Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue),

"...la jurisprudence et si le privilège d’intérêt commun est un élément constitutif valide du secret T-126-152016 FC 1352The Minister of National Revenue (Applicant)v.Iggillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis (Respondents)andAbacus Capital Corporations Mergers and Ac..."

"...of the lawyer who wrote the opinion but who is involved in common transactions with the client of that lawyer. The Federal Court Judge (2016 FC 1352, [2017] 4 F.C.R. 80) found:(a) at paragraph 72 of his reasons, that “the memo is legal advice provided by the lawyers to theirUTeWMdYo+..."

"...for its misplaced confidence that the threat to transactional common interest privilege created by the lower court's Iggillis decision (2016 FC 1352) has been neutralized by the Federal Court of Appeal's reversal of that decision. He suggests that transactional common interest privilege "un..."

"...of this doctrine that has become known as "transactional common interest privilege." Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 (Iggillis) is significant because, in the words of the Court itself, it stands as the "first Canadian decision that concludes that [common i..."

"...Revenue will seek leave. Footnotes 1 See 2018 FCA 51. 2 See Minister of National Revenue v. IGGillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis, 2016 FC 1352. 3 See N.Y.S.3d 838 (Ct. App., 4 See Para. 42. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist..."

"...on a matter of common legal interest not related to actual or anticipated litigation." Iggillis Holdings Inc v Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 at Accordingly, if a person, such as a regulatory body, that was not a party to the transaction requested disclosure of such communication a..."

"...subset of solicitor-client privilege). However, the decision of the Federal Court in Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352, brought that into In this case, a legal opinion on tax consequences of a corporate transaction was shared between parties to the transactio..."

"...la jurisprudence et si le privilège d’intérêt commun est un élément constitutif valide du secret T-126-152016 FC 1352The Minister of National Revenue (Applicant)v.Iggillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis (Respondents)andAbacus Capital Corporations Mergers and Ac..."

"...of the lawyer who wrote the opinion but who is involved in common transactions with the client of that lawyer. The Federal Court Judge (2016 FC 1352, [2017] 4 F.C.R. 80) found:(a) at paragraph 72 of his reasons, that “the memo is legal advice provided by the lawyers to theirUTeWMdYo+..."

"...for its misplaced confidence that the threat to transactional common interest privilege created by the lower court's Iggillis decision (2016 FC 1352) has been neutralized by the Federal Court of Appeal's reversal of that decision. He suggests that transactional common interest privilege "un..."

"...of this doctrine that has become known as "transactional common interest privilege." Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 (Iggillis) is significant because, in the words of the Court itself, it stands as the "first Canadian decision that concludes that [common i..."

"...Revenue will seek leave. Footnotes 1 See 2018 FCA 51. 2 See Minister of National Revenue v. IGGillis Holdings Inc. and Ian Gillis, 2016 FC 1352. 3 See N.Y.S.3d 838 (Ct. App., 4 See Para. 42. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist..."

"...on a matter of common legal interest not related to actual or anticipated litigation." Iggillis Holdings Inc v Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352 at Accordingly, if a person, such as a regulatory body, that was not a party to the transaction requested disclosure of such communication a..."

"...subset of solicitor-client privilege). However, the decision of the Federal Court in Iggillis Holdings Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2016 FC 1352, brought that into In this case, a legal opinion on tax consequences of a corporate transaction was shared between parties to the transactio..."