Lawyer Commentary JD Supra United States Illinois First District Rejects Veil Piercing Theory for Fiduciary Duties, reaffirms that only Managers, not Employees or Shareholders, have Fiduciary Duty to “manager-managed” LLC

Illinois First District Rejects Veil Piercing Theory for Fiduciary Duties, reaffirms that only Managers, not Employees or Shareholders, have Fiduciary Duty to “manager-managed” LLC

Document Cited Authorities (3) Cited in Related
Oliver v. Isenberg, 2019 IL App (1st) 181551-U, arose from a lawsuit among members of a once-prosperous entity known as the Combined Group, LLC (“Combined” or “the company”) over the hostile breakup of the company. The circuit court held after a bench trial that Mark Oliver, a shareholder and employee of Combined, had a fiduciary duty to the company as “manager” because he was also an officer and primary shareholder of the company’s managing member, the Combined Holding Group, Inc. (CHG). The appellate court rejected this conclusion: because Oliver himself had never been designated as a manager of Combined, he had no fiduciary duty to it. However, he did have a fiduciary duty to CHG as an officer and shareholder of that closely-held entity.

In 1984, Oliver and three others merged their respective entities and founded CHG, a closely-held corporation that they treated as a partnership. After one later retired, Oliver and two others remained. They were equal shareholders of CHG and all were officers and directors of CHG.

The founders created Combined to act as CHG’s primary business. Combined was a manager-managed LLC that specialized in helping manufacturers place products with retailers for sale to consumers. About 64% of Combined was owned by CHG, and the remaining shares were divided among various junior partners. CHG was Combined’s manager and vested with sole and exclusive authority to manage and control the company’s affairs.

Combined’s operating agreement mandated retirement at the end of the fiscal year in which the founders attained the age of 70. For Oliver, this was December 31, 2012. In anticipation of his retirement, Oliver began making plans in 2011 to transition control over his major accounts to Combined. The transition process caused dissention among the three CHG shareholders. In addition, Oliver uncovered evidence of mismanagement of Combined by the other shareholders, which, along with declining sales, led him to question the viability of the company and its ability to fund his retirement payout. He presented this evidence to two key junior partners in November 2012.

All three left the company on January 1, 2013 and immediately commenced operation of a new entity, Signature Sales and Marketing. By January 19, 2013, all of the accounts belonging to the three had moved to Signature. Unable to reach an amicable agreement regarding the breakup of Combined, the parties filed suit against one another. Among other things, Combined and CHG...

Experience vLex's unparalleled legal AI

Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.

Start a free trial

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex