Sign Up for Vincent AI
Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341
5 cases
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
"...was not provided by Astolfi) counsel cannot be a witness and advocate in the same proceeding on an important issue: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para 50 (footnote 37); RT v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 655 at para 32; RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 441 at para 28. Accordingly, counsel should not purport to ..."
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
"...failure to comply with a mandatory rule, prior order or direction of the Court of Appeal”) (emphasis added). 86 Holden v. Holden, 2022 ABCA 341, ¶¶ 71-72 (chambers) per Wakeling, J.A. (“The fact that Mr. Holden states in his affidavit that his lawyer had been ‘..."
Jose v Baby,
"...2015 ABCA 201 at paras 20-24, 602 AR 105. A hopeless proceeding in this Court is not in the interest of any party: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 22, 62, 87, [2022] AJ No 1224 (QL) citing various [12] Applying either..."
Nkusi v Patricia C. Tiffen Professional Corporation,
"...ABCA 238 at para 5, [2015] AJ No 770 (QL); Scarlett v Wang, 2019 ABCA 72 at paras 28-29, [2019] AJ No 208; Li at para 9; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 55-68, [2022] AJ No 1224 27 Time limits are of fundamental importance to proper functioning of the Court. They are to must be resp..."
Bank of Montreal v Luciano,
"...with the passage of time and lengthy delays are much more likely to involve serious prejudice: Travis at para 30; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para 55 The potential for serious prejudice to BMO in this case was not materially explored in argument. If there is a lost opportunity to have..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
5 cases
Astolfi v Stone Creek Resorts Inc.,
"...was not provided by Astolfi) counsel cannot be a witness and advocate in the same proceeding on an important issue: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para 50 (footnote 37); RT v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 655 at para 32; RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 441 at para 28. Accordingly, counsel should not purport to ..."
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
"...failure to comply with a mandatory rule, prior order or direction of the Court of Appeal”) (emphasis added). 86 Holden v. Holden, 2022 ABCA 341, ¶¶ 71-72 (chambers) per Wakeling, J.A. (“The fact that Mr. Holden states in his affidavit that his lawyer had been ‘..."
Jose v Baby,
"...2015 ABCA 201 at paras 20-24, 602 AR 105. A hopeless proceeding in this Court is not in the interest of any party: Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 22, 62, 87, [2022] AJ No 1224 (QL) citing various [12] Applying either..."
Nkusi v Patricia C. Tiffen Professional Corporation,
"...ABCA 238 at para 5, [2015] AJ No 770 (QL); Scarlett v Wang, 2019 ABCA 72 at paras 28-29, [2019] AJ No 208; Li at para 9; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at paras 55-68, [2022] AJ No 1224 27 Time limits are of fundamental importance to proper functioning of the Court. They are to must be resp..."
Bank of Montreal v Luciano,
"...with the passage of time and lengthy delays are much more likely to involve serious prejudice: Travis at para 30; Holden v Holden, 2022 ABCA 341 at para 55 The potential for serious prejudice to BMO in this case was not materially explored in argument. If there is a lost opportunity to have..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting