Grievance Comm. for the Ninth Judicial Dist. v. Lynch (In re Lynch)

174 A.D.3d 39

99 N.Y.S.3d 720 (Mem)

In the MATTER OF Kyle Thomas LYNCH, a suspended attorney.

Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, Petitioner;

v.Kyle Thomas Lynch, Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 4183125)

2018–14294

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

June 5, 2019

Gary L. Casella, White Plains, N.Y. (Forrest Strauss of counsel), for petitioner.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, MARK C. DILLON, RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ.

OPINION & ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On April 20, 2018, the respondent pleaded guilty before the Honorable Mark. D. Cohen, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to three counts of grand larceny in the second degree, in violation of Penal Law § 155.40, a class C felony; grand larceny in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 155.35, a class D felony; two counts of identity theft in the first degree, in violation of Penal Law § 190.80(1), a class D felony; and two counts of unlawful possession of personal identification information in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 190.81, a class A misdemeanor.

The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District moves to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b) based upon his felony conviction. Although the respondent was duly served, he has neither opposed the motion nor interposed any response thereto.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a), the respondent was automatically disbarred and ceased to be an attorney upon his conviction of a felony.

Accordingly, the motion to strike the respondent's name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b), is granted to reflect the respondent's automatic disbarment as of April 20, 2018.

ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(a), the respondent, Kyle Thomas Lynch, a suspended attorney, is disbarred, effective April 20, 2018, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(4)(b) ; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent, Kyle Thomas Lynch, shall continue to comply with the rules governing the conduct of disbarred or suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 1240.15 ); and it is further,

ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Kyle Thomas Lynch, is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk, or employee...