Sign Up for Vincent AI
In re Interest of T.M.W.
Deborah A. Feagan, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Caroline B. Curley, Philadelphia and Kathleen B. Kim, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Cureley A. Cole, Philadelphia and Lue B. Frierson, Philadelphia, for participating party.
M.A.W. (Mother) appeals from the trial court's orders1 involuntarily terminating her parental rights to her minor daughter, T.M.W. (Child) (born 4/12), and changing the placement goal to adoption. After careful review, we are constrained to vacate.
The City of Philadelphia Department of Human Services (DHS) first became involved with Mother's family in September 2016 when it received a general protective services report concerning deplorable housing conditions and possible medical neglect of Child, who had been diagnosed with Sickle Cell Disease. Mother had taken Child to the emergency room at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), indicated to medical personnel that Child, who was then four-and-a-half years old, handled her own medications for her disease, and also informed hospital employees that the family home was infested with bedbugs.2 Mother reported that the bugs were coming out of her skin and Child's skin. No bedbugs were observed by medical staff on either Mother or Child, raising concerns about Mother's mental health. DHS later met with Mother in her home; they did not observe bedbugs in the residence. Mother, however, insisted that the bugs were attacking her and Child, having entered their bodies through various orifices. Following the home visit, DHS implemented a rapid service response initiative, recommending that Mother use a bedbug eradication treatment for her home. Mother rejected this recommendation, insisting that DHS provide her a more expensive treatment administered by the exterminator of her choosing. When DHS refused, Mother decided to self-exterminate.
On January 30, 2017, Child was adjudicated dependent and committed to DHS's custody. In March 2017, Child was placed with her maternal aunt in kinship care. At the adjudicatory hearing, a social worker from CHOP testified that Mother had taken Child to the hospital seven times for physical examinations, claiming that various cavities of Child's body were infested with bugs. The court was concerned about Mother's mental health due to the fact that no one else involved with Mother's case was able to see the bugs. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court ordered Mother have twice-weekly supervised visits with Child at DHS, and ordered her to undergo a psychological evaluation to assess her "current emotional and behavioral functioning and to make recommendations related to her behavior health treatment needs." Joseph Foote, Ph.D., Psychological Evaluation, 2/10/17. Doctor Foote conducted Mother's psychological evaluation and, as part of his evaluation, Dr. Foote reviewed Child's dependency evaluation, the dependency court's referral and report, the family court docket, and Child's adjudication and disposition. Doctor Foote diagnosed Mother with delusional disorder and recommended Mother undergo individual therapy and a psychiatric evaluation to assess her need for medication.
On March 2, 2017, the Community Umbrella Agency (CUA) developed a single case plan (Plan) for Mother, to include the following: sign consents for her and Child's medical and mental health treatment; comply with CUA case manager; and attend twice-weekly supervised visits at DHS. In May 2017, the Plan was amended to add the following objectives: follow treatment recommendations from Dr. Foote and participate in therapy with a psychiatrist. In April 2017, Mother began weekly psychotherapy sessions with Gardner Jacobs, M.D., a psychiatrist. In a June 2017 report, Dr. Jacobs reconfirmed that Mother presented with delusional disorder; however, the doctor noted that her condition had improved with psychotherapy, recommended that Child be reunified with Mother with supervision , and also recommended that Mother continue with psychotherapy until there is no return of her delusional disorder for at least six months. Gardner Jacobs Report, 6/6/17.
