Sign Up for Vincent AI
Hale v. Shoop
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Petitioner Delano Hale ("Hale" or "petitioner") was convicted and sentenced to death in the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court for the aggravated murder of Douglas Green. Hale filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the constitutionality of his convictions and sentences. (Doc. No. 13.1) He later amended his twenty-sixth ground for relief. (Doc. No. 24-1.) Respondent Warden Timothy Shoop ("Shoop" or "respondent") filed a return of writ to the petition and amended claim. (Doc. Nos. 17, 28.) Hale filed a traverse (Doc. No. 31), and respondent filed a sur-reply. (Doc. No. 33.) For the reasons stated below, Hale's petition (including the amended twenty-sixth ground for relief) is DENIED.
The Ohio Supreme Court set forth the following facts underlying Hale's convictions:
State v. Hale, 892 N.E.2d 864, 877-879 (Ohio 2008).
These factual findings "shall be presumed to be correct," and Hale has "the burden of rebutting the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1); Warren v. Smith, 161 F.3d 358, 360-361 (6th Cir. 1998).
A Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Grand Jury indicted Hale on July 28, 2004, for the aggravated murder of Douglas Green. (Doc. 7-1 at 33-39.2) Hale was charged with two counts of aggravated murder, one under Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.01(A) () and the other under Ohio Rev. Code § 2903.01(B) (). (Id. at 34-35.) Each aggravated-murder count carried a capital specification for felony murder, alleging murder during an aggravated robbery, as well as firearm, prior-conviction, and repeat-violent-offender specifications. (Id.) Hale also was charged with aggravatedrobbery, tampering with evidence, escape, and having a weapon while under disability. (Id. at 36-39.)3 Hale entered pleas of not guilty to all charges. (Id. at 40.)
Hale's trial began on May 9, 2005. (See Doc. No. 8-1 (Trial Tr.) at 226.) He was represented by G. Kenneth Mullin and David Magee of the Cuyahoga County Public Defender's Office and Jillian Davis. (See, e.g., Doc. No. 7-1 at 150.)
The jury convicted Hale on all charges and specifications on June 7, 2005. (Doc. No. 7-2 at 182.) On July 5, 2005, Hale entered a plea of guilty to the escape charge and stipulated to the prior conviction underlying the charge of carrying a weapon while under disability. (Doc. No. 8-5 (Trial Tr.) at 787-89.)
The penalty phase of the trial began on June 13, 2005, and three days later, the jury recommended that Hale be sentenced to death. (Doc. No. 7-2 at 213.) On July 18, 2005, the trial court accepted the jury's recommendation and imposed a death sentence on the merged counts of aggravated murder. (Id. at 267.) The court also imposed consecutive prison sentences of ten years for the aggravated-robbery charge, with an additional three years for the attached firearms specification, and eight years for the escape charge; and prison sentences of five years each for the tampering-with-evidence and weapons-while-under-disability charges, which were to run concurrently with the murder charges. (Id.)
Hale filed a timely appeal of his convictions and sentences directly to the Ohio Supreme Court. (Doc. No. 7-3 at 5-7.) He was represented by Kelly Culshaw, Ruth Tkacz, and KimberlyRigby of the Ohio Public Defender's Office. (See id.) In his merit brief, Hale presented twenty-two propositions of law, stated as follows:
Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting