Case Law Hoover v. State

Hoover v. State

Document Cited Authorities (12) Cited in Related

Attorney for Appellant: Matthew J. McGovern, Fishers, Indiana

Attorneys for Appellee: Theodore E. Rokita, Attorney General of Indiana, Evan Matthew Comer, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, John Oosterhoff, Certified Legal Intern

MEMORANDUM DECISION

May, Judge.

[1] Judson K. Hoover appeals his sentence for murder.1 He raises two issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by not recognizing Hoover's guilty plea as a significant mitigating factor; and
2. Whether Hoover's sentence is inappropriate pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B).

We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] Hoover and R.H. married in 2008. Three children were born of the marriage – fraternal twins, Be.H. and T.H., and a younger sister, Br.H. Between January 2017 and July 2020, the police came to the couple's house multiple times to investigate alleged domestic violence incidents between Hoover and R.H. On January 13, 2017, R.H. called police and reported Hoover "jumped on her back" and "bit her on her left thumb[.]" (App. Vol. II at 27.) The New Albany Police responded, but no charges were brought against Hoover. On February 25, 2020, R.H. reported that "Hoover had forced sexual intercourse with her after she told him no." (Id. ) However, R.H. stopped cooperating with police, and the investigation was closed without charges being brought against Hoover. Hoover was arrested in April 2020 and charged with Level 6 felony domestic battery in the presence of a minor2 and Level 6 felony strangulation.3 Those charges were pending against Hoover when he committed the instant offense. On July 27, 2020, R.H. reported to the New Albany Police that Hoover had sexually assaulted her again, but no charges were brought against Hoover based on the report.

[3] Hoover and R.H. both lived at the couple's house, but it was not unusual for one spouse or the other to spend the night at a hotel or somewhere else away from the home. R.H. arrived home late at night on August 2, 2020, and Hoover believed she was under the influence of methamphetamine at the time. The couple began arguing and matters escalated into physical violence, with Hoover battering and strangling R.H. Eight-year-old Be.H. later disclosed to police that he saw

his father stomp his mother in the head 20 times, wearing black boots, while she was lying on the ground next to a black refrigerator in the basement. The child also observed Judson Hoover punch [R.H.] in the stomach with a set of keys in his hands but she was unresponsive and did not move. The child observed blood coming from [R.H.’s] head and left ear.

(Id. at 9.) Hoover initially stored R.H.’s body in the house's garage, but he later put the body inside a deep freezer and moved the freezer into a storage unit he rented at a facility close to his house in New Albany. He also filed for divorce from R.H. on August 3, 2020. R.H.’s mother contacted the police on August 5, 2020, and reported that R.H. was missing. When police officers arrived to investigate the missing person case, Hoover allowed the officers to search the house. The officers did not find R.H. inside the house, and they left.

[4] Between August 14, 2020, and August 19, 2020, Hoover delivered six fifty-five-gallon barrels to his storage unit. At some point, Hoover cut the legs off R.H.’s corpse and shoved the remainder of her body inside one of the fifty-five-gallon barrels. The Floyd Circuit Court held a provisional hearing in the divorce action on August 21, 2020, and Hoover was the only party who attended. Rather than disclosing that he killed R.H., Hoover testified at the hearing that R.H. left the house to meet friends and run errands during the first week of August and never returned. The court entered a provisional order granting Hoover custody of the children and ordering R.H. to pay child support. The court granted Hoover's request for a protective order against R.H. and dismissed the petition for a protective order R.H. had filed under a separate cause number before her death.

[5] On August 27, 2020, Be.H. told a guidance counselor at his school that he had witnessed Hoover kill R.H. The school contacted the Department of Child Services ("DCS"), and DCS in turn notified the New Albany Police Department. Police officers met Hoover when he arrived at the school to pick up Be.H. The officers questioned Hoover, and he consented to allowing the officers to search his house. The officers found blood splatter on the basement steps, and they noticed that, while the basement was generally cluttered, the area where Be.H. reported the murder occurred was neat and tidy. The basement was wood paneled, and the officers also observed that there was "fresh boarding" around where Be.H. said R.H. died. (Tr. Vol. II at 35.) The police did not allow Hoover to return to the house that evening. Instead, he stayed at a nearby hotel. Early the next morning, Hoover rented a minivan and moved R.H.’s body from his New Albany storage unit to a second storage unit in Louisville, Kentucky.

[6] The police learned of Hoover's New Albany storage unit, and they obtained a warrant to search the unit. The officers "immediately smelled ... a strong odor of a decomposing body" when they opened the storage unit, but R.H.’s body was not inside the unit. (Id. at 38.) The police reviewed the storage unit facility's video surveillance footage, which showed:

• Hoover brought a "freezer and what appeared to be a tote ... with an object in it ... [that] appeared to be a body" to the storage unit on August 4, 2020;
• Hoover delivered five fifty-five-gallon barrels to the unit on August 14, 2020;
• Hoover delivered another fifty-five-gallon barrel to the unit on August 19, 2020; and
• Hoover removed a fifty-five-gallon barrel from the unit on August 28, 2020, and placed the unit inside a minivan.

(Id. at 39.)

[7] The police learned about Hoover's Louisville storage unit, and they obtained a warrant to search the unit. Officers detected the smell of a decomposing body emitting from the unit before they even opened the unit's door. In the storage unit, the officers found a blue fifty-five-gallon barrel with R.H.’s body inside. R.H.’s body was so badly decomposed by the time police discovered her that the doctors who performed the autopsy were required to use R.H.’s tattoos to identify her. The autopsy concluded that R.H. died from blunt force trauma to the head and torso.

[8] The police questioned Hoover again, and he confessed to the murder. The State charged Hoover with murder on September 3, 2020. The trial court entered a preliminary plea of not guilty on Hoover's behalf during the initial hearing. However, the trial court allowed Hoover to change his plea to guilty after the parties informed the court that they had reached a deal in which Hoover agreed to plead guilty to one count of murder, with sentencing left to the trial court's discretion, and in exchange, the State agreed not to file additional charges against Hoover. On September 22, 2020, the court appointed Dr. Daniel Hackman, a forensic psychiatrist, to "complete a psychological evaluation for the Mitigation Phase of the sentencing." (App. Vol. II at 23.) Dr. Hackman submitted his report to the court on October 18, 2020. Dr. Hackman diagnosed Hoover with alcohol use disorder and cannabis use disorder. While Hoover reported audio and visual hallucinations and cognitive deficits in his interview with Dr. Hackman, Dr. Hackman concluded that Hoover was malingering.

[9] The trial court held Hoover's sentencing hearing on November 13, 2020. After hearing evidence, the court found three significant aggravating factors: (1) the harm R.H. suffered was significant and greater than the elements necessary to prove commission of the crime; (2) Hoover committed the crime in the presence of Be.H.; and (3) the murder occurred while domestic violence charges were pending against Hoover. The court did find Hoover's decision to plead guilty to be a "moderate mitigator," and the court took note of Hoover's employment history, his education, his self-reported depression, and his claim that he was physically abused as a child. (Tr. Vol. II at 100.) The court then sentenced Hoover to a sixty-five-year term in the Indiana Department of Correction.

Discussion and Decision
I. Abuse of Discretion

[10] Our standard of review regarding a trial court's sentencing decision is well-settled:

Sentencing decisions rest within the sound discretion of the trial court, and we review such decisions for an abuse of discretion. Hudson v. State , 135 N.E.3d 973, 979 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019). "An abuse of discretion will be found where the decision is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances before the court or the reasonable, probable, and actual deductions to be drawn therefrom." Id.

Mehringer v. State , 152 N.E.3d 667, 673 (Ind. Ct. App. 2020), trans. denied. For instance, a trial court may abuse its discretion when imposing sentence by:

(1) failing to enter a sentencing statement, (2) entering a sentencing statement that explains reasons for imposing the sentence but the record does not support the reasons, (3) the sentencing statement omits reasons that are clearly supported by the record and advanced for consideration, or (4) the reasons given in the sentencing statement are improper as a matter of law.

Kimbrough v. State , 979 N.E.2d 625, 628 (Ind. 2012).

[11] Hoover argues the trial court abused its discretion "because the trial court only recognized [his] willingness to plead guilty as a ‘moderate’ mitigating circumstance rather than a significant one." (Appellant's Br. at 12.) However, a claim that the trial court improperly weighed aggravating and mitigating factors is not available for appellate review. Anglemyer v. State , 868 N.E.2d 482, 491 (Ind. ...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex