In re Flit

309 Ga. 440

846 S.E.2d 403

In the MATTER OF Neil Richard FLIT.

S20Y0637

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided: July 15, 2020

William Van Hearnburg, Paula J. Frederick, Jenny K. Mittelman, William Dallas NeSmith, State Bar of Georgia, 104 Marietta Street, NW Suite 100, Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3592, for Appellant.

Warren Raymond Hinds, Warren R. Hinds, P.C., 1303 Macy Drive, Roswell, Georgia 30076, for Appellee.

Herman Maddox Kilgore, Kilgore & Rodriguez LLC, 36 Ayers Avenue, Marietta, Georgia 30060, LaRae Dixon Moore, Page Scrantom Sprouse Tucker & Ford PC, 1111 Bay Avenue 3rd Floor PO Box 1199, Columbus, Georgia 31902-1199, for Other Party.

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the special master, who recommends that the Court accept the petition for voluntary surrender of license filed by Neil Richard Flit (State Bar No. 091307) after the filing of a formal complaint, pursuant to Bar Rule 4-227 (c). In his petition, Flit requested that he be allowed to voluntarily surrender his license for his admitted violations, in two separate matters, of Rule 1.15 (I) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, see Bar Rule 4-102 (d), and the State Bar has requested that Flit's petition be granted. For the reasons that follow, we accept the petition.

In her report and recommendation, the special master found that, with regard to State Disciplinary Board ("SDB") Docket No. 7215, Flit, who has been a member of the Bar since 2007, was retained to represent a client in a personal injury claim. Flit settled the case and deposited the funds in his trust account on or about August 2013. The client died in January 2014, but Flit did not promptly give the administrator of the client's estate an accounting of the settlement proceeds or deliver to the administrator any of the funds the estate was entitled to receive until February 2018. With regard to SDB Docket No. 7231, the special master found that Flit was retained to represent a separate client in a different personal injury claim. Flit settled the case and deposited the funds in his trust account on or about June 2016, but he did not promptly give his client an accounting of the settlement proceeds and did not deliver to his client the funds she was entitled to receive until January 2019. The special master agreed with Flit that his conduct in both cases violated Bar Rule 1.15 (I), the maximum penalty for which is disbarment.

Noting that a surrender of license is tantamount to disbarment, see ...