At a July 2017 permanency review hearing, the CUA case manager testified that Mother occasionally behaved inappropriately during visits with Child, speaking negatively about Child's caregiver, her maternal aunt. In October 2017, CUA revised Mother's Plan to include the following objectives: be referred for a parenting capacity evaluation (PCE) and a psychiatric evaluation, and continue psychotherapy with Dr. Jacobs. At a January 24, 2018 review hearing, it was reported that Mother was not engaged in mental health therapy.3 William Russell, Ph.D., prepared a PCE on Mother; Dr. Russell reviewed several materials prior to coming to his medical conclusions. The materials Dr. Russell reviewed included permanency review orders, Dr. Foote's psychological evaluation, CUA's revised Plan, and GPS report narratives. Notably, Dr. Russell did not review either Dr. Jacobs’ treatment records or his expert report to prepare for his evaluation of Mother. As part of his evaluation methodology, Dr. Russell conducted a clinical interview with Mother on January 31, 2018, performed a personality inventory on Mother, and communicated electronically with CUA case manager, Ciera Bradsher. In his April 21, 2018 PCE, Dr. Russell concluded that Mother did not have the capacity to provide safety and permanency to Child due to her untreated mental health issues and made the following recommendations for Mother: (1) actively participate in individual mental health therapy, at least once a week, with a therapist experienced in working with delusional disorder and regular psychiatric services; (2) supervised visitation with Child until Mother demonstrates progress and actively participates in mental health treatment; and (3) if reunification remains a goal, Mother should make herself available for home visits from CUA. William Russell PCE, 4/21/18, at 12.
Ultimately, Dr. Russell found Dr. Foote's initial diagnosis that Mother suffers from delusional disorder "supported based on a review of the records and observations at the time of [his] clinical interview." Id. The PCE also indicated that "[Mother] reported there are no longer bugs present in her home." PCE/Forensic Evaluation, 4/21/18, at 3. But see id. at 11 (). Despite Mother telling Dr. Russell that there were no more bedbugs in her home, in February 2018, Mother's Plan was revised to add adoption as a concurrent permanency goal. At an April 18, 2018 permanency review hearing, the court found that Mother was in full compliance with her Plan.
In August 2018, Mother began weekly psychotherapy sessions with licensed psychologist, Janeith Burton, Ed.D. Doctor Burton testified that at the time of the hearings she was in private practice and consulting at a local elementary school and at a mental health agency in Philadelphia. Doctor Burton also testified that she had been a certified school psychologist for over 30 years, a licensed psychologist for over 20 years, and had worked in various school districts and at various city agencies where she provided services through the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation for Adults and the Disability Bureau. N.T. Permanency/Goal Change Hearing, 1/11/19, at 17. In her first psychological evaluation, Dr. Burton noted that Mother told her a DHS social worker inspected her home for the presence of bugs and presented documentation of an exterminator having inspected her home. However, Mother told Dr. Burton that she self-exterminated because she was not able to afford an outside extermination service, and "her home is now free of any bug issues." Janieth Burton, Ed.D, Psychological Evaluation, 8/28/18, at 2. Although Mother disclosed to Dr. Burton that she had "obsessive concern or possible delusions," Dr. Burton testified that during her evaluation of Mother she did not believe that she "present[ed] with delusional thought" and noted that Mother "reports that she no longer is focused upon th[e] issue [of bug infestation in her home]." Id. at 4. Doctor Burton diagnosed Mother with adjustment disorder. Only one month later, in September 2018, Mother's plan was revised to change the permanency goal to adoption.
In January 2019, the court held a status goal change/termination hearing; at the conclusion of the hearing, CUA caseworker Ciera Bradsher and counsel for DHS indicated that the agency had changed the goal to adoption. See N.T. Permanency Hearing, 1/11/19, at 11, 35. At the January 2019 hearing, Dr. Burton testified that she had been providing Mother therapy on a weekly basis for five months, that Mother had told her Child had been taken from her a year-and-a-half earlier, that CHOP determined Mother was erratic, and that Child was adjudicated dependent due to some confusion about how Mother was medicating Child. Doctor Burton testified that she believed Mother suffered from adjustment disorder, not delusion disorder, and recommended Child be returned to Mother.
On February 6, 2019, DHS filed a petition to involuntarily terminate Mother's parental rights to Child under sections 2511(a)(1), (2), (5), (8), and (b) of the Adoption Act4 and a petition for goal change to adoption. Termination and goal change hearings were held on the petitions on April 8, 2019, June 4, 2019, and July 10, 2019.5 Mother's treating psychiatrist (Dr. Burton), an expert in child adolescent family psychology and parental capacity (Dr. Russell), Child's therapist,...
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialExperience vLex's unparalleled legal AI
Access millions of documents and let Vincent AI power your research, drafting, and document analysis — all in one platform.
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Try vLex and Vincent AI for free
Start a free trialStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting