , 2017 WL 855755 (Mar. 6, 2017) (remanding for Fourth Circuit to..."
Document | Núm. XXIV-2, January 2023 – 2023
Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
"...& Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150 (1897); Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 197 (1976). 14. See Grimm v. Gloucester City Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 723 (4th Cir. 2016); Glenn , 663 F.3d at 1317; Barnes v. City of Cincinnati, 401 F.3d 729, 737 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. City of Salem, 378 F...."
Document | Chapter 4 Motions
4.2 Motions for Preliminary Injunction
"...Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2949 (3d ed. 2014).[958] See G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 725-26 (4th Cir. 2016), vacated and remanded by Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G., 580 U.S. 1168 (2017).[959] See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d); Alberti..."
Document | Vol. 132 Núm. 4, February 2023 – 2023
Sex Equality's Irreconcilable Differences.
"...which permit sex segregation in bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers, among other spaces. See Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 720 (4th Cir. 2016) (noting that the Department of Education's "repeated formulation" of "one sex" and the "other sex" in its regulations implementi..."
Document | Núm. XXIII-2, January 2022 – 2022
Athletics & title IX of the 1972 education amendments
"...Student Athletes , 27 MARQ. SPORTS L. REV. 449, 461 (Spring 2017). 235. See, e.g ., G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 715 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. granted in part , 137 S.Ct. 369 (2016), and vacated , 2017 WL 855755 (Mar. 6, 2017) (remanding for Fourth Circuit to f..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial
5 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2017
CAS Legal Mailbag Question of the Week – December, 2017
"...was highly controversial, and it played a major part in the leading case on this subject. In that case, G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016), the Fourth Circuit reversed the lower court ruling and ruled that the plaintiff should be permitted to ..."
Document | LexBlog United States – 2017
CAS Legal Mailbag Question of the Week – 12/12/2017
"...was highly controversial, and it played a major part in the leading case on this subject. In that case, G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016), the Fourth Circuit reversed the lower court ruling and ruled that the plaintiff should be permitted to ..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2016
Quirky Question #286: Best Practices on Restroom Access and Terminology for Transgender Employees
"...a male) sought to use the boys’ restroom at his elementary school, which the school district initially allowed. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016). But after receiving numerous complaints from concerned parents, the school board held two public meetings to disc..."
Document | LexBlog United States – 2016
United States Supreme Court to Hear Case Concerning Transgender Student Rights under Title IX
"...Court of the United States granted certiorari to review the prominent 4th Circuit Court of Appeals case G.G. v. Gloucester County Board of Education, 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016). The case is expected to be decided before next summer and likely will shed some amount of light on this nationa..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2017
More Than A “Bathroom Mandate”: Gender Identity Discrimination Under Titles VII And IX In The Trump Era
"...maintain the protections they put in place for LGBT employees and students. Danielle Petaja Jessica Meller G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir.), cert. granted in part, 137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 283 On March 28, 2017, the United States Supreme Court wil..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 books and journal articles
Document | Núm. XXIV-2, January 2023 – 2023
Athletics and title IX of the 1972 education amendments
"...Student Athletes , 27 MARQ. SPORTS L. REV. 449, 461 (Spring 2017). 206. See, e.g ., G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 715 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. granted in part , 137 S. Ct. 369 (2016), and vacated , 2017 WL 855755 (Mar. 6, 2017) (remanding for Fourth Circuit to..."
Document | Núm. XXIV-2, January 2023 – 2023
Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
"...& Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150 (1897); Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 197 (1976). 14. See Grimm v. Gloucester City Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 723 (4th Cir. 2016); Glenn , 663 F.3d at 1317; Barnes v. City of Cincinnati, 401 F.3d 729, 737 (6th Cir. 2005); Smith v. City of Salem, 378 F...."
Document | Chapter 4 Motions
4.2 Motions for Preliminary Injunction
"...Miller & Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2949 (3d ed. 2014).[958] See G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 725-26 (4th Cir. 2016), vacated and remanded by Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G., 580 U.S. 1168 (2017).[959] See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d); Alberti..."
Document | Vol. 132 Núm. 4, February 2023 – 2023
Sex Equality's Irreconcilable Differences.
"...which permit sex segregation in bathrooms, locker rooms, and showers, among other spaces. See Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 720 (4th Cir. 2016) (noting that the Department of Education's "repeated formulation" of "one sex" and the "other sex" in its regulations implementi..."
Document | Núm. XXIII-2, January 2022 – 2022
Athletics & title IX of the 1972 education amendments
"...Student Athletes , 27 MARQ. SPORTS L. REV. 449, 461 (Spring 2017). 235. See, e.g ., G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709, 715 (4th Cir. 2016), cert. granted in part , 137 S.Ct. 369 (2016), and vacated , 2017 WL 855755 (Mar. 6, 2017) (remanding for Fourth Circuit to f..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
Document | U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina – 2016
Action NC v. Strach, 1:15-cv-1063
"...hearsay or other inadmissible evidence when deciding whether a preliminary injunction is warranted." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 726 (4th Cir. 2016), stay and recall of mandate granted on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 2442, 195 L.Ed.2d 888 (2016..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia – 2018
Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.
"...G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 132 F.Supp.3d 736, 753 (E.D. Va. 2015), rev'd in part and vacated in part , 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016). An interlocutory appeal of those decisions followed, leading to appellate review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Ci..."
Document | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio – 2016
Bd. of Educ. of the Highland Local Sch. Dist. v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.
"...the Department's interpretation—determining maleness or femaleness with reference to gender identity." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 720 (4th Cir.2016), mandate recalled and stayed , Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. G.G. ex rel. Grimm , –––U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. ..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
7-Eleven #22360 v. United States
"...hearsay or other inadmissible evidence when deciding whether a preliminary injunction is warranted." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 725–26 (4th Cir. 2016), vacated on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 1239, 197 L.Ed.2d 460 (2017) (Mem.); see Profiles,..."
Document | U.S. District Court — District of Maryland – 2021
Just Puppies, Inc. v. Frosh
"...irreparable harm before a later trial governed by the full rigor of usual evidentiary standards ...." G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd. , 822 F.3d 709, 725–26 (4th Cir. 2016), vacated on other grounds , ––– U.S. ––––, 137 S. Ct. 1239, 197 L.Ed.2d 460 (2017) ; see Profiles, Inc...."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 firm's commentaries
Document | JD Supra United States – 2017
CAS Legal Mailbag Question of the Week – December, 2017
"...was highly controversial, and it played a major part in the leading case on this subject. In that case, G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016), the Fourth Circuit reversed the lower court ruling and ruled that the plaintiff should be permitted to ..."
Document | LexBlog United States – 2017
CAS Legal Mailbag Question of the Week – 12/12/2017
"...was highly controversial, and it played a major part in the leading case on this subject. In that case, G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board, 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016), the Fourth Circuit reversed the lower court ruling and ruled that the plaintiff should be permitted to ..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2016
Quirky Question #286: Best Practices on Restroom Access and Terminology for Transgender Employees
"...a male) sought to use the boys’ restroom at his elementary school, which the school district initially allowed. Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016). But after receiving numerous complaints from concerned parents, the school board held two public meetings to disc..."
Document | LexBlog United States – 2016
United States Supreme Court to Hear Case Concerning Transgender Student Rights under Title IX
"...Court of the United States granted certiorari to review the prominent 4th Circuit Court of Appeals case G.G. v. Gloucester County Board of Education, 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir. 2016). The case is expected to be decided before next summer and likely will shed some amount of light on this nationa..."
Document | JD Supra United States – 2017
More Than A “Bathroom Mandate”: Gender Identity Discrimination Under Titles VII And IX In The Trump Era
"...maintain the protections they put in place for LGBT employees and students. Danielle Petaja Jessica Meller G.G. ex rel. Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 822 F.3d 709 (4th Cir.), cert. granted in part, 137 S. Ct. 369, 196 L. Ed. 2d 283 On March 28, 2017, the United States Supreme Court wil..."

Try vLex and Vincent AI for free

Start a free trial