Sign Up for Vincent AI
Healthpromed Found., Inc. v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
Nicole M. Bacon, with whom James L. Feldesman, Washington, DC, Khatereh S. Ghiladi, and Feldesman Tucker Liefer Fidell LLP were on brief, for appellants Atlantic Medical Center, Inc., Camuy Health Services, Inc., Centro de Salud Familiar Dr. Julio Palmieri Ferri, Inc., Ciales Primary Health Care Services, Inc., Corporacion de Serv. Médicos Primarios y Prevención de Hatillo, Inc., Costa Salud, Inc., El Centro de Salud de Lares, Inc., El Centro de Servicios Primarios de Salud de Patillas, Inc., and Hospital General Castañar, Inc.
Robert A. Graham, with whom Iyen A. Acosta, Washington, DC, and Reno & Cavanaugh, PLLC were on brief, for appellants HealthproMed, Salud Integral en la Montaña, Migrant Health Center, COSSMA, Morovis Community Health Center, NeoMed Center, and Concilio de Salud Integral de Loiza.
Carlos Lugo-Fiol, with whom Solicitor General of Puerto Rico Isaías Sánchez-Báez was on brief, for appellees Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and Lorenzo González-Feliciano, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health for Puerto Rico.
Before Lynch, Lipez, and Barron, Circuit Judges.
These consolidated appeals, and the companion appeal No. 19-1336, arise out of the long-running litigation between Puerto Rico and several Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) over the Commonwealth's failure to make payments to the FQHCs. The FQHCs assert new claims that the Commonwealth has again failed to pay in full the statutorily required reimbursement amounts for the services they provide to poor patients under the Medicaid Act. We dismiss these appeals without reaching the merits, because we conclude that the orders appealed from are void -- having been issued in violation of the stay entered by the Title III court.
The Medicaid Act requires FQHCs to provide care to underserved populations. States must reimburse the FQHCs for the full cost of these services through a Prospective Payment System (PPS). 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(bb)(1)-(3). Puerto Rico has contracted with Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) to run its Medicaid program. The MCOs in turn contract with FQHCs to deliver services as required. When the MCOs pay less than the PPS rate, Puerto Rico1 must make up the difference through quarterly supplemental "wraparound" payments. Id. § 1396a(bb)(5).
This litigation has been ongoing since 2003, when the FQHCs first sued the Commonwealth for failure to make the required wraparound payments. The factual and procedural history behind these appeals is described in our eight prior opinions in this matter, including most recently in Municipality of San Juan v. Puerto Rico, 919 F.3d 565 (1st Cir. 2019).2
In 2009, the district court appointed a Special Master to oversee the Medicaid payment calculations. In 2010, at the recommendation of the Special Master, the district court entered a preliminary injunction3 requiring the Commonwealth to make interim payments calculated by the Special Master, and directing the parties to calculate the actual PPS rates and then reconcile the interim payments with the amount actually due under the appropriate PPS formula.4
By the fourth quarter of 2014, the scope of services that the FQHCs provide had changed. The Medicaid Act obligates the Commonwealth to recalculate the PPS rates to account for the changes in the scope of service. 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(bb)(3)(B). The district court ordered the Special Master to calculate the appropriate PPS rates for the period beginning with the fourth quarter of 2014, and reconcile those rates with the interim payments that the Commonwealth continued to make.
In April 2017, the Special Master issued a report and recommendation, which resolved the parties' disputes over the methodology for calculating the PPS rates, but which led to these appeals. The Special Master recommended that the revised PPS rates be made effective January 1, 2017, rather than the full reconciliation period beginning in the fourth quarter of 2014, in order to "promote[ ] finality, efficiency, and realistic cost saving targets ... [and] prevent the administrative burden and uncertainty that ... retroactive application would imply."
In 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA), which authorized Puerto Rico to file for the equivalent of bankruptcy protection under Title III of the Act. 48 U.S.C. §§ 2161 - 2177. On May 3, 2017, Puerto Rico invoked Title III under PROMESA, and triggered an automatic bankruptcy stay.5
After the PROMESA stay took effect, on May 10, 2017, the district court in this litigation adopted the Special Master's April 2017 report and recommendation, approved an agreed-upon formula for calculating Medicaid wraparound payments going forward, and made the new formula effective from January 1, 2017. In August, 2017, the FQHCs brought these consolidated appeals.
In 2019, this court held that the automatic stay applies to the orders at issue in this appeal. Mun. of San Juan, 919 F.3d at 581-82. On June 21, 2019, this court stayed these appeals, which were already in abeyance,6 in light of our decision in Municipality of San Juan.
On July 29, 2019, the parties entered and submitted a stipulation to the Title III court in an effort on their part to permit these appeals to move forward. The stipulation states:
The Title III Stay is hereby modified solely to the limited extent necessary to allow (a) the pending appeals for the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Appeals Nos. 17-1731, 17-1812, and 19-1336 to proceed to judgment [and (b) to continue to allow the Commonwealth to make the wraparound payments under the existing formula.]
The Title III court adopted this stipulation without modification in its Eleventh Omnibus Order Granting Relief from the Automatic Stay. We then ordered briefing.
After these appeals were filed, on December 31, 2018, the Special Master issued another report and recommendation, which, among other things, recommended that the district court revise the effective date of the new PPS rates to January 1, 2019, in light of Puerto Rico's financial circumstances. The district court did not adopt this proposal, and left the January 1, 2017, effective date in place. The Commonwealth appealed that decision in appeal No. 19-1336.
As to the merits, the FQHCs attempt to challenge the effective date of the revised PPS rates and other portions of the district court's order adopting the Special Master's report and recommendation. Because the orders are void, we cannot reach the merits of these issues, and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Our decision in Municipality of San Juan makes clear that the automatic stay applies to the Medicaid litigation. 919 F.3d at 581-82. The stay became effective May 3, 2017, seven days before the district court's order. An order which post-dates the stay is void. In re Soares, 107 F.3d 969, 976-77 (1st Cir. 1997) (). A void order is a "legal nullity." United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260, 270, 130 S.Ct. 1367, 176 L.Ed.2d 158 (2010). It is "without legal effect." Baella-Silva v. Hulsey, 454 F.3d 5, 10 (1st Cir. 2006) (quoting Fafel v. DiPaola, 399 F.3d 403, 410 (1st Cir. 2005) ).
If the orders underlying this appeal are "without legal effect," we lack jurisdiction to decide their merits. See Preiser v....
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting