Sign Up for Vincent AI
(hope) v. County of Santa Clara.
1 cases
Kent v. California Dep't of Consumer Affairs, CIV-S-09-02905 KJM KJN PS
"...amended complaint to be filed by plaintiff. ______________________ UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 1. The court notes that DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa Clara, cited in the findings and recommendations at page 20, has been accepted for review by the California Supreme Court. DiCampli-Mintz..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trial1 firm's commentaries
Pro Te: Solutio – Vol. 11, No. 3 - 2018
"...California has no cap on either punitive or compensatory damages, and the collateral source rule applies. See Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 257 P.3d 1130 (Cal. 2011). COLORADO In Colorado, punitive damages cannot exceed the amount of compensatory damages awarded. Colo. Rev. S..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
1 cases
Kent v. California Dep't of Consumer Affairs, CIV-S-09-02905 KJM KJN PS
"...amended complaint to be filed by plaintiff. ______________________ UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 1. The court notes that DiCampli-Mintz v. County of Santa Clara, cited in the findings and recommendations at page 20, has been accepted for review by the California Supreme Court. DiCampli-Mintz..."
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
1 firm's commentaries
Pro Te: Solutio – Vol. 11, No. 3 - 2018
"...California has no cap on either punitive or compensatory damages, and the collateral source rule applies. See Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 257 P.3d 1130 (Cal. 2011). COLORADO In Colorado, punitive damages cannot exceed the amount of compensatory damages awarded. Colo. Rev. S..